Considérons l'affaire comme terminée

The best thing about this movie would have to be its title. I find the bluntness of "No, The Case is Happily Resolved" oddly funny, so maybe was expecting something a little zanier than what I got with the actual film. Truth be told, it's pretty serious, and apart from a couple of shot sequences here and there, it really couldn't be called action-packed.

At the end of the day, it does the very Hitchcock "man charged with a crime he didn't do" premise quite well, and I found it to be decently engaging for most of its runtime (few non-Hitchcock films have done it as well as the miniseries "The Night Of," though).

Acting and pacing are both solid, but it's probably the music that ends up doing a surprising amount of the heavy-lifting - the score was really well done.

Very good, obscure and underrated movie with three excellent male leads. Enzo Cerusico was prolific and began as a child actor in the 50s plays the poor guy caught up in this violent murder case, Riccardo Cucciolla plays the villainous professor and was in loads including Bava's Rabid Dogs and Melville's Un Flic. Meanwhile the colourful journalist, not too keen on the police line of investigation, is played by Enrico Maria Salerno, elder brother of the director and had most varied career including playing the Inspector in Bird With Crystal Plumage.

Movie begins with graphic sex killing in a cornfield and the witness becomes the suspect as a very well told tale takes us around the streets of Rome and surrounding countryside as a most believable story unfolds and a working class lad seems likely to take the rap instead of the society man. How very Italian.

An man witnesses a murder. The murderer himself sees him and chases after him, but he manages to shake the assassin off and get home. What ensues is a psychological tug-of-war between the eyewitness and the killer.

Riccardo Cucciolla plays a reputable, yet troubled professor who commits a heinous and wanton murder, killing a young prostitute. Enzo Cerusico is a low level clerk, married with a child, who's not strong-willed enough to inform the police right away about the killing.

He then gets caught in a web of lies... will he be able to get out of it? A curious, experienced journalist, portrayed by Enrico Maria Salerno, chimes in to shed some light.

That's an unsung gem of Italian Seventies. The film is shot in such a way that holds you glued to the screen till the end.

A classic 'italian story', in which an innocent and ignorant worker (witness to a crime) pays in the place of the real guilty, a high society professor. Besides the not so original topic the movie offers good acting performances and depicts perfectly the life of a low-class worker living in the suburbs of an italian city in the mid-70's.

I can see why people may like this film. Basically, it is a very good idea and the acting is perfectly fine. I liked the main guy and all involved. It's just that to me personally, the story moved along so slowly and almost pointlessly at times. I really do like the well made Giallo films and such, and I know this one is more of a somewhat suspenseful police / wrong man story, but if perhaps they had plotted the innocent man's actions a little tighter and gave a little more meaning to the things he does rather than spending about half the time with him just aimlessly running around, I honestly think it would have had more impact. There just wasn't very much 'focus' for the audience here. There didn't seem to be that tension that would hold an audience and keep them in true suspense. I think the story was just too loose and kind of generalized and vague, rather than plotting the story in such a way to have just a little more complexity so as to ratchet up the tension and suspense and really draw people in.

Without giving anything away, I really did like the scene towards the end which was a bit of a surprise. Let's just say that the conversation and explanations added a nice textured layer to the story, and to me was probably the strongest scene. It also gave a new layer of depth to the story which was nice, and gave it a bit more meaning in the way it played out from that point. But overall, I felt that the pace for this kind of clearly Hitchcockian story was WAY too laid back and bland. If they had given more depth and texture to both of the primary characters I think it would have really helped the story a lot. And, just a secondary observation... The soundtrack I thought was pretty lame. It didn't fit the theme of the movie at all. It was this odd, very repetitive song that reminded me more of a romantic couple walking along the beach or downtown, and NOT anything I would associate with a Crime Thriller. I think that if they had given it a really goosed up soundtrack like many films at that time, it really could have added to a more tense, suspenseful mood, instead of this bland, flat song they keep playing over and over. Most odd...

A decent watch, well acted, a good story, but just ultimately not really that terribly engaging as a movie experience. I think based on a strong curve between people who primarily like these kinds of films and people in general, ones who are familiar with this style will probably like it better (although there honestly are much better and more gripping ones out there) But, my thought is that for people in general, they're likely to find it kind of slow. Reviewers have compared this strongly to 'INVESTIGATION OF A CITIZEN ABOVE SUSPICION' which goes a LOT farther to demonstrate corruption and political favouritism by the authorities. But, this one barely touches on those themes at all, despite what some of the reviewers say. I gave it a '6' which I feel is a bit generous, but going by other reviewers here who apparently do like these kinds of films and really liked this one, I tilted my rating a bit more towards those who would likely favour it...