Il y a plus de cent ans, une chaîne d'événements cataclysmiques a plongé la terre dans l'âge des ténèbres, détruisant la majeure partie de la civilisation.Il y a plus de cent ans, une chaîne d'événements cataclysmiques a plongé la terre dans l'âge des ténèbres, détruisant la majeure partie de la civilisation.Il y a plus de cent ans, une chaîne d'événements cataclysmiques a plongé la terre dans l'âge des ténèbres, détruisant la majeure partie de la civilisation.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Gloria Perez
- Dr. Michele Ang
- (as Gloria Mari)
Gregory Fawcett
- Hawks
- (as Greg Fawcett)
William Frederick Knight
- Admiral Hayes
- (as William Knight)
Danny Parker-Lopes
- Bartender
- (as Danny Parker)
Brien DiRito
- Nautilis Lieutenant
- (as Brien Di Rito)
Frank Uzzolino
- New Jersey Hood
- (as Frank Uzzalino)
Avis à la une
While Nautilus may not have had the budget of some of the larger Hollywood projects, they story, action, and acting of the main stars propels this above most attempts at Sci-Fi cinema released. While much of the attention centers around the martial arts prowess of Richard Norton, attention needs to be placed on the actor that portrayed Raoul, the leader of the Eco-terrorism group Equinox. Now known as the host for popular shows such as Shop till you Drop and Outback Jack, Roberto shines in his role here as a man with a mission to save the planet. Showing acerbic wit and physical dexterity, his screen time was a highlight of this film.
Action, Explosions, Intrigue, Time Travel, Martial Arts, what more could a movie buff ask for?
Action, Explosions, Intrigue, Time Travel, Martial Arts, what more could a movie buff ask for?
That other terrible submarine film 30,000 Leagues Under the Sea is even worse than this rubbish, hard to believe but it's true. This one had it all, bad script, acting, casting, special effects, fight scenes and the Admiral looked to be at least ten years past retiral age, was no one younger and more plausible available? Only for lovers of very bad films.
It's awful, difficult to tear your eyes away from.
It's like the zit on the end of the nose of the person you are talking to.
It has redeeming features, hence the 2 stars I gave.
The story line has potential and one or two of the actors make a decent attempt with the dire dialogue.
It's like the zit on the end of the nose of the person you are talking to.
It has redeeming features, hence the 2 stars I gave.
The story line has potential and one or two of the actors make a decent attempt with the dire dialogue.
Being made in 2000 really surprised me actually, because it looks and has the same vibe as a film made in the early 90s, possibly sooner.
It reminded me very much of films that I used to watch with my Granddad from that time period too in terms of plot, the kind of "science" going on, the special effects, everything. Even the same kind of lines, some of them being cheesy. It's decent with how it uses the Sci-fi elements such as time travel, and has some nice touches here and there.
So when I thought it was made sooner than 2000, my rating would have been higher, but with a note it was a product of its time. But I guess since it isn't, it drops a little, but if you know anyone who likes films from that time period. Then it could be an enjoyable watch.
If you are expecting something more modern than what it offers, then you will be a little disappointed.
It reminded me very much of films that I used to watch with my Granddad from that time period too in terms of plot, the kind of "science" going on, the special effects, everything. Even the same kind of lines, some of them being cheesy. It's decent with how it uses the Sci-fi elements such as time travel, and has some nice touches here and there.
So when I thought it was made sooner than 2000, my rating would have been higher, but with a note it was a product of its time. But I guess since it isn't, it drops a little, but if you know anyone who likes films from that time period. Then it could be an enjoyable watch.
If you are expecting something more modern than what it offers, then you will be a little disappointed.
Made for very little money, NAUTILUS is actually a fun science-fiction film combining elements from 20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA, CRACK IN THE WORLD and DIE HARD. On the level of a Roger Corman styled flick, the film has impressive productions values and some very nice miniature work. Richard Norton of the Jackie Chan films is a good, athletic hero and as a middle of the week video rental, this flick delivers the goods in an unpretentious way.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe submarine is a modified fuselage from a F-16 model kit.
- ConnexionsEdited from Time Under Fire (1997)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Nautilus?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 37min(97 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant