[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de parutionsTop 250 des filmsFilms les plus regardésRechercher des films par genreSommet du box-officeHoraires et ticketsActualités du cinémaFilms indiens en vedette
    À la télé et en streamingTop 250 des sériesSéries les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités TV
    Que regarderDernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Nés aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels du secteur
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Repligator

  • 1996
  • Not Rated
  • 1h 26min
NOTE IMDb
3,0/10
531
MA NOTE
Repligator (1996)
Official Trailer
Lire trailer1:09
1 Video
72 photos
ActionComedySci-Fi

Des expériences menées par l'armée sur des appareils de téléportation transforment accidentellement des personnes en alligators.Des expériences menées par l'armée sur des appareils de téléportation transforment accidentellement des personnes en alligators.Des expériences menées par l'armée sur des appareils de téléportation transforment accidentellement des personnes en alligators.

  • Réalisation
    • Bret McCormick
  • Scénario
    • Keith Kjornes
    • T.G. Weems
    • Wynn Winberg
  • Casting principal
    • Gunnar Hansen
    • Keith Kjornes
    • Randy Clower
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    3,0/10
    531
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Bret McCormick
    • Scénario
      • Keith Kjornes
      • T.G. Weems
      • Wynn Winberg
    • Casting principal
      • Gunnar Hansen
      • Keith Kjornes
      • Randy Clower
    • 13avis d'utilisateurs
    • 16avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Vidéos1

    Repligator
    Trailer 1:09
    Repligator

    Photos71

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 67
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux28

    Modifier
    Gunnar Hansen
    Gunnar Hansen
    • Dr. Kildare - Male
    Keith Kjornes
    • Dr. Oliver
    Randy Clower
    Randy Clower
    • Dr. Fields - Male
    TJ Myers
    TJ Myers
    • Dr. Hardy
    Carl Merritt
    • Col. Sanders - Male
    Brinke Stevens
    Brinke Stevens
    • Dr. Goodbody
    Alan York
    • Gen. Mills
    Rocky Patterson
    • Col. Sargeant
    Tyler Mason
    • West - Male
    James Michael Taylor
    • Pvt. Bruno
    Grady Niblo
    • Watson
    T.G. Weems
    • Ripley
    James Bock
    • Pvt. Libo
    • (as James C. Bock)
    Janet Elaine
    • Dr. Kildare - Female
    T. Seret Gomez
    • Col. Sanders - Female
    Karen Alexander
    • Brainwashed Hooker
    Melanie Stewart
    • Mrs. Libo
    Amy Beghtel
    • Buffy
    • Réalisation
      • Bret McCormick
    • Scénario
      • Keith Kjornes
      • T.G. Weems
      • Wynn Winberg
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs13

    3,0531
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    Dethcharm

    "Maybe We'll Get Lucky, And She'll Come Back A Man!"...

    Though it's always nice to see the likes of Gunnar Hansen and Brinke Stevens in movies, this godawfully unfunny sci-fi / sex "comedy" is nowhere near being endurable!

    Granted, the idea of male-to-female-to-reptile transformation is intriguing. Alas, this movie makes it into a misery!

    No, it's not the dollar store "special" effects, robotic "acting", or disastrous attempts at "humor" that make REPLIGATOR so reprehensible. All of these elements, handled correctly, could have resulted in a schlock masterwork.

    Nope, it's the pluck-my-brain-out-with-ice tongs boredom factor that sinks this project! Not even the abundant nudity will keep the viewer's drooping eyelids from slamming shut!

    Back away slowly...
    1A_Roode

    No redeeming qualities. Actually there is one.

    I have challenged my masochistic urge to sit through the worst of moviedom's offerings. What does not kill you makes you stronger, right? Wrong. I'm now convinced it makes you stupider for having gone through it in the first place. I love movies. I love b-movies. I even love bad movies and making my friends sit very uncomfortably through them. But after watching 'Repligator' I've come to the unpleasant conclusion that apparently I don't love myself at all. 'Repligator' is beyond terrible and there is no thesaurus big enough to list the many ways in which 'Repligator' is awful, terrible, bad ...

    Filmed with extreme cheapness (was this project a tax write-off? was it some kind of scam to con government film-funding and other private investors?) and a level of professionalism well-suited to semi-evolved chimpanzees, 'Repligator' fails in every possible category of film. Name one and it fails. The music is distractingly awful and completely out of place. The writing is awful. The acting is beyond cheesy. Or maybe it is just so ... minimalist in its approach that IT DOESN'T EXIST. Direction, editing, camera work, special effects -- nothing works in this film and the whole thing seems like an exercise in how to make stupid people (me for watching) pay for their stupidity (me for watching) with the most pain (me by watching). Even if you're a fan of gratuitous nudity (and there is plenty) it isn't worth it.

    There are no redeeming qualities, save for one: 'Repligator' is clear proof that no matter how low-budget, no matter how bad your film can be, there IS a sucker born every minute. Many of those suckers have money. Find them, milk them for everything you can, and you too can make a movie.
    stevemc

    Good fun

    This film is a great farce, professionally done and worth seeing.
    3virpi32

    One of the movies of all time.

    I mean, look at the cover. You know what you're getting into. It's trash and it's aware of being trash. The acting is horrible, the script is basically non-existent and almost the entire movie was shot in a few days in a dingy studio. But it's still worth watching if you're into really bad movies.

    There's one hilariously out of place establishing shot in the first third of the movie. It's CGI, to be precise: It's mid 90s CGI on a very tight budget. It's utterly mind bending, especially when a pixelated car which consists of at least 20 polygons drives through the shot.

    I almost died laughing watching this scene for the first time, because it feels both alien and stupid. Then the "plot" continues and the rest of the movie alternates between bad dialogue, terrible action sequences and excessive nudity. Just what you'd expect from a movie with a cover like this.

    Still, there's something admirable about this film. I enjoyed it, but also felt violated by the sheer stupidity of this project. I mean, it's about repligators.
    8tugmyrugplz

    Ahead of its time! (ps: nogodnomasters, paul_haakonsen)

    As the title suggests this 1996 movie was very much ahead of its time.

    Look if you're looking for spectacular graphics and beautiful scenery then go watch Oppenheimer. This movie is like a teenage boys fever dream. It's weird, it makes no sense and it has boobs in it.

    I laughed within the first 30 seconds of the film and it wasn't a snort of derision, it was a real laugh. It's obvious to me, but apparently lost on the other reviewers to this film, that the whole thing was made for fun and stupidity.

    It probably cost next to nothing to make and it looks like the actors are having a laugh. So don't be an idiot, don't judge this as if it was high art because it so obviously isn't.

    Lastly this is for all the naysayers out there, cough, nogodnomasters, paul haakenson. Apparently have not seen this hidden gem yet. But one thing I do know, they will "stumble" upon this gem and give their "expert" opinions. Just remember I was here first. I am waiting gents. Until then- I won!

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Embrace of the Vampire
    4,4
    Embrace of the Vampire
    We Are Wolves
    3,4
    We Are Wolves
    Ski School
    4,9
    Ski School
    Joysticks
    4,5
    Joysticks
    Road to Revenge
    4,1
    Road to Revenge
    Special Force
    5,4
    Special Force
    Last Night at Terrace Lanes
    4,4
    Last Night at Terrace Lanes
    Délire à l'université
    3,8
    Délire à l'université
    Malibu Express
    4,8
    Malibu Express
    Maggots
    4,6
    Maggots
    Virtual Encounters
    4,1
    Virtual Encounters
    Sweet Sugar
    5,1
    Sweet Sugar

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Keith Kjornes fractured his right shoulder doing the stunt in his office which made the cut and was the only take.
    • Gaffes
      Private Waring, while playing a substantial part in the film, is not listed in the credits.
    • Citations

      Dr. Goodbody: Any questions?

      Pvt. Libo: Will I get a woodie, sir? Ma'am? Sir.

    • Crédits fous
      This film is a complete work of fiction. There is no government cover up involving the REPLICATOR PROJECT. Really! Any similarity between the characters in this film and real people is, while pathetic, a coincidence.
    • Connexions
      Featured in Screaming in High Heels: The Rise & Fall of the Scream Queen Era (2011)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ15

    • How long is Repligator?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 1 janvier 1996 (Mexique)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Реплигатор
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Irving, Texas, États-Unis
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 26 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Repligator (1996)
    Lacune principale
    What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Repligator (1996)?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Salle de presse
    • Publicité
    • Tâches
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.