692 commentaires
Suffused with a sense of twilight melancholy and pre-millennial nostalgia, John Frankenheimer's end-of-career genre masterwork Ronin is an unapologetic old-fashioned caper playing as the perfect reaction to a formally ubiquitous genre, the Cold War-era espionage Euro-thriller. The film savours a haunting final gasp just prior to being downsized by 21st-century Bourne-driven techno-overload and an onslaught of bloodless PG-13 CGI spectacles. It shows the talent of Frankenheimer that he manages to take what is essentially a rather one-note often contrived story and turn it into something truly special, approaching the material with seriousness, commitment and professionalism. Lean, sleek, spare, almost minimalist; it's like watching the revival of a forgotten art form. The fact that it's done with a minimum of special effects makes it all the more stirring, a tribute to the film's earnestness that we can overlook most of its absurdities and simply revel in its deeds. Elevated by its talent in front and behind the camera, the winning combination of Robert De Niro and Jean Reno imbues the film with a likeable brothers-in-arms chemistry that sees the duo at the peak of their prowess; while Robert Fraisse's photography and Elia Cmiral's score construct a believable and lived-in atmosphere of hyperrealism. Carried by a style that's fast, furious and impeccably paced, at the time of release, Ronin might have seemed like an efficient vehicle, nowadays it's more akin to a classic car, one with exceptional class you won't find in most automobiles today.
- DanTheMan2150AD
- 27 mai 2024
- Permalien
I picked up this DVD in Asda's a few weeks ago and seeing it had Robert De Niro starring convinced me enough to buy it. Then seeing in the credits it starred Jean Reno, Sean Bean and Jonothan Pryce too made me realise I was watching a winner here.
I wasn't wrong either, this film is brilliant. The beginning is slow and tense; dark, clear colours in the picture sets the mood perfectly. From then on most of it is pretty much action.
Five mysterious men of various backgrounds (ex-CIA, KGB etc) meet in Paris, France for a job headed by a Northern Irish woman. The job is to steal a case from a group and return the case to their as yet unknown employers. Just as things seem to run smoothly, one of them is a double-crosser.
Now for some of the best bits, the car chases. These are shot magnificently as Peugeot's, BMW's and Audi's tear through the streets of Paris. These chases are the most thrilling chases I have ever seen. And when you get chases, you get crashes. Think on-coming traffic chases and you might get the picture.
This is a must see film. 8 out of 10.
I wasn't wrong either, this film is brilliant. The beginning is slow and tense; dark, clear colours in the picture sets the mood perfectly. From then on most of it is pretty much action.
Five mysterious men of various backgrounds (ex-CIA, KGB etc) meet in Paris, France for a job headed by a Northern Irish woman. The job is to steal a case from a group and return the case to their as yet unknown employers. Just as things seem to run smoothly, one of them is a double-crosser.
Now for some of the best bits, the car chases. These are shot magnificently as Peugeot's, BMW's and Audi's tear through the streets of Paris. These chases are the most thrilling chases I have ever seen. And when you get chases, you get crashes. Think on-coming traffic chases and you might get the picture.
This is a must see film. 8 out of 10.
- coldwave171
- 22 avr. 2003
- Permalien
A great movie that you can't just watch with one eye. It starts slow, laying a strong foundation, and if it's on TV, it's easy to get lost by not paying attention at the beginning. However, it's an outstanding film, exploring the characters with a huge action movie in the background.
It's visually interesting and doesn't ever let you know the things you think you need to know, but by the end you've forgotten that you wanted to know them in the first place. Robert DeNiro gives a strong performance and doesn't get lost in some of the showiness he can deliver when he's making up for a weaker story, and the supporting cast is full of familiar faces, many of which blend so well into the characters they play that, again, you can become lost in the story (although this time, it a good way).
It's visually interesting and doesn't ever let you know the things you think you need to know, but by the end you've forgotten that you wanted to know them in the first place. Robert DeNiro gives a strong performance and doesn't get lost in some of the showiness he can deliver when he's making up for a weaker story, and the supporting cast is full of familiar faces, many of which blend so well into the characters they play that, again, you can become lost in the story (although this time, it a good way).
- sdlocalhead
- 24 mai 2006
- Permalien
- CuriosityKilledShawn
- 9 févr. 1999
- Permalien
For its genre, Ronin is a good film. I don't think it's quite fair to criticize it for what it is not, such as saying that it's a poor film because there are movies out there with better car chases.
I saw it at the theatre and thought it was OK, saw it on video expecting to be more disappointed, and actually liked it better the second time.
I don't think the plot is as difficult to understand as some might claim. I had no trouble following it. Whether or not it's credible, well, how many action films are? It's credible enough for me to watch it and not say is this ever stupid. That's about all that I look for in an action film, sorry to say.
I actually enjoyed the dialogue for the most part. DeNiro and Reno in particular were solid. The film did begin to fade towards the end, especially once everyone was in the skating arena. I appreciated Frankenheimer showing as much of France as he did. That was a bonus.
So, yes, I could point to a number of flaws in Ronin. But, perhaps because of my low esteem for action films overall, I would say it's a worthwhile watch if you're an action fan, or a DeNiro fan, as I am.
I saw it at the theatre and thought it was OK, saw it on video expecting to be more disappointed, and actually liked it better the second time.
I don't think the plot is as difficult to understand as some might claim. I had no trouble following it. Whether or not it's credible, well, how many action films are? It's credible enough for me to watch it and not say is this ever stupid. That's about all that I look for in an action film, sorry to say.
I actually enjoyed the dialogue for the most part. DeNiro and Reno in particular were solid. The film did begin to fade towards the end, especially once everyone was in the skating arena. I appreciated Frankenheimer showing as much of France as he did. That was a bonus.
So, yes, I could point to a number of flaws in Ronin. But, perhaps because of my low esteem for action films overall, I would say it's a worthwhile watch if you're an action fan, or a DeNiro fan, as I am.
- MrsRainbow
- 20 mars 1999
- Permalien
One of the best action films of the late '90s. A group of mercenaries deals with a job that from the beginning was expected to be difficult. An outstanding cast, with great interpretations by De Niro and Jean Reno. The narrative has the usual plot holes of a spy/conspiracy film, but apart from that, it is a lesson in how to make a good film within the genre, with well-crafted twists and intense and credible dialogues. 'Ronin' continues to have, in my opinion, one of the best car chase scenes ever. If you like the '70s and '80s classics, you will like this one as well.
- MarcoParzivalRocha
- 11 juil. 2020
- Permalien
Every once in a rare while comes an action movie that is also a genuinely good film. This is one of those movies. What makes these uncommon movies what they are is simple: plot. No movie can compromise that and in recent years Hollywood has been doing just that to show off it's million dollar special effects and two cent story lines. This film has both pulse pounding breakneck action scenes and developed and interesting story.
The story starts when mercenaries are hired to retrieve a secret silver briefcase with mysterious contents. The mission goes awry with betrayal and we soon find out that everyone has their own motives and goals with the mysterious silver case.
The cast is good and the direction is smooth and keeps the story flowing and it'll keep you guessing right up to the very end about just exactly what is going on and who everyone is. Then, there are the car chases and they are awesome. Truly awesome and even legendary by now. Just like classics like 'Bullitt' and 'The French Connection' and goofy camp films of the seventies (like the original 'Gone in 60 Seconds') this film uses no hyper-crazy CGI in its action scenes and that proves all for the better since it is an action movie, but it cannot lose all it's credibility for the sake of some cars crashing. A thrill needs to be at least partly believable, otherwise it won't be thrilling. In fact the whole film has a more realistic feel to it with the relentlessness of the action being not over the top, but still enjoyable for fans of the genre. Then there are the characters who much more real as they don't snap wise cracks while shooting bad guys square in the head one handed with a pistol at 30 yards.
All in all, this is a very good entry in the action genre and Hollywood should take note. 8/10
Rated R for violence
The story starts when mercenaries are hired to retrieve a secret silver briefcase with mysterious contents. The mission goes awry with betrayal and we soon find out that everyone has their own motives and goals with the mysterious silver case.
The cast is good and the direction is smooth and keeps the story flowing and it'll keep you guessing right up to the very end about just exactly what is going on and who everyone is. Then, there are the car chases and they are awesome. Truly awesome and even legendary by now. Just like classics like 'Bullitt' and 'The French Connection' and goofy camp films of the seventies (like the original 'Gone in 60 Seconds') this film uses no hyper-crazy CGI in its action scenes and that proves all for the better since it is an action movie, but it cannot lose all it's credibility for the sake of some cars crashing. A thrill needs to be at least partly believable, otherwise it won't be thrilling. In fact the whole film has a more realistic feel to it with the relentlessness of the action being not over the top, but still enjoyable for fans of the genre. Then there are the characters who much more real as they don't snap wise cracks while shooting bad guys square in the head one handed with a pistol at 30 yards.
All in all, this is a very good entry in the action genre and Hollywood should take note. 8/10
Rated R for violence
- BroadswordCallinDannyBoy
- 23 sept. 2005
- Permalien
Now THIS is what I call an action movie. Combine a brilliant cast (Robert De Niro + the underrated Jean Reno, Sean Bean amongst them) with brilliant action scenes - gun fights and car chases are both top notch here; in fact, they're some of the best that have been put on film ever, and stand the rest of time really well (watching in 2022g - with lots of exotic European locals, like Paris and Nice, and a touch of swirling intrigue thrown in for good measure and you have a really great film.
De Niro plays a no-nonsense American mercenary hired by someone shadowy to retrieve a case. He doesn't know much more than that, except the folks currently in control of it are willing to kill to keep it in their possession. Lots of sketchy actors on both sides, including Russians and Irish!
De Niro plays a no-nonsense American mercenary hired by someone shadowy to retrieve a case. He doesn't know much more than that, except the folks currently in control of it are willing to kill to keep it in their possession. Lots of sketchy actors on both sides, including Russians and Irish!
- allmoviesfan
- 5 nov. 2022
- Permalien
This thriller from veteren John Frankenheimer is pure excellence, the script, acting and action are top draw. De Niro and Reno are brilliant in this as of course you would expect from two such excellent actors. The action scenes are pulse pounding and particularly excellent are the car chases, probably the best ever. Not only did the stunt guys risk their lives but the guys shooting the action captured some truly thrilling close up view from the cars as they speed along. The action also carries a certain degree of realism to it, the shootouts are sensible and the car chases and crashes seem very genuine no massive corkscrewing threw the air like most car chases or cars jumping 100 feet in the air like in Gone in 60 seconds, which is all very good but not for this sort of thriller. The pacing of the film was great and there was a constant chilling atmosphere. As I said before Robert De Niro and Jean Reno were exceptional particularly in their scenes together. The support cast are good too with a brief but excellent display from Sean Bean and Natasha Mchelhone and Jonathan Pryce are both good as Irish terrosists with comendable accents. All in all a very god way to spend a few hours.
- supertom-3
- 19 févr. 2002
- Permalien
Ronin is defined as a Japanese Samurai who has lost his master and must search for work as a sword for hire or reduced to banditry. A group of experts are gathered in Paris by Deirdre (Natascha McElhone) who is looking to steal a mysterious suitcase. The group (Robert DeNiro, Jean Reno, Stellan Skarsgård, Sean Bean, Skipp Sudduth) don't know each other and don't trust each other. The plan is very sketchy, and Deirdre won't tell them what's in the suitcase.
Director John Frankenheimer shows that he still has a bit of juice left in him. The best thing about this movie is the class of acting talents he is able to get. Robert DeNiro is superbly brilliant. Jean Reno is absolutely solid, and Sean Bean puts in a nice turn. The objective is almost unimportant. This is about a bunch of great actors playing around with some mysterious characters. Each of whom may turn out to be something less than reliable.
Director John Frankenheimer shows that he still has a bit of juice left in him. The best thing about this movie is the class of acting talents he is able to get. Robert DeNiro is superbly brilliant. Jean Reno is absolutely solid, and Sean Bean puts in a nice turn. The objective is almost unimportant. This is about a bunch of great actors playing around with some mysterious characters. Each of whom may turn out to be something less than reliable.
- SnoopyStyle
- 23 avr. 2014
- Permalien
"Ronin" is one of those rare action films like "The French Connection" and "To Live and Die in L.A." that will keep a viewer watching from beginning to end. The performances in this movie are nothing short of superb and terrific. All of the key characters deserve a lot of credit, ranging from De Niro, Reno, McElhrone, Pryce, Skarsgard, and especially, Michael Lonsdale, who fills in the missing link with such detail and looks like he made the little samurai action figures with extreme care. The best scene of the film isn't the shootouts or car chases, it's the conservation that Sam (De Niro) and Jean-Pierre (Lonsdale) have over the Ronin myth. I'll have to admit that "Ronin" is the first film that I have seen was made by the crafty veteran director John Frankenheimer ("Grand Prix", "The Manchurian Candidate"). If you haven't seen "Ronin", go to a video store and rent the movie now.
- mhasheider
- 29 mars 2000
- Permalien
A pretty decent action outing for Robert De Niro and John Frankenheimer. Good photography of some of the seedier neighborhoods of Paris and other French cities. This film is quintessential De Niro, and he gets all the good lines. There is an interesting revelation at the end, which I will not reveal here. The case everyone is after, is a complete McGuffin, what Hitchcock called that plot device, the thing which everyone wants, and it doesn't really matter exactly what that is. I think that Frankenheimer may have been paying homage to Hitchcock on this, as what is in the case is never revealed. Apparently David Mamet was the script doctor on this film, and it ended up OK. I am of two minds on Mamet, having liked "The Untouchables" a lot, and disliked "Glengarry Glen Ross" and loathed "Oleanna". I also liked Natascha McElhone, who I had never heard of. She is a beautiful and accomplished actress. Some people complained about her brogue. OK, she's not Meryl Streep. But then again, who is? A lot of actors won't even try. I look forward to seeing more of her.
Oh, yeah, and some of the car chases were really, really cool, almost McQueenian.
Oh, yeah, and some of the car chases were really, really cool, almost McQueenian.
Frankenheimer has crafted a meticulously put together film with spectacular French scenery and equally spectacular car chases and crashes through the narrow streets of French villages. However, as seems to be common with many films today, ultimately the film is all splash and no substance. De Niro and his co-stars are hired by unknown people (eventually revealed to be the Irish) to steal a case with unknown contents (weaponry of some sort is assumed) from an unknown group who is trying to sell it to the Russians. Considering that all of this group is supposed to be some kind of superspies, they all are found awfully easily when they are supposed to be in hiding. Double crosses occur which add a wrinkle to the film. But in the end, the revelations that are offered do not seem worth the time the viewer has expended in the theatre. Lots of violence seems to be the major appeal of the film.
- barnabyrudge
- 16 nov. 2005
- Permalien
- Leofwine_draca
- 3 nov. 2016
- Permalien
Ronin is a beautiful looking movie that utilizes its gritty depiction of Paris and Nice to its advantage. Watching this picture 26 years after it originally released, it paints a thoroughly nostalgic and unconventionally idyllic view of France. Laden with big leather jackets and a plethora of iconic European cars from the 90's, it is oozing with atmosphere and easily immerses you into its setting. That is by far this movie's biggest strength, along with its extremely entertaining (albeit sometimes clunky) car chase scenes.
The plot is... less great. It tells a very vague and mostly nonsensical heist story, where a group of international criminals meet up for the first time to do a job together, in a similar vein to Reservoir Dogs. The glaring difference between the two movies is that the person who's in charge of setting up the job in Ronin seems to have very little control over their hired criminals, who easily bully their handler into being given more information and money, as well as them being generally terrible at working in a group!
While the overall premise is little more than flimsy, the moment-to-moment banter between the group is decent, and the action scenes are well executed. The acting is also great in general, despite somewhat poor writing in a couple of scenes. It's a movie carried quite effortlessly by its aesthetics, to a point where you can ignore most of the plot's faults because of how easily you get immersed into the world the movie's created for itself. Ronin drags a bit towards the end, with a third segment that was not as entertaining as the rest of the movie, but it is overall a great, laidback watch.
The plot is... less great. It tells a very vague and mostly nonsensical heist story, where a group of international criminals meet up for the first time to do a job together, in a similar vein to Reservoir Dogs. The glaring difference between the two movies is that the person who's in charge of setting up the job in Ronin seems to have very little control over their hired criminals, who easily bully their handler into being given more information and money, as well as them being generally terrible at working in a group!
While the overall premise is little more than flimsy, the moment-to-moment banter between the group is decent, and the action scenes are well executed. The acting is also great in general, despite somewhat poor writing in a couple of scenes. It's a movie carried quite effortlessly by its aesthetics, to a point where you can ignore most of the plot's faults because of how easily you get immersed into the world the movie's created for itself. Ronin drags a bit towards the end, with a third segment that was not as entertaining as the rest of the movie, but it is overall a great, laidback watch.
- datmotorstormer
- 20 août 2024
- Permalien
This is one of my favourite films, though I have to admit, it is starting to look a bit dated (released 1998). This, however, does not detract from it at all, and the quality still shines through from what is an excellent and oft overlooked movie.
De Niro gives one of his better performances as a 'for hire' go-to guy, Jean Reno also plays well as his French equal, and Sean Bean pops up in what amounts to a cameo piece as an incompetent ex-SAS man for which he really hams it up for the cameras.
What sets this movie apart is the excellent car chase scenes, which really go on and on, and not in a bad way! This is real stunts, real set pieces done to very high quality, keeping the viewer gripped throughout (we have to remember that this is pre-Bourne movies, where the style of action film changed significantly). The cloak and dagger espionage and double crossing harks back to classic thrillers in cinema, and given the fact we never find out what everyone is actually chasing after, it is credit to the story telling and character building that this fact never actually matters in the end.
Twenty five years after release this movie is still a superior espionage/crime thriller with superb action set pieces and a strong cast. A highly recommended watch.
9/10.
De Niro gives one of his better performances as a 'for hire' go-to guy, Jean Reno also plays well as his French equal, and Sean Bean pops up in what amounts to a cameo piece as an incompetent ex-SAS man for which he really hams it up for the cameras.
What sets this movie apart is the excellent car chase scenes, which really go on and on, and not in a bad way! This is real stunts, real set pieces done to very high quality, keeping the viewer gripped throughout (we have to remember that this is pre-Bourne movies, where the style of action film changed significantly). The cloak and dagger espionage and double crossing harks back to classic thrillers in cinema, and given the fact we never find out what everyone is actually chasing after, it is credit to the story telling and character building that this fact never actually matters in the end.
Twenty five years after release this movie is still a superior espionage/crime thriller with superb action set pieces and a strong cast. A highly recommended watch.
9/10.
- Movie_Beta
- 22 avr. 2023
- Permalien
- superyellyfish
- 26 juin 2021
- Permalien
- Dean_Jenkins
- 31 janv. 2009
- Permalien
Ronin is a 1998 action thriller film directed by John Frankenheimer that follows a group of mercenaries who are hired to steal a mysterious briefcase.
The film has a great cast, with De Niro, Reno, and Bean all giving excellent performances and bringing a lot of depth and nuance to their characters. The story is also well-crafted, with plenty of twists and turns to keep the audience guessing. However, the film's soundtrack/movie theme is a bit of a letdown.
Overall, Ronin is a classic action thriller that still holds up today (2023). It's a must-see for fans of the genre.
I give Ronin a 7.5 out of 10.
The film has a great cast, with De Niro, Reno, and Bean all giving excellent performances and bringing a lot of depth and nuance to their characters. The story is also well-crafted, with plenty of twists and turns to keep the audience guessing. However, the film's soundtrack/movie theme is a bit of a letdown.
Overall, Ronin is a classic action thriller that still holds up today (2023). It's a must-see for fans of the genre.
I give Ronin a 7.5 out of 10.
- Nazi_Fighter_David
- 22 juin 2007
- Permalien
- Metrocrash
- 9 mai 2005
- Permalien
"Ronin" puts DeNiro at the center as a mercenary who is hired by people unknown to nab a case with contents unknown for reasons unknown. This international intrigue thriller set in France has all the usual Hollywood action excesses (car chases ad nauseam, stunts, pyro, firefights, etc.), and excellent cast, and even a bit of a story which keeps us, the audience, wondering what's in the case, why do they want it, etc. during most of the film. "Ronin" is all business from the get-go and a cut above the average Hollywood formula action flick. Worth a look for those who few who may have missed it.
A group of unemployed military, intelligence and CIA agents from around the globe are employed for a covert operation in Europe. The group must capture a briefcase for Deirde, however a series of double crosses and set-ups leads some members of the group into a dangerous game of betrayal and treachery.
This set itself out as something fantastically different from special FX films, but really this is an addition to the spy thriller genre with the same old hackneyed plot and rough characters. The plot here is quite good for the most part - the best bits being the build-up to getting the case and the chases, however the latter half falls into double-cross mania and loses much of the credibility it had early on. The film also tries to rope the plot into real life events involving the IRA, but this doesn't work and just creates a bit of a mess at the end. However, as I said, before all the baggage starts to weigh the film down this is a very tight little thriller with a simple plot.
The main talking point of the film at the time of release was the car chase scenes. No using any CGI effects, these are very exciting and very well executed throughout the film and, unlike some critics claimed, you don't get bored of them after the first one (there's only 2 or 3). The direction is excellent during these scenes - highlighting the speed, danger and narrowness of the streets, the only criticism would be the camera lingering on several multiple pileups in the wake of the action, these made me feel like I was watching the Blues Brothers or Cannonball Run rather than a thriller.
The characters are good, if a little stereotyped. De Niro and Reno and good together and have a nice chemistry for the most part. McElhone is good as the IRA leader of the group, while of the others Sean Bean and Skarsgård stand out. The worst link in the film is Jonathon Pryce's IRA mastermind - he has one of the worst Northern Ireland accents I've ever heard and his performance is limited by that.
Overall an enjoyable thriller that loses it's way towards the end as it starts to get tangled up in it's own plot.
This set itself out as something fantastically different from special FX films, but really this is an addition to the spy thriller genre with the same old hackneyed plot and rough characters. The plot here is quite good for the most part - the best bits being the build-up to getting the case and the chases, however the latter half falls into double-cross mania and loses much of the credibility it had early on. The film also tries to rope the plot into real life events involving the IRA, but this doesn't work and just creates a bit of a mess at the end. However, as I said, before all the baggage starts to weigh the film down this is a very tight little thriller with a simple plot.
The main talking point of the film at the time of release was the car chase scenes. No using any CGI effects, these are very exciting and very well executed throughout the film and, unlike some critics claimed, you don't get bored of them after the first one (there's only 2 or 3). The direction is excellent during these scenes - highlighting the speed, danger and narrowness of the streets, the only criticism would be the camera lingering on several multiple pileups in the wake of the action, these made me feel like I was watching the Blues Brothers or Cannonball Run rather than a thriller.
The characters are good, if a little stereotyped. De Niro and Reno and good together and have a nice chemistry for the most part. McElhone is good as the IRA leader of the group, while of the others Sean Bean and Skarsgård stand out. The worst link in the film is Jonathon Pryce's IRA mastermind - he has one of the worst Northern Ireland accents I've ever heard and his performance is limited by that.
Overall an enjoyable thriller that loses it's way towards the end as it starts to get tangled up in it's own plot.
- bob the moo
- 3 janv. 2002
- Permalien