Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe action heats up when history's most memorable icons come to life for an amorous meltdown in this interactive "please touch" museum.The action heats up when history's most memorable icons come to life for an amorous meltdown in this interactive "please touch" museum.The action heats up when history's most memorable icons come to life for an amorous meltdown in this interactive "please touch" museum.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Everett Rodd
- Pete
- (as Everett J. Rodd)
Kurt Sinclair
- Melvin Cooley
- (as Kurt Schwoebel)
Tori Sinclair
- Eve
- (as Lisa Sutton)
Laura Palmer
- Juliet
- (as Petra Sexton)
Avis à la une
Ever watch a porno and wonder 'man, if only they had a decent story to go along with it' ?
Well, that about sums it up with this movie. Basically a softcore porno by the guys at Surrender Cinema, it's pretty good.
Mind you, I like to watch tons of sex and nudity like the next guy, but I found myself fast forwarding past some of the long sex scenes because well, there's so many of them. But that give tribute to the fact that I wanted to see the story behind all the sex as well. Pretty good.
Well, that about sums it up with this movie. Basically a softcore porno by the guys at Surrender Cinema, it's pretty good.
Mind you, I like to watch tons of sex and nudity like the next guy, but I found myself fast forwarding past some of the long sex scenes because well, there's so many of them. But that give tribute to the fact that I wanted to see the story behind all the sex as well. Pretty good.
I remember staying up late, very late to watch this.
Oh man, I was so deeply disappointed. The sex scenes are worthless. The plot is even more so. The acting is the pitts. There are some nice bodies, I guess. But come on! First of all, the wax idea? Didn't work very well. The sex scenes are horrible -- they are in incredible slow motion, and it looks as if no excitement comes out of it.
What an incredible waste of film...
Oh man, I was so deeply disappointed. The sex scenes are worthless. The plot is even more so. The acting is the pitts. There are some nice bodies, I guess. But come on! First of all, the wax idea? Didn't work very well. The sex scenes are horrible -- they are in incredible slow motion, and it looks as if no excitement comes out of it.
What an incredible waste of film...
3berw
Well, what an awful music. The Surrender Cinema's guys should choose other composers...
The movie ? Uh... Not very beautiful actresses (except Jacqueline Lovell), an horrible story, an horrible light, soft and not good sex scenes (except, except, except a FOUR LESBIANS SCENE!!! Woah!)
For Lovell's fans only...
The movie ? Uh... Not very beautiful actresses (except Jacqueline Lovell), an horrible story, an horrible light, soft and not good sex scenes (except, except, except a FOUR LESBIANS SCENE!!! Woah!)
For Lovell's fans only...
I've seen most of them and, like other guys, F-Fwd to the sex scenes. I don't drool over them, rather I look for some level of realism in the scenes, the "eloquence of their efforts" or reality of their faking. I'm REALLY bored with the ho-hum 'undress and caress' stuff Shannon Tweed is notorious for - all of her films were meant for insomniacs!
I pessimistically look for anything that says 'fake' (except the silicon of course) such as the way over-used 'girl riding the guy's thigh' scene, both standing upright with him behind her, either of them grinning their super-plastic Ken & Barbie doll look with 'ain't I beautiful?' smiles, yada, yada yada, you get the picture.
Even though most of the scenes in this flick failed my aforementioned checks there was one scene that I had to have worn out rescanning - I'm still convinced the scene where she's laying on her back on a wall was severely cut by the editors just to scathe the MPAA X rating! This scene alone warrants a 'very-watchable' status for this one, and I'm gonna rent it again...
I pessimistically look for anything that says 'fake' (except the silicon of course) such as the way over-used 'girl riding the guy's thigh' scene, both standing upright with him behind her, either of them grinning their super-plastic Ken & Barbie doll look with 'ain't I beautiful?' smiles, yada, yada yada, you get the picture.
Even though most of the scenes in this flick failed my aforementioned checks there was one scene that I had to have worn out rescanning - I'm still convinced the scene where she's laying on her back on a wall was severely cut by the editors just to scathe the MPAA X rating! This scene alone warrants a 'very-watchable' status for this one, and I'm gonna rent it again...
even by the extra-low standards for soft porn, this movie fails to entertain. if you find yourself up late watching skinemax and this comes on, don't hesitate. turn it right away. (especially because there's way too much exposition before you get to the good stuff.)
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMichelle Bauer was up for a role in this, but her new manager Robert Lombard talked her out of it saying it wasn't in her best interest and it conflicted with the scheduling of Colick (1997), a TV mini series she was appearing in. Also, according to Bauer, Lombard just didn't approve of what he called the low quality projects produced by Full Moon.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Full Moon's: Trailer Rama: Flesh for Fantasy (2023)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Exotic House of Wax?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 25 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Spanish language plot outline for The Exotic House of Wax (1997)?
Répondre