[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Elizabeth

  • 1998
  • Tous publics
  • 2h 4min
NOTE IMDb
7,4/10
108 k
MA NOTE
POPULARITÉ
3 395
540
Elizabeth (1998)
Home Video Trailer from USA Films
Lire trailer2:24
3 Videos
99+ photos
Costume DramaDocudramaPeriod DramaBiographyDramaHistory

Les premières années du règne d'Elizabeth I d'Angleterre et sa tâche difficile d'apprendre ce qui est nécessaire pour être un monarque.Les premières années du règne d'Elizabeth I d'Angleterre et sa tâche difficile d'apprendre ce qui est nécessaire pour être un monarque.Les premières années du règne d'Elizabeth I d'Angleterre et sa tâche difficile d'apprendre ce qui est nécessaire pour être un monarque.

  • Réalisation
    • Shekhar Kapur
  • Scénario
    • Michael Hirst
  • Casting principal
    • Cate Blanchett
    • Liz Giles
    • Rod Culbertson
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    7,4/10
    108 k
    MA NOTE
    POPULARITÉ
    3 395
    540
    • Réalisation
      • Shekhar Kapur
    • Scénario
      • Michael Hirst
    • Casting principal
      • Cate Blanchett
      • Liz Giles
      • Rod Culbertson
    • 467avis d'utilisateurs
    • 106avis des critiques
    • 75Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompensé par 1 Oscar
      • 35 victoires et 56 nominations au total

    Vidéos3

    Elizabeth
    Trailer 2:24
    Elizabeth
    Cate Blanchett Almost Played Clarice Starling?
    Clip 3:37
    Cate Blanchett Almost Played Clarice Starling?
    Cate Blanchett Almost Played Clarice Starling?
    Clip 3:37
    Cate Blanchett Almost Played Clarice Starling?

    Photos122

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 116
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux64

    Modifier
    Cate Blanchett
    Cate Blanchett
    • Elizabeth I
    Liz Giles
    • Female Martyr
    Rod Culbertson
    • Master Ridley
    Paul Fox
    Paul Fox
    • Male Martyr
    Terence Rigby
    Terence Rigby
    • Bishop Gardiner
    Christopher Eccleston
    Christopher Eccleston
    • Duke of Norfolk
    Peter Stockbridge
    • Palace Chamberlain
    Amanda Ryan
    Amanda Ryan
    • Lettice Howard
    Kathy Burke
    Kathy Burke
    • Queen Mary Tudor
    Valerie Gale
    • Mary's Dwarf
    George Antoni
    George Antoni
    • King Philip II of Spain
    • (as George Yiasoumi)
    James Frain
    James Frain
    • Alvaro de la Quadra
    Jamie Foreman
    Jamie Foreman
    • Earl of Sussex
    Edward Hardwicke
    Edward Hardwicke
    • Earl of Arundel
    Emily Mortimer
    Emily Mortimer
    • Kat Ashley
    Joseph Fiennes
    Joseph Fiennes
    • Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester
    Kelly Macdonald
    Kelly Macdonald
    • Isabel Knollys
    Wayne Sleep
    • Dance Tutor
    • Réalisation
      • Shekhar Kapur
    • Scénario
      • Michael Hirst
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs467

    7,4108.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    Dan1863Sickles

    A Shallow Masterpiece, Cheap and Cynical

    It's painful to watch this movie, because the overpowering beauty of the locations, the cinematography, and the cast (mainly Cate Blanchett) is used in the service of an almost unbelievably shallow, smug, and cynical reading of English history.

    Other reviewers have already done a superb job of pointing out the factual inaccuracies of the film's portrayal of Elizabeth and her advisors. What I'd like to comment on is the overriding theme. This is not a feminist movie. This is a pseudo-feminist movie. In order to make Elizabeth strong, the men have to be presented as weak, duplicitous, or stupid -- or sometimes all three at once! Cynically, the film makers seem to assume that the only way to make Elizabeth look strong is to surround her with weak, morally repellent men. Or perhaps they think that the mere presence of a strong woman automatically emasculates men.

    In actual fact, of course, the remarkable thing about Elizabeth's reign is that she brought out the best in the men who served her. She was in fact an inspiring figure. None of this comes through in the movie. Weak men fail her, and strong men are simply destroyed by her. Whose fantasy is this, anyway?

    Related to this is the problem of patriotism. Elizabeth's ruthlessness and determination are presented cynically in the film as a matter of strict self-preservation. In actual fact, Elizabeth was beloved by her people precisely because she loved England much more than her own security or safety. Moreover, her ability to take risks and defy France and Spain stemmed from her intuitive knowledge of the strength of the English people. She trusted them, and they trusted her. None of that comes across here. To put it another way, Elizabeth in real life was a master politician who enjoyed interacting with her subjects and was always able to communicate with them. But in this movie there is not one single crowd scene, not one single time when Elizabeth seems interested in, let alone guided by, the hopes and fears of the English common people.

    This movie assumes that to a modern audience, "patriotism" is a dirty word. As a result it entirely misses the point of Elizabeth's life, and fails to understand either her motivations or the underpinnings of her success. Cynicism without insight, spectacle without grandeur, passion without emotion . . . this is the most shallow masterpiece ever made.

    Cate Blanchett deserved better, and so did Elizabeth.
    Drestin Black

    Masterful

    I'm not big on historical dramas, but I saw this because I'm interested in that period. The film is a thing of beauty. The cinematography, lighting, and editing are masterful. The acting is superb: refined, and not overdone as can be the case in these things. Blanchett and Rush are especially good. All in all, a wonderful film.
    9MaxBorg89

    Queen Blanchett

    The Academy Awards ceremony of 1999 angered many people: Shakespeare in Love, albeit a very smart and funny film, robbed the superior Saving Private Ryan of the Best Picture Oscar; Roberto Benigni beat Edward Norton in the Best Actor category (though it was the Italian star's behavior, rather than his performance, that irritated those attending the event); and Gwyneth Paltrow, who wasn't actually bad in Shakespeare, walked away with the Best Actress award, depriving Cate Blanchett of the recognition she should have received for her revelatory work in Elizabeth.

    This film, the first in what the director hopes will be a trilogy (the second installment was released in 2007), covers the early years of Elizabeth I's reign, from her harsh upbringing to the decision to call herself "the Virgin Queen". To describe her situation as tough is an understatement: she was a Protestant monarch in a largely Catholic kingdom, several covert groups wanted her dead and foreign sovereigns kept asking for her hand in marriage, without ever succeeding, for the only man she loved was also the only one she couldn't have.

    Conspiracies and unhappy romances: two unusual ingredients for a period drama. And that is exactly why the film succeeds: in the mind of director Shekhar Kapur, this is not the usual costume film where events are observed with a static eye and what might be perceived by some as excessive slowness (Quentin Tarantino's infamous rant about "Merchant-Ivory sh*t" is aimed at those productions); instead, we get a lively, vibrant piece of work, with the camera sweeping through the gorgeous sets and leering at the exquisite costumes while recounting the grand story. And what a story: the thriller aspect aims to please viewers who find the genre a bit lacking in the tension department, whereas the Queen's doomed love affair with Joseph Fiennes' Earl of Leicester (a plot element to which the BBC miniseries from 2005, starring Helen Mirren and Jeremy Irons, is a sort of sequel) is the polar opposite of the sanitized, passionless romantic tales that tend to feature in other period films.

    Good-looking technique and strong storytelling would, however, be useless if the title role wasn't played by an equally great actress, and Pakur found the perfect Elizabeth in Blanchett: an odd choice she may have seemed (she was a complete unknown in Hollywood prior to being cast in this movie), but the performance she delivers is nothing short of astonishing. Doubtful, determined, passionate, naive, heartbroken, firm and charismatic - she is quite simply the best on-screen incarnation of Elizabeth in the long history of biopics. The supporting cast (Fiennes, Geoffrey Rush, Christopher Eccleston, Richard Attenborough) is also excellent, as expected from British and Australian thespians, but it is Blanchett who dominates the entire picture. Shame the Academy didn't take notice.
    9lulia

    Who can tell for sure how it really was?

    I just watched Elizabeth, for the second time and once again I was ...what would be the word...moved? Not in the teary-eyed sense, but in a way that makes you want to read more about Elizabeth I.

    However, I have read other comments and two things occurred to me. First, that many people (brilliant scholars or erudite people whom I respect) pretend that "it did not look that way" or " it did not happen that way", such and such. Who are you to tell? History is not an exact science, it is a HUMAN way to try and keep in touch with the events that shaped the world we live in. Being interested in history and costume history myself, nothing STRIKE me as BLATANTLY anachronistic. I think that Mr. Kapur primarily wanted to illustrate Elizabeth's rise to power, not her entire reign, which would take several films. His film is an account of an episode of English history, not a chronic on life in Tudor England, hence the lack of filth and lice, as someone mentioned... The second element is a more personal one, that in fact came to my mind while watching the film: how could Cate Blanchett lose the Oscar to Gwyneth Paltrow, of all people?! Her performance in Shakespeare in Love was charming, no less but no more. I think that trying to catch the conscience of a queen, to make an illustrious historic figure come to life is far more difficult than playing William Shakespeare's (fictitious) love interest.

    It was my humble opinion, and I wanted to share it with other IMDB users.
    PivoGirl

    What Tamed Passion!

    In a year overwhelmed with reminiscent films, Elizabeth rises above the rest to become one of few stunning manifestations of the Hollywood Renaissance. Certainly acknowledged by the Oscars garnering 7 nominations, Shekhar Kapur's intimate portrait of a young Elizabeth further expands the modern view on a distant monarch, whose maturing reign as well as taming nature continued to dazzle the 20th century viewers.

    Presented here by a superb cast led by Golden-Globe winner Cate Blanchett, early Elizabethean era turmoil and upheaval are captured brilliantly. The lush set itself is a feast for the eye as the audience is drawn to follow a passionate young Elizabeth's path. Against the dark setting of medieval stone castles, a blooming Golden Age approaches as England expands to take control in a world of great unrest after Catholic Queen Mary's death. Her Protestant half-sister, Elizabeth daughter of Anne Bolyne is placed on a throne of a kingdom torn between religion. Cate Blanchett does a fabulous job capturing the details of a frustrated young woman waking to the merciless reality of queenhood--surrounded by enemies such as Norfolk (Christopher Eccleston). Constantly by her side is her reverent adviser Sir William Cecil (Richard Attenborough) who advises Elizabeth to marry for convenience choosing from a "pool" of ready political candidates--while Elizabeth herself is long set on her lover from the past Sir Robert Dudley (a charming Joseph Fiennes). Yet just as England learns to wake up from the medieval dream, Elizabeth learns the bitterness of betrayal as she looks to Sir Francis Walsingham (Jeffrey Rush)'s counsel.

    Focusing on Elizabeth's subtle changes of phase from fire to ice at a distant in the midst of a grander panorama beautifully shot, the audience gradually distinguishes her footsteps from the shedding of innocence to a tough ruler that dares to strike first against her enemies, to ultimately become the Virgin Queen to reign above all men.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Elizabeth - L'âge d'or
    6,8
    Elizabeth - L'âge d'or
    Shakespeare in Love
    7,1
    Shakespeare in Love
    Deux Sœurs pour un roi
    6,7
    Deux Sœurs pour un roi
    Victoria : Les Jeunes Années d'une reine
    7,2
    Victoria : Les Jeunes Années d'une reine
    Les Tudors
    8,1
    Les Tudors
    The Duchess
    6,9
    The Duchess
    Marie Antoinette
    6,5
    Marie Antoinette
    Marie Stuart, Reine d'Écosse
    6,3
    Marie Stuart, Reine d'Écosse
    Elizabeth I
    7,9
    Elizabeth I
    The White Queen
    7,7
    The White Queen
    Raison et sentiments
    7,7
    Raison et sentiments
    Anna Karenine
    6,6
    Anna Karenine

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      1998 was the only year that two performers were nominated for Academy Awards for playing the same character in two different films: Judi Dench was nominated (and won) for Best Actress in a Supporting Role for playing Queen Elizabeth I in Shakespeare in Love (1998), and Cate Blanchett was nominated for Best Actress for portraying Elizabeth I in this film. Joseph Fiennes and Geoffrey Rush appeared in both films as well.
    • Gaffes
      Robert Dudley recites Sir Philip Sidney's sonnet "My true love hath my heart" to Elizabeth in a boat. This sonnet was not written until at least 1580, about 20 years after the time the movie is set, and wasn't published until 1593.
    • Citations

      [last lines]

      Elizabeth: Observe, Lord Burghley, I am married. To England.

    • Connexions
      Edited into Elizabeth - L'âge d'or (2007)
    • Bandes originales
      Te Deum
      Composed by Thomas Tallis

      Performed by St. John's College Choir, Cambridge

      Conducted by George Guest

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ20

    • How long is Elizabeth?Alimenté par Alexa
    • How accurate is this movie to the actual history?

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 11 novembre 1998 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Royaume-Uni
      • États-Unis
    • Langues
      • Anglais
      • Français
      • Turc
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Elizabeth, la Reina Virgen
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Bamburgh Castle, Bamburgh, Northumberland, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni
    • Sociétés de production
      • Polygram Filmed Entertainment
      • Working Title Films
      • Channel Four Films
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 30 000 000 $US (estimé)
    • Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 30 082 699 $US
    • Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 275 131 $US
      • 8 nov. 1998
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 82 150 642 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      2 heures 4 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • DTS
      • Dolby Digital
      • SDDS
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Elizabeth (1998)
    Lacune principale
    What is the Hindi language plot outline for Elizabeth (1998)?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.