La plupart des passagers d'un avion disparaissent, et les autres font atterrir l'avion dans un aéroport mystérieusement désertique.La plupart des passagers d'un avion disparaissent, et les autres font atterrir l'avion dans un aéroport mystérieusement désertique.La plupart des passagers d'un avion disparaissent, et les autres font atterrir l'avion dans un aéroport mystérieusement désertique.
- Nommé pour 1 Primetime Emmy
- 3 nominations au total
Avis à la une
To be perfectly honest I did not see this as a scare film. It was not remotely frightening to me, but that did not prove to be a negative part to it. The story is brilliantly told, and the sfx weren't that bad. It was clearly an unreal format of effects, but this added to the unique structure.
Overall I enjoyed the Langoliers, a story of mystery and adventure crammed with plot twists.
Langoliers" when I saw that it would be on USA the next two
nights. So I said to myself, "Self...why don't you watch it and see
how it compares?" As an adaptation, this movie is just about as faithful as you can
get. Some minor changes were made for time (for example, an
entire character was dropped from the plane...he didn't do much or
contribute ANYTHING to the plot, he just slept the whole time), but
all in all, it was pretty much like an abridged audiobook with visual
images. Virtually nothing was changed in the transfer from page
to screen. As a result, the weaknesses in the movie mostly stem from
weaknesses in the book. I really like Stephen King's style, though
I haven't read very much by him. The most interesting thing about
the story is the horror of the unknown, and each character's
different reactions to it...hysteria, anger, disbelief, etc. My problem
with the story (and the movie as well) is that the Langoliers are a
bit of a letdown. Visually, they looked like computer-generated
images, not like real monsters. But even in the story, their
presence seems unnecessary. The most frightening parts of the
story are when the passengers of Flight 29 have no clue what's
going on. Wouldn't the Langoliers have been more interesting if
we never saw them, but knew they were there...i.e., seeing the
disappearance of the world, hearing the sound of the Langoliers,
but never seeing them...possibly a brief glimpse as the plane
takes off or as one of the characters gets eaten. Acting wise, the movie was a mixed bag. Some people really got
into their roles. I though Bronson Pinchot was great as Craig
Toomey, and I also think he's pretty underrated as an actor since
he was Balki in Perfect Strangers. Other people, I thought were a
little flat. I've never been too fond of David Morse (the pilot), and as
much as I like Dean Stockwell (Al from Quantum Leap, whoo-hoo),
he didn't seem to fit the role of the mystery writer Bob Jenkins. The special effects were pretty miserable. It all looked like pretty
low-tech computer effects - the plane, the Langoliers, the time rip.
Not too impressive. But hey - TV movie, what do you expect? Overall, this is an excellent adaptation of a pretty good story. Some
changes should have been made in the transfer, but that's my
opinion.
For a basic plot summary (no spoilers), a small group of airplane passengers wake up and find the rest of the plane deserted. As they struggle to land the plane and figure out what is going on, they discover that the answer is beyond anything that has ever been seen or experienced before.
First off, it would take a great sight more than a bit of 90s cheesy-ness to detract from King's wonderful tale. This is a wide-ranging story (from drama to sci-fi to characters to fantasy) that has something for everyone. Most of King's writing shines through in this adaptation.
The acting, however, is what really drives this three-hour film. Great actors such as Patricia Wettig, Dean Stockwell, David Morse, Mark Lindsay Chapman, and Bronson Pinochet (among others) all provide new wrinkles to the overall storyline by portraying such a diverse cast. Is the acting over-the-top? You bet. But due to the diversity of the characters and their development, the craziness actually didn't bother me all that much. Perhaps this is because I "knew what was coming" having already read the story, though.
Overall, having prior knowledge of the story, I enjoyed this take on "The Langoliers". While I would still recommend King's written work to get the full extent of the tale, this one will suffice for those who won't pick up a book.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn the novella, there is no wind, not even a light breeze when they are in Bangor. Since this was virtually impossible to execute for the movie they simply created dialogue to explain that even with a wind down here the clouds are not moving.
- GaffesWhen approaching LAX, Laurel notes that everything looks the same and there's no one there. Except there are cars driving around.
- Citations
[Engle informs the remaining passengers that they are diverting to Bangor]
Craig Toomy: I have an important meeting in Boston at nine O'clock! And I forbid you... From flying to some whistle-stop Maine airport! DO YOU HEAR ME?
Laurel Stevenson: Can you please quiet down? You're scaring the little girl.
Craig Toomy: Scaring the little girl? SCARING THE LITTLE GIRL? LADY! We've been diverted to some tin... pot airport in the middle of nowhere! And I have more important things to think about than scaring a little girl!
- ConnexionsEdited into The Timekeepers of Eternity (2021)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Langoliers
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 3h(180 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.33 : 1