NOTE IMDb
4,6/10
565
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA Roman Catholic priest is sent out to investigate two alleged virgin births. One is about to give birth to the Christ, the other to the Antichrist. The race is on to determine which one is ... Tout lireA Roman Catholic priest is sent out to investigate two alleged virgin births. One is about to give birth to the Christ, the other to the Antichrist. The race is on to determine which one is which, with the fate of the world at stake.A Roman Catholic priest is sent out to investigate two alleged virgin births. One is about to give birth to the Christ, the other to the Antichrist. The race is on to determine which one is which, with the fate of the world at stake.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Tony Denison
- Father O'Carroll
- (as Anthony John Denison)
Josh Lucas
- John L. Jordan III
- (as Joshua Lucas)
Patrick Michael Ryan
- Michael's Gang
- (as Patrick Ryan)
Avis à la une
This movie was pretty bad and took alot of effort to sit through. It's based on the book Virgin by James Patterson but only very loosely (the book is much better). As i understand it, this was originally a made for cable (USA network) movie..which explains alot. Not only was the plot pretty ridiculous, but i..being Catholic..found many of the scenes offensive. The premise sounds great (sort of a combination of Rosemary's Baby and The Omen) but the acting and the story were laughable. The only reason i sat through until the end was because i had read the book and wanted to see how far the movie deviated from the book. It deviated alot...and not in a good way.
Actually, the movie is neither horror nor Sci-Fi. With a very strong Christian religious theme, this movie delivers minimal content and no suspense. Second-tier actors do half-decent jobs of reading their boring roles. The only good performance is by Sydney Penny who plays a role of a mother of ... I won't spoil the movie, it's either Christ or Anti-Christ. Avoid watching this movie unless you a Christian religious fanatic obsessed with apocalypse.
Being a non-Christian, I had to force myself to watch this movie just because I wanted to write this review. It's a pity that Sci-Fi channel had to air this movie at the peak evening time.
Being a non-Christian, I had to force myself to watch this movie just because I wanted to write this review. It's a pity that Sci-Fi channel had to air this movie at the peak evening time.
I guess if you are into the sci-fi and horror stuff it might be interesting. The acting was okay but not great. The two pregnant girls are supposed to be fifteen but are played by obviously older actresses who turned out to be twenty and twenty-one at the time. The plot is okay, but the story does jump around a bit, leaving one guessing whether you're in Boston or Pennsylvania. The priest seems to use warp speed between the two. The catholic church is portrayed as having a secretive sect for investigating events which only happen to those of that faith. What if the two girls had been protestant? Would the catholics of cared? Therefore some what contrived. Who knows, some day the catholic church might even learn what the Bible teaches. If you miss this one, don't feel you've lost anything.
Two women get pregent at the same time. Problem is both of them are virgins. One will give birth to the child of God. The other one will give birth to the child of Satan. A made for TV movie that is exactly like every other TV movie. It's dull, bland and of course features a familiar face or two in the cast. It isn't really all that bad, but it isn't much of anything either. Pity.
Rated PG-13; Violence.
Rated PG-13; Violence.
CHILD OF DARKNESS, CHILD OF LIGHT has an intriguing title but turns out to be a completely pointless TV movie that readily copies the likes of THE OMEN alongside ROSEMARY'S BABY. The storyline sees a priest investigating a prophecy which tells of two births: one child will be good, one evil, and he has to figure out which is which.
The movie plays out low-key for the most part, at least until the very silly ending, and this makes it a real bore to sit through. The problem with religious-themed films is that the characters are often boring and that's the case with the protagonists here. It says something that TV veteran Sela Ward (THE STEPFATHER) ends up playing the most interesting person in it, and that's hardly saying much.
There is the potential for interest here and there, with allusions to Biblical plagues and the like, but sadly these are kept off-screen for the most part in favour of the dullish detective story. Perhaps better actors would have improved this, but I doubt it; some nice location shots are all you're going to find here. Otherwise, it's completely underwhelming.
The movie plays out low-key for the most part, at least until the very silly ending, and this makes it a real bore to sit through. The problem with religious-themed films is that the characters are often boring and that's the case with the protagonists here. It says something that TV veteran Sela Ward (THE STEPFATHER) ends up playing the most interesting person in it, and that's hardly saying much.
There is the potential for interest here and there, with allusions to Biblical plagues and the like, but sadly these are kept off-screen for the most part in favour of the dullish detective story. Perhaps better actors would have improved this, but I doubt it; some nice location shots are all you're going to find here. Otherwise, it's completely underwhelming.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe novel "Virgin" (1980) by James Patterson, which was the basis for this 1991 made for cable TV film, was later rewritten, republished and re-titled "Cradle and All" (2000) and then still later slightly rewritten and republished again in 2016 under the same title as the second version for Patterson's teen book imprint "Jimmy Patterson".
- GaffesAt one point in the film, Dr. Phinney claims to have thoroughly examined Margaret Gallager's vaginal tissue and that he has found it "totally undisturbed", from which he also claims that she has "never even masturbated". There is no medical test or examination that can give this result, so if he has done all of this, all that he has done is both carried out an invalid medical test and, essentially, sexually assaulted her. And we're supposed to trust this man?
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 25 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant