Avis des utilisateurs

I first saw A.P.E.X. a long, long while back, I couldn't have been more than about 10 years old at the time and my understanding of it was negligible. All I really remembered was cool robots and a complicated story involving time travel and a plague, which was about enough to convince me to give it a second shot when it appeared on TV, since the passage of years has given early 90's straight to video science fiction of this sort a curious fascination for me that actually outstrips the excitement that they originally induced. Remarkably A.P.E.X. actually repaid my interest, its certainly no classic but as far as its genre goes it certainly ain't too bad. The key is the plot, the film deals in a pretty interesting science fiction concept with a neat emotional hook for its main character. Basically, a mishap involving an exploratory time travelling robot results in our hero landing in a parallel reality that has branched off from his own, confronting him with his greatest fear, that of losing his beloved wife. The film tries to deal with post apocalyptic themes, parallel worlds and the consequences of paradoxes upon the time line, and though it can't quite keep itself together its imaginative and intriguing stuff. The plot actually holds up better than a number of reviews here would suggest, although there are one or two notable holes and clear contrivances. Despite problems the ambition is laudable, it's just a shame that the same ambition didn't carry over to the action, which mostly consists of repetitious shoots outs with robots. The pyrotechnics budget was clearly decent so there are plenty of explosions, plus the robots are pretty cool, shining golden creates with ridge plated armour and both shoulder and hand cannons. But the action gets dull pretty quickly and neither the robots nor humans have realistic or interesting tactics. Acting turns do a better than expected job of sustaining interest, though nobody is much more than merely "there" certain of the cast do convey a certain sympathy and interest. Richard Keats for example as the hero, he can't put across much reaction to the situation but is likable enough, Lisa Anne Russell has a sullen attractiveness, Marcus Aurelius appropriately grating as the token a-hole character, it's all fair enough for this level of film. Some of the writing works, some doesn't and while I appreciated that the film wasn't bogged down with techno-babble it could have done with a bit more explanation. The direction from Philip J. Roth (who turned out to be a low budget sci fi regular and also wrote the film) is occasionally stylish in its use of lighting, with green, red and dark moments put to good effect, he has a fair handling on atmosphere but I wish he had put more flair into the action. Altogether I thought this was a fair enough film. Only likely to appeal to sci fi buffs and they'll probably have a field day tearing it apart, but I had a reasonable enough time. 5/10 from me then.

Time travel usually goes wrong. I think all machines designed for that purpose are legally required to have something like that written on a sticker on it. Someone certainly should have told the people of 2072. They decided to mess around with it to... "check out time". With their Advanced Prototype EXploration units(yeah, that *is* a pretty dumb abbreviation), they... well, do so. Apparently. And one of the trips have Nicholas Sinclair going back, because, uhm, something didn't go as planned(...who'da thunk?). He's recently been having nightmares about his wife disappearing by way of a cheap editing trick. This gives him a nasty case of Must Narrate Everything, in spite of the fact that, with two exceptions, what he says, *we already know*. Anyway, he ends up in an alternate time-line where the robots(and yes, there is a nice amount of sequences of humans fighting them in this... and the suits aren't bad, nor is the weaponry on them, with rockets and machineguns) they would send back(to combat the virus that going back in time would create... and they've been programmed to destroy all biological life, I guess... that was good thinking guys, honestly... how could *anyone* think that would backfire?), as these have been constantly been sent back(... automatically? And they keep being made... by who or what?) for 100 years(...wait, we've survived a century of this war?). Don't worry, the people there have figured out how to smash those metal mf-ers into... oh, wait... plus, he meets up with Duke Nukem. Perhaps you've already realized that this script wasn't authored by someone holding a Ph.d. It's pretty straightforward, and the paradoxes don't hold up to scrutiny. Yes, the AI's aim sucks when it needs to. No, the characters are stereotypical. Yes, the lead being in love with this "universe's" version of his spouse(who resembles her by appearance *only*) means he's really superficial. However, if you watched The Terminator and spent the whole time wishing the entire thing was set in the future... well, this is a fix for you. This is 96 minutes sans credits, and most of it is in a post apocalyptic, dystopian future with plenty of explosions, shooting and... well, attempts at tension. The acting is decent. There is lot of bloody violence and disturbing content and a sex scene(not graphic) in this. I recommend this to those that just want to unwind with something like this. 5/10

This is billed as a time travel paradox movie - it's really a poorly thought out cardboard shoot-em up. It's full of inconsistencies and even the supposed paradox is flimsy at best.

Berserk robo fans might [at 2am on a stormy night] see something in it but science/sci-fi it ain't.

STAR RATING:*****Unmissable****Very Good***Okay**You Could Go Out For A Meal Instead*Avoid At All Costs

In the year 2073,Nicholas Sinclair (Richard Keats) is a scientist working at a time travelling research facility.He has a wife,the beautiful Natasha (Lisa Ann Russell) and works under the command of Dr Elgin (David Jean Thomas).One day,they send a probe 100 years in to the past and completely change the course of history.While attempting to sort out the peoblem,Sinclair finds himself convulted to a present where he finds himself a member of an elite squadron of soldiers,including pent-up muscle man Shepherd (Mitchell Cox),volatile macho man Taylor (Marcus Aurelis) and reserved background man Rasheed (Adam Lawson),not to mention Natasha,who in the present he could remember was his sweet,humble wife but who here is a 'hardened combat soldier',battling an army of robots who can't shoot straight.Sinclair must survive in this hostile environment long enough to find a way back to the present he remembers and stop the accident from ever happening.

The plot is as blatant a rip off of T2 as you could hope to find without the producers being sued for copyright theft,right down to the grey robots causing lots of death and destruction.Said robots are actually really cool,though rather clunky in both their appearance and movement,cruelly exposing the production values of a film that must have had a pretty high budget for a film of it's made-for-video magnitude.

They're not the only problems the film must contend with,however.It must also reckon with a dodgy,confused storyline that never seems to move from one sequence to the next with much in the way of coherence and one or two characters who are just that little bit too contrived in the mould in which they were sculpted to be taken that seriously.There is,however,some good,involving acting on display,not to mention some enjoyable action and one inventive sequence involving a music CD being inserted in to one of the robots when it really shouldn't.You didn't get a scene like that in T2,did you?

Speaking of which,both films are enjoyable enough on their own seperate levels.It's just,I dunno.T2 is Alton Towers,this is the mop fair.Y' know what I'm sayin'?***

Wow! Hold the phone! This is one BAD movie! I bought it for £2.99 in the b-movie section, I suppose you can't ask for much, but this takes the cake!

A.P.E.X stars a load of useless actors who I've never heard of before. The evil robots which get sent back in time look like something out of the Power Rangers! Also, the robots I.Q is very low, they stand there in the line of fire getting shot to pieces and don't even attempt to eliminate the enemy! Plus they have really, really bad aim!

The group of marines who are sent to kill these evil robots are useless and don't look like professional soldiers at all. They simply stand there in the middle of the carnage which is riddled with evil robots and have a conversation! Oh yeah, and there's one really annoying soldier who has a very serious attitude problem.

If your a really big die hard sci-fi action movie fan then you may, like this movie, otherwise forget it!

3/10

APEX is one in a long line of horrible Sci-Fi films made during the 1990's, by people attempting to take advantage of special effects technology, with little or no movie to go along with them. They appear daily on the Sci-Fi channel, which is a complete waste of time itself, with the exception of Mystery Science Theatre 3000.

Don't waste your time.

There is little or no story to this movie. Some people end up on a planet (why, exactly, I forget) and they spend the rest of film blowing up one robot after another. For an equivalent experience, dress up a couple friends in SWAT uniforms and videotape them shooting beer cans for 2 hours. Make sure one of the friends is female, and have a dull, pointless, and totally unsexy love scene at some point.

The obligatory horrible dialogue is omnipresent, and would make Mark Hammill retch. And it's not so bad that it's funny, it's just nauseatingly bad.

Why the Sci-Fi channel insists on showing this garbage repeatedly escapes me. They seem to prefer showing tripe to good Science Fiction films, or even silly camp films like Godzilla. It's probably why my cable company doesn't carry them anymore.

APEX is a complete waste of space. Let it collect dust on the shelf at your local rental store until they get tired of looking at it and pitch it in the bargain bin for $2.99. Buy it and record record hockey games or something over it.

A soldier is sent back to the past and after apprehending a robot, finds out that he has changed his present day and a virus has been spread which has started a war against humans and robots. You know the drill. Phillip J. Roth's tiresome effort is very frustrating because of how it refuses to take advantage of its intriguing ideas. The future is turned into a wasteland and the film is a long fight sequence with boring opponents for our soldier hero to fight, there is also a love angle but unlike say The Terminator, it just slows the movie down and adds nothing of depth. The problem is that the hero spends too much time in his future wasteland rather than going back to change what went wrong, making this into a standard action flick. The movie does have impressive production values, some of the action sequences are well staged and the movie is directed well but for me I missed the science fiction and was disappointed. Roth fared much better with 1998's Total Reality which played on the time paradoxes.

* * out of 4-(Fair)

I saw this movie a long time ago, so I don't remember much of it. I remember some silly looking robots with large CDs popping out their abdominal area and killing people. And I remember it being very boring. I got tired of it before it even developed a plot. I don't remember though, if there was any. It was a movie that couldn't stand fro itself, but shamelessly copied ideas from famous movies.

No reason to see this one. Nada. 3/10

I flopped down on the sofa to watch something at the end of a long week looking after my kids. I was exhausted. I wanted to switch my brain off for a bit and just stare into middle distance. Anything would have done. I was in that sort of place where I could have happily watched shopping channels (well nearly). I grabbed the the movie on top of the pile by the VCR and shoved it in. Unfortunately it was APEX...

I have been reading and watching crappy SF for 35 or so years now and I have read and seen many Time Paradox stories; none of them comes close to being as ill though out, ill written, and downright incoherent as this pile of drek. Even with the central character's voice-overs trying to slap patches over the gaps in the narrative it still makes no sense whatsoever.

What makes this movie a SLIGHT (very slight) cut above the rest is the arty pretentiousness that creeps out from time to time from behind the endless explosions, especially in the camera work. There is a curious use of colour in some shots where the whole set is lit in pure red, or green, or cyan with lots of deep shadows. It looks very peculiar. Almost like black and white film that has been tinted in the lab. Having said that, it's still a bad bad bad bad bad bad movie (I'm tempted to see how many time IMDb will allow me to type the word BAD before they bounce this review).

A Stinker - but not, unfortunately one of those, so bad it's funny movies. It's a bad in a "Who do I have to screw to get OFF this movie?" sort of way.

In the year 2072, a top secret, military-funded experiment dedicated to exploring time sends an APEX (Advanced Prototype Explorer) robot 100 years back in time. Technician Nicholas Sinclair is accidentally thrown back in time after the robot self-destructs. When he returns to the future, he finds himself in a timeline alien to him where mankind is fighting an army of APEX robot soldiers as well as a killer virus caused by time travel.

At first glance, this direct-to-video clone of The Terminator is clearly a B-grade low budget effort, as evidenced by cheap special effects (although the robots are very convincing). However, the film has something which sets it apart from the rest of the killer robot films around – a dose of imagination. The time-travel plot is very well conducted & plausible, although there is a plot hole – where are the robots coming from? With this in mind, the story is well written. The acting is extremely effective, with the actors giving a fair go as far as performances are concerned. Director Roth, known for his slick B-grade action films, conducts the film with a flair for realistic action scenarios.

Grade: B

Review by M. K. Geist.

An interesting premise, where scientists send time-traveling robots to do research with the caveat that they must not leave any traces of their presence in the past, including witnesses. An accident involving the elimination of said witnesses causes a paradox where one of the scientists in charge of the time-travel experiment finds himself in a parallel post-apocalyptic world where soldiers constantly battle a seemingly never-ending supply of time-traveling robots. The low budget shows and the tactics employed to eliminate the robots (gunfire at close quarters for the most part) seem silly, but the movie's an entertaining weekend time-filler.

In opposite to my usual reviews, I won't spend too much time on this one... 'cause, whoever you are(age, sex, etc.) it sucks. Period.

BUT - it doesn't mean that we can't enjoy some of its elements!

I accidentally fell on used VHS versions of this movie a few times. The cover wasn't subtle, you knew it was B-grade from the very beginning, so it never reached my very heart... Then, one day, I bought a small lot of used VHS movies at 1$CND each, and I included this one: I was curious, that's all.

Now that you know how I came to know this piece of poo, here's my opinion: The story is more obvious on the back of the VHS box, than in the movie. But once you get it, it leaves you cold and indifferent. Some Terminator influences can't hide behind this medium-budget production: Metallic humanoids robots with red eye who start to hunt down humans in a post-apocalyptic future, preceded and succeeded by time travels, sick and poor humans living underground, etc.

Add a love story to that, a perfect collection of stereotyped characters, a good "made in USA" feeling, fantastic CGI special effects right out of the 90's, armors made from roller-blade protectors, LOTS of identical explosions (which are clearly exploding behind of before the target), a very pathetic, inconsequently and problematic use of "the butterfly effect" theory, all of this obviously taking place in the same repetitive vicinities and played by average actors. You get the idea? Great.

As I said earlier, it is not original. But I'm pretty sure that if you take the same budget and the same idea, and give it to any b-grade producer, you couldn't really do better.

Finally, if, as I did, you don't take it seriously, you may get entertained a little bit by it's very cliché sequences, but it won't change the fact that this movie still sucks.

I really like the premise of the film; time travel; time continuum violation; a scientist trapped in a violent world. His wife in his own world, is now,in his new world, a tough soldier, stricken with a fatal virus; and she doesn't even like him. He is trying desperately to repair the damage to time, and return the world from that of a violent war zone, beset by robots trying to exterminate all human life, to his own advanced and sophisticated culture. The idea, and the low budget presentation, are intriguing.

I do not believe that every science fiction film can or will have a huge budget and expensive special effects. I enjoyed the actors, the acting and the adventure. I was able to immerse myself in the characters and flow right through the film with them. A.P.E.X has a strong plot, excellent continuity, good science, adventure, suspense and lots of excitement. The director did an excellent job of creating a world on the verge of extinction, hanging onto its humanity by slender threads.

The only elements I did not care for at all, were the extremely foul language that pervaded the entire film; and the degrading stereotyping of the black soldier. He was a good actor, and had a lot more to offer than that of a modern day ghetto brute. His character could have been rough and crude without being completely obscene. All they had to do was leave out all the bad language. The actor did a fine job with his role anyway. I enjoyed his rendition of his character.

I often think that some day, in a more enlightened cultural time frame, we are going to be completely ashamed of the foul language that currently pervades and debases even our finest films. There will possibly be an effort to clean up the old films, and a debate will rage as to whether this is akin to colorization, and destroys the artistic intent of the films. Let us hope.

At any rate, A.P.E.X. is an enjoyable science fiction experience, even with the obscenities intact. I recommend it for mature science fiction fans.

Can't believe this one is from 1994, it's far worse than any SciFi movie from even 70's ... and I mean, not just the so called "special effects" that look like some amateur has played with few explosives, but the "acting" couldn't be more artificial than this and the story, wait, what story?

Avoid at all cost, I made a mistake of actually trying to watch it against all warnings from other IMDB users :(

With apologies to all concerned this has to be the absolute worst film OF ALL TIME! I mean,ask yourself,have you ever seen a film so bad that you were prompted to go online asap to review it? A more complete waste of time & resources you'll be hard pressed to find

Judge for yourself if you can a) suspend disbelief long enough and b)can follow a storyline so absurd and convoluted IT CONFUSES ITSELF!

This confusing sci-fi entry is a mixture of clever ideas (the main character turns out to be the key to the spreading of a deadly virus) and logic loopholes (when the hero finds himself in the "alternate future", the other characters seem to have known him for years; so where is the other version of himself - the soldier - that apparently has been living there all this time? How can two labs communicate when one of them isn't supposed to exist?), but the production looks as slick as the budget will allow, and there are plenty of explosions for those who like them. (**)

Heavily influenced by The Terminator, APEX features time-travel, heavy weaponry and battle robots. The APEX units are rather strangely behaved and incredibly inaccurate with their weapons (although to its credit, the movie does claim that the firefights are occurring at distances of several hundred meters - if only the camera work backed that assertion up...) Still, it's good dumb fun.

Got this as a present about a month ago (don't ask!!) and watched it Christmas Day in work whilst on-call. I must say I never thought I would watch this film as I no longer have a VHS machine and the box didn't exactly inspire me but since there is a TV with built in Video in work I thought it would pass the time. It certainly did. I reckon the acting was good and the story believable (I know this sounds ridiculous)You could tell they didn't have much of a budget but made the most of it. They certainly didn't like showing the robots being blown up as they probably cost a few bob to construct them. All in all a damn good 2 hours not wasted.

I Bought APEX for three Reasons 1)It was Sci fi 2)It was Cheap 3)My friend Recommened it to me

And for £4 english quid ($6 american dollars ) i was not disapointed i liked the voice over it gave a good touch and i liked the story ,the marines wasnt much of marines though (mixture of aliens and The Terminator 1 flash back scenes) the costume was ok but the plastic looking rocket launcher thing was dodgy , and i wont mention the extraordinary square stomachs when they get shot . The robots were really dodgy they looked camp and stiff and laughable but they do the job because when you see them all togrther at the end (predator 2)you think damn ! i wouldnt want to be in the marines boots (well i would) i guess it would be better if it was not set in the desert as much instead in a crumbled city at night where its raining ! well done though to Phillip J Roth both he and Albert Pyun are making a lot of films im liking.

I can't believe the bad reviews I'm reading about this film. I rented this movie from the 'B' section of the video shop when I was a child. I always had a fascination for sci fi movies and low budget productions because I consider them to be the 'grassroots' of the film and entertainment industry. I was highly entertained by this movie and enjoyed the story and the characters. Time travel, robots, paradox worlds, with a love story at its center. You can't ask for more.

I spent years looking for a copy of the film after I saw it, for me it was that good. Of all the 'B' grade movies I've seen, this is one of the best. The cast was unknown but did a really good job.

I've since found this movie on YouTube and watch it at least once a year. Low budget productions shouldn't be compared to multi million dollar films that has many advantages.

I watched this film again today after remembering enjoying it as a kid. I wanted to find out if it really was a good sci-fi B Movie actioner...or if I was just younger and more stupid back then.

I also convinced the other half to watch it with me as she enjoys similar films.

This film then proceeded to divide the house. My missus insists I must have been much stupider all those years ago; but I stand by my original assessment. It's pretty good actually.

There are no big stars, the writing isnt great, some of the effects are ropey and the plot is incomprehensible at times; with holes so big you could fit a starship through them.

...But there is grace in its failings.

It still makes for enjoyable viewing, its strong on action scenes and the robots actually look sharp. Some of the characters are quite likeable too.

You're not going to see oscar bait here. But if you enjoy low budget B Movie action, park your brain in neutral and coast through the film...you'll probabaly like it.