[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter

  • 1992
  • R
  • 1h 44min
NOTE IMDb
5,1/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter (1992)
Horreur

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA creature of demonic nature, too hideous to have a name, once again terrorizes the college kids that summoned it.A creature of demonic nature, too hideous to have a name, once again terrorizes the college kids that summoned it.A creature of demonic nature, too hideous to have a name, once again terrorizes the college kids that summoned it.

  • Réalisation
    • Jean-Paul Ouellette
  • Scénario
    • H.P. Lovecraft
    • Jean-Paul Ouellette
  • Casting principal
    • Mark Kinsey Stephenson
    • Charles Klausmeyer
    • Maria Ford
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    5,1/10
    1,3 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Jean-Paul Ouellette
    • Scénario
      • H.P. Lovecraft
      • Jean-Paul Ouellette
    • Casting principal
      • Mark Kinsey Stephenson
      • Charles Klausmeyer
      • Maria Ford
    • 25avis d'utilisateurs
    • 20avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos37

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 30
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux24

    Modifier
    Mark Kinsey Stephenson
    • Randolph Carter
    Charles Klausmeyer
    • Eliot Damon Howard
    Maria Ford
    Maria Ford
    • Alyda Winthrop
    John Rhys-Davies
    John Rhys-Davies
    • Professor Warren
    Julie Strain
    Julie Strain
    • Creature
    Peter Breck
    Peter Breck
    • Sheriff Hatch
    David Warner
    David Warner
    • Chancellor Thayer
    Shawn T. Lim
    • Robert Barger
    Siobhan McCafferty
    • Off. Debbie Lesh
    Richard Domeier
    Richard Domeier
    • Off. Malcolm Bainbridge
    Brad Blaisdell
    Brad Blaisdell
    • Off. Ben Lesh
    Kevin Alber
    • Jack Herman
    August James
    • Mary Wilkinson
    • (as August West)
    Kit Fredericks
    • The Unnamable
    Bryan Clark
    • Prof. Thurber
    Mike Gordon
    • Joshua Winthrop
    • (as Captain Mike Gordon)
    Chuck Butto
    • Off. Joe Choate
    Harper Roisman
    • Doc Evans
    • Réalisation
      • Jean-Paul Ouellette
    • Scénario
      • H.P. Lovecraft
      • Jean-Paul Ouellette
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs25

    5,11.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    pradaguy762001

    Not a bad sequel just a error on one part

    OK i remember watching this movie when i saw this on video back when i was like 17 and i thought it was a good movie and they tried to take off where the last film ends but the only thing that they messed up on was that they said the creature was born from Joshua Winthrop daughter but that is false he was born from Joshua Winthrop wife in the first film, that really was the only error i found in the movie. The movie was a good overall sequel, i wish they could of had a little more blood and guts, let you know what happened to Tanya from the first film. She was just seen driving off in the police car and was really not mention again. Otherwise not a bad movie
    5Vomitron_G

    Slightly more ambitious follow-up by the same team who brought us the original

    This sequel to "The Unnamable" (1988) is actually a bit more interesting, as it's much more a mixture of things than the original was (it combines two Lovecraft stories this time, 'The Unnamable' & 'The Statement of Randolph Carter'). It flirts with quantum physics and other silly theories, even adding some comedic scenes to the events (which oddly enough do work). John Rhys-Davies is amusing as always, but lasts only half the movie. The always reliable David Warner has a cameo. Being a creature feature, the creature design (worn by actress Julie Strain) lives up to the expectations. The story picks up right after the events of the first film and meanders in slightly different directions this time. Just like the first film, which was much more a slasher-orientated effort, this sequel's hardly a masterpiece. But it's got some spirited moments, a handful of nasty kills and it remains a fun, entertaining watch nonetheless. The beautiful Maria Ford steals most of the show here, as she's walking around completely nude during half of the movie's running time. Furthermore, "The Unnamable II" stays true to the spirit of Lovecraft with a lot of amusing inside references to his works. So fans should be pleased, since a lot worse Lovecraft adaptations have been made throughout the years.
    8mlevans

    A pretty solid sequel

    I accidentally rented Unnamable II tonight, thinking I was renting the original for the first time in a few years. (The original was one of my favorite Gothic horror films.) I was disappointed that I had grabbed the wrong movie, but still enjoyed seeing this one.

    With the possible exception of The Godfather II, sequels never match the originals & this one is no exception. Still, Oulette does a good job in leading us through this dash through campus, with the hideous she-demon behind us. The idea of the split demon-normal girl is intriguing and the lovely Maria Ford is convincing as the 300-year-old coed. Mark Kinsey Stephenson is again solid as the scholarly and fearless Randolph Carter. (Doesn't every college English Department have a senior bookworm like this?)

    My only complaint-and this is one I might not have even thought of before returning to grad school-is that the professors are all Scooby Dooish `all-knowing' doctors. Professor Warren (John Rhys-Davies) apparently is an oral folklore specialist within the English Department…unless he is possibly in sociology or some similar field. For him to have a passing knowledge of quantum physics is not unthinkable. For him to look at a mutilated body and tell claw marks from incisor marks is stretching it considerably. For a literature professor to be running around with a portable microbiology lab in his little black pouch, though, and setting up a microscope, etc., in a dank, dark cave and making glib pronouncements about the blood, however, is akin to no one suspecting `Old Hank' or whoever as being the Scooby Doo villain. Folks, as one who is around professors every day (and who hopes to BE a college history professor in a couple of years,) I can attest that the average English or history professor barely understands how to connect to the Internet or operate PowerPoint, let alone set up a mini-science lab in a dark cave in five minutes!

    This one is okay, but I need to see the original again. Part of the reason I wanted to see the original tonight was so I COULD do an updated review. But that will come. People aren't exactly standing in line to do these two movies. Still, this one is definitely worth watching. Give it a chance!
    7lost-in-limbo

    This is how legends are started

    The competently low-budget sequel (which was made 5 years after the original) sees the story continue where the first film finished off, and director Jean-Paul Ouellette delivers a far better effort on this Lovecraft outing than on the previous one. However while being rather expansive, slicker and better paced, it was kind of laid-back on the violence (which the first film wasn't afraid to bare) and jolting thrills (which aren't as imposing). Some things happen off-screen, but there a few twisted and ravaging acts caught. The slick tone seemed to be aiming for pulpy fun in a fast-moving chase format than the simmering atmospheric jolts in a confined setting, and for most part it works.

    Returning characters Randolph Carter (exaggeratedly acted by Mark Kinsey Stephenson) and Eliot Damon Howard (a solid Charles Klausmeyer) make for a fruitful chemistry, as they must do battle again with the demon with no name. Along for the ride is John Rhys-Davies and Maria Ford who spends plenty of screen time in the nude under her flowing long hair is very convincing in her part. Julie Strain is the lucky one who gets suited up in the creatively effective make-up FX of the titular demon and David Warner also gets in the act, but with very little in the way to do.

    This time around the story (with a consistently witty script) holds a little more substance and character to its framework (where modern science and ancient folklore come to terms) and explores the possibilities, than reverting to a simple stalk n' slash exercise. After the leaving the tunnels under the Winthrop house, this time the action mainly occurs in the illustrative backdrop of the University grounds. The openness of it didn't do much in the favor of holding suspense, but the atmosphere is glum and its straight-laced quirkiness lends well.
    brandonsites1981

    * * out of 4.

    This sequel picks up directly where part one left off and finds the two main characters from the original film seperating the human half from the demon half of part one's monster. They flee with the human half, but the demon eventually escapes from her prison and seeks out the human part to her and killing anyone in her way. Sometimes exciting, sometime scary, slightly better then part one, but bland.

    Rated R; Violence, Brief Nudity, and Profanity.

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Shot in five weeks.
    • Connexions
      Featured in Joe Bob's Drive-In Theater: Fit to Kill & The Unnamable II (1994)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ

    • How long is The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter?
      Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 21 octobre 1992 (Royaume-Uni)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Créature des ténèbres
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Santa Clarita Studios - 25135 Anza Drive, Santa Clarita, Californie, États-Unis
    • Sociétés de production
      • The Unnamable Productions Co.
      • Yankee Classic Pictures
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 1 000 000 $US (estimé)
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 44 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Ultra Stereo
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter (1992)
    Lacune principale
    By what name was The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter (1992) officially released in India in English?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.