NOTE IMDb
5,5/10
4,8 k
MA NOTE
Égaré par ses parents à la naissance, Tommy Patel a été élevé depuis par une famille pakistanaise. Alors qu'il se rend au château de son patron, il découvre sa véritable identité: Duc de Bou... Tout lireÉgaré par ses parents à la naissance, Tommy Patel a été élevé depuis par une famille pakistanaise. Alors qu'il se rend au château de son patron, il découvre sa véritable identité: Duc de Bournemouth.Égaré par ses parents à la naissance, Tommy Patel a été élevé depuis par une famille pakistanaise. Alors qu'il se rend au château de son patron, il découvre sa véritable identité: Duc de Bournemouth.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Catherine Zeta-Jones
- Kitty
- (as Catherine Zeta Jones)
Charu Bala Chokshi
- Mrs. Patel
- (as Charubala Chokshi)
Avis à la une
I'm probably in the minority here... but I always preferred Eric Idle of the members of the Monty Python gang. The more talented writer, both in sketch material and song lyrics(to any other Python fan who appreciates those; Yes, Idle wrote and performed the main theme), the better facial expressions and acting. Naturally, when I found out that he had written and starred in a film of his own(though John Cleese does also have a role), I had to watch it. I don't believe I ever did get to watch this more than a few times, some years back, and then I didn't really go back to it until today. As much as I like Idle, I have to admit that this isn't up to the standards of most of the Pythons' movies or Flying Circus episodes. The basic idea is fun enough; I won't reveal it here, though, since it is an important plot point(and I urge anyone reading this to not read any of the cast credits on the main page... and if you've already done so, try your best to forget what you read). The plot certainly isn't brilliant, but it's quite funny, and makes for some highly comical situations. The pacing is actually fairly solid. I can't think of any point in the film where I was genuinely bored... in spite of knowing everything that would happen. The acting is all very good. The characters are quite well-written, though I guess few of them are particularly likable. The humor is quite black, and some will definitely be offended. I'm not fond of admitting it, but Cleese actually has some of the funniest moments of the entire film. He's not very prominently featured, but he is hilarious when he is on-screen. Moranis is about as tolerable as usual... I don't feel much neither for nor against him, but if you don't care for him, you won't like him in this, either. Idle gets to both under- and overplay, and his presence was definitely the selling point of the movie for me. All in all, some very funny moments, but only just enough to make it worth watching. I recommend it to huge fans of the Monty Python crew, in particular those fond of Idle and Cleese. 6/10
I had never heard of this film, but saw it on offer and snapped it up because of the cast - 2 Pythons and Catherine Zeta Jones!
Moreover, Barbara Hershey attacks her role with relish, Sadie Frost shines in a love-hate relationship with Idle and Rick Moranis manages not to be irritating, and there are cameos from some classic TV stars: Stratford Johns (Z-Cars and Inspector Barlow), Eric Sykes (Carry-On and his own comedy show) and Brenda Bruce (theatrical works). And yet, somehow, it doesn't quite come together to provide the level of entertainment I expected.
Nevertheless, it is worth a watch on a rainy afternoon when one is in the mood for silliness.
Eric Idle does his typical zany stuff as an heir to a castle trying to unseat a loopy American (Rick Moranis), who has taken the position. Some of the scenes in the movie really make you think "JESUS H. Christ!!!!!! I'M REALLY WATCHING THIS!!!!!!!" Probably the aspect that catches peoples' eyes the most nowadays is the presence of a very young Catherine Zeta-Jones; when we first saw the movie, we didn't know who she was. But whether or not that's the aspect of "Splitting Heirs" that most catches your eyes shouldn't be the point. The point is that it's a really funny movie. Whether it's Rick Moranis on the roller skates, Eric Idle getting caught with more than his pants down, or something else, you won't find this movie boring. Also starring Barbara Hershey and John Cleese.
Gosh, I seem to be one of the few people who enjoyed this movie. It certainly wasn't up to the standards of Eric Idle's and John Cleese's other movies, but it still far surpassed many other comedies available (IMHO anyways).
Some parts of this movie had me in stitches. John Cleese right at the end standing on the car for instance.
I'd say this movie isn't the best in the world, but It's still good. 7 out of 10.
Some parts of this movie had me in stitches. John Cleese right at the end standing on the car for instance.
I'd say this movie isn't the best in the world, but It's still good. 7 out of 10.
Well, this movie wasn't the worst I've ever seen...but it was far from the best. It was mildly amusing at times, and although the talent they collected for this film was great, the writing fell flat. Keep an eye out for some great Python-esque jokes, and Barbara Hershey is surprisingly convincing as a sex-crazed duchess, but the one real thing to keep an eye out for is the Hindu Dream Sequence. If you've ever seen the old Indian (Bollywood) version of the Mahabharata, be prepared to laugh your head off. The depiction brought back everything I thought as a kid when I first saw that movie. There were a few other jokes in there that only the British or South Asians would get, but if you're not in either of those categories (or not sufficiently familiar with either) these jokes will be lost on you. Rent this only if you're an insomniac or a die-hard fan of cheesy humour.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesEric Idle is five years older than Barbara Hershey, who plays his alleged mother--and 10 years older than Rick Moranis although their characters are implied to be about the same age.
- GaffesDuring the Hindu dream sequence, the appliance that holds/guides the arrow in Henry Bullock's ear is visible--and it has no arrowhead on it as it "enters" the ear.
- Crédits fousand *introducing* John Cleese
- Bandes originalesI Put a Spell on You
Written by Screamin' Jay Hawkins
Published by EMI United Partnership Limited
Performed by Nina Simone
Recording Courtesy of Phonogram Limited
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Splitting Heirs?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 3 246 063 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 1 738 315 $US
- 2 mai 1993
- Montant brut mondial
- 3 246 063 $US
- Durée
- 1h 27min(87 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant