[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
Retour
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
John Travolta, Kirstie Alley, David Gallagher, and Tabitha Lupien in Allô maman, c'est Noël (1993)

Avis des utilisateurs

Allô maman, c'est Noël

48 commentaires
3/10

Tired and predictable

Look Who's Talking Now is not absolutely unwatchable and certainly not the worst movie ever made, but for me it is weakest of the series. I really enjoyed the first, and while watchable the second was a disappointment. Look Who's Talking Now has its good points, such as the soundtrack and the two dogs voiced wonderfully by Danny DeVito and Diane Keaton. Plus it is not too bad visually.

However, the concept has been done to death but the story feels very tired this time around, and to further disadvantage there are one too many thin and predictable gags and weak lines in the script. Other than DeVito and Keaton the other acting wasn't so impressive, this time John Travolta and Kirstie Alley seem to be phoning in their performances as the bickering couple. And the ending was far too sentimental for my liking.

Overall, perhaps worth the look but it is disappointing for me anyway. 3/10 Bethany Cox
  • TheLittleSongbird
  • 1 août 2010
  • Permalien
3/10

The series hits rock bottom, but hey, it wasn't that far a drop

Well, at least this was the last they made(*no*, Hollywood, that was *not* a dare). In that they had run out of different genders of children to give celebrity voices to, they turned to the pets. This time, they give the family two dogs, one of each gender, give them each a voice and lets the kids rest their inner voices. Why is it that infants, right from the womb(which we, again, see, because there apparently can not be an entry in this franchise without that), have the voice of people who are about middle-aged, give or take a handful of years or so? Apparently, even dogs. Oh well, at least these two actors, DeVito and Keaton, aren't too bad(not that I had a problem with Willis, at least as an actor), and the former's voice fits rather well for a canine. Take that any way you want. At least Roseanne is gone... but they make efforts to make Julie as annoying without her, having her tell knock-knock jokes so lame that even the parents would ask her to stop... she also apparently fantasizes about beating Charles Barkley, who must have liked the part, as he did the same thing again three years later, in Space Jam. Dukakis shows up again, in what can only be loyalty(in a film with dogs as main characters, how fitting). Heckerling neither wrote nor directed this... when the very *creator* of a franchise steps down, you ought to know there's something wrong. There is no trace left of any charm the series ever had(which was all found in the first). I would say that the franchise by this point just has overstayed its welcome, but it could be argued that it achieved that before the end credits of the original film. More nightmare sequences, this time being ridiculous(a first for the series; usually, they were just misplaced and more unsettling than anything a young child should watch). The main conflict is essentially rehashed from the first two, only dumbed down. Lysette Anthony shows up, her acting performance being at the same level that it was in Trilogy of Terror II(that would be poor). This film will insult the intelligence of anyone beyond the age of seven, but some of the humor remains above what they will(or should) understand, or ought to watch. The very ending was almost too much. I recommend this to people who like dogs, and men attracted to Lysette. 3/10
  • TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews
  • 28 oct. 2007
  • Permalien
5/10

good movie for family

good family movie to watch on a Sunday evening full of goodness with talking dogs and this time the kids can talk for them selves also the wife is very paranoid about her husband so it ends up like bit of fights in her dreams Gangtok dogs bogs photogenic none flapping Sedgwick fisticuff this movie is great superb amazing fantastic outstanding dog fun for many people i would recommend this movie for a family of 3 or more so you can sit on your couch while the fire is on to enjoying a good comedy plus the mum(British term) and dad are the same actors so there cannot be any confusions an if any parents think this is bad for there child's life about finding out that Santa is a fake it shows you at the end that there is a Santa clause
  • nicommoreno
  • 13 oct. 2006
  • Permalien
2/10

Well, there are puppies... adorable puppies... gotta love puppies... you know I had to try

  • Smells_Like_Cheese
  • 9 févr. 2004
  • Permalien

John Travolta and Kirstie Alley are great.

John Travolta, Kirstie Alley, and Lysette Anthony are wonderful in this funny, funny film. James and Mollie Ubriacco (John Travolta and Kirstie Alley) now have 2 more bundles of joy...dogs! Danny DeVito lends his talent as the voice of Rocks, a street dog who now belongs to Mikey. Diane Keaton is the voice of Daphne, a poodle that's dropped off by James's boss, Samantha (Lysette Anthony) who's got her sights on stealing James from Mollie. This is a great movie that is really enjoyable for everyone in the family.
  • buppy
  • 7 nov. 1998
  • Permalien
2/10

A Night in the Doghouse

Decided to watch "Look Who's Talking Now" as the podcast "How Did This Get Made" is planning to (rightly) eviscerate it in the near future.

In this second sequel to the inexplicably popular "Look Who's Talking" Mikey and Julie have reached the age where they can actually speak, so the hearing thoughts conceit is pushed onto two dogs that come to live with the family. James (John Travolta) and Mollie's (Kirstie Alley) marriage is being put to the test by the long hours James is taking in his new job as a private pilot, flying around his new boss played by Lysette Anthony. Into their lives come two dogs, Rocks (voiced (badly) by Danny Devito) and Daphne (voiced by Diane Keaton). Eventually the film get bored and crowbars these two plots together before giving up and prolapsing into one of the worst music videos your ever likely to see.

What's striking about "Look Who's Talking Now" upon watching it is the disinterest the people involved it making it seemed to have. I'll save Kirstie Alley and John Travolta from too much criticism here, they are doing their best with what was given to them and both have proven themselves capable in other roles. But that's about the only plus point. Logic is sacrificed pretty early on. Rocks ages from a puppy to fully grown dog during the opening scenes, although there's no other indication that any time has passed, the kids are the same age, and their home situation is the same. The daughter Julie (Tabitha Lupien) is enigmatically obsessed with Charles Barkley, in a way that never pans out to be relevant to the plot (almost as if they convinced Barkley to do a cameo and then had to find a way to get it into the plot somehow). The family are struggling financially, in that kinda of 90's Hollywood struggling where they have a massive apartment in New York, a car and the world is so full of qualified pilots that one would struggle to find work. Everything that happens to, and with, the dogs, who the film was supposed to be about, is completely pointless until the end and they both get a "Lassie" moment to help the film find some sort of conclusion.

And then there's the music video. The version I saw was with Jordy's "It's Christmas, C'est Noel". Merde'. The nadir of badly shot, badly conceived, mess.
  • southdavid
  • 20 nov. 2018
  • Permalien
1/10

Look Who's Sucked!

Ok.. John Travolta needed some money to buy a plane so my guess is that's why he starred in this poorly written/idea of crap. Instead of throwing this one to the dogs, they should have given these two old tykes another sibling to make their lives hell.. but of course someone just said hey, why don't we try animals.. and again these people failed... The original and it's copies should be on the 100 most lamest movies ever made and be burned! Enough Said.
  • mandabeatle
  • 10 févr. 2003
  • Permalien
2/10

Well it was better than two.

This movie is part of one of the worst set of trilogies ever made where all the movies somehow made it to the theater. This one is quite bad, but at least it isn't part two so no Roseanne doing the voice. Here we have Danny DeVito and Diane Keaton doing dogs voices. Not really worth watching and there are probably lots of dog movies that are better. This one has the family being hateful to each other again. Let's face it Travolta and Alley have to be the worst screen couple ever, they always have problems. All in all not worth watching, but at least it is more tolerable than part two, but I say skip the entire set movies as none of them are good.
  • Aaron1375
  • 5 mai 2003
  • Permalien
5/10

Mostly fun, some odd scenes...

For the most part this is a pretty fun movie and a good follow up in the "look who's talking" series. However, it needed to take another pass through the editing department. The family scenes are really well done and come across well, the plot itself is well developed, and the acting comparable. However, most of the early dog talking scenes and the dream sequences could have gone and not been missed.
  • Calicodreamin
  • 8 janv. 2020
  • Permalien
6/10

Not brilliant but still an underrated movie.A nice family film.

  • lesleyharris30
  • 3 janv. 2012
  • Permalien
4/10

A guilty pleasure

While this is a bad film and the low point of Travolta's career he would bounce back a year later with Pulp Fiction.I watched this film as a kid and is a guilty pleasure.
  • leejjones-92486
  • 12 mars 2020
  • Permalien
8/10

This movie is underrated.

  • cblountt
  • 11 déc. 2011
  • Permalien
7/10

Well, *I* liked it. May contain some spoilers.

  • cruztacean
  • 16 avr. 2006
  • Permalien
2/10

Tripe.

What can be said? In an attempt to milk the "celebrity voices something that doesn't have it's own speaking voice" schtick, the Look Who's Talking series wanders from babies (which they did twice) to dogs. I half-expected them to continue the series after this outing by focusing on the talking tapeworms in Kirstie Alley's stomach or some similar thing.

Sure, it's cute and has its moments, but ultimately this movie's a big fluffy nothing with Danny DeVito doing some of the worst voice work of his career, and Diane Keaton doing the worst acting of her entire life, voice or not.

How many "awwww" moments does it take to get to the sappy center of a "Look Who's Talking" movie? The world really doesn't need to know.
  • XenoCorpse
  • 9 mai 2006
  • Permalien

Deeply unsettling, hopelessly inept and really boring.

At least the second film in this god-awful trilogy had the benefit of being so bad and inappropriate it was unintentionally hilarious. This scattershot, occasionally offensive, always unsettling and very dumb film is one of the most boring cinematic experiences in recent memory. The side plot of dogs, (how'd they score DeVito and Keaton, both of whom were doing much better that Alley or Travolta at this point in their carreers?), is useless; the 'dad is hard at work' subplot is just recycled from the second film, (they even use the same dream gag), and the plot doesn't really exist. And why does everyone keep ragging on Travolta's carreer? Being a pilot is no easy feat!

Travolta and Alley, who seem to get along in real life, seem to repel each other onscreen; maybe because they're platonically inclined to each other in reality; onscreen they're like two positively charged magnets pushing each other apart. On top of all that, the casual misogyny throughout is grating and extremely distasteful. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
  • GrantKanigan
  • 26 nov. 2018
  • Permalien
3/10

Meh

I really like the first film, it was hilarious, cute and relatable. The second wasn't as good, but it still had charm. Look Who's Talking Now was a complete flop. Listening to the dogs talk instead of the babies completely ruined it. It might have been a little bit interesting, but they picked the wrong voices for the dogs and I didn't find the dialogue very funny. It was nice that they had the original cast, but the story in the film was less interesting compared to the others. It wasn't fun seeing John Travolta become serious instead of his goofy self. The kids and Mollie seemed to be an after thought in the film. The main focus was on the dogs which wasn't very interesting and it was on James with his new job and boss. The film lacks in its humour leaving it kinda boring as the story isn't very interesting.
  • AngelHonesty
  • 4 avr. 2021
  • Permalien
3/10

struggling to reclaim any originality

The Ubriaccos are back. James (John Travolta) get a new job as a pilot for entitled Samantha (Lysette Anthony) who is the president of a major company. Meanwhile, Mollie (Kirstie Alley) gets laid off from her accounting job. Mikey and Julie get 2 new dogs. Rocks (Danny DeVito) is a mutt and the runt of the litter from the dog pound. Daphne (Diane Keaton) is a spoiled pedigree poodle from Samantha.

The family is now bland. The kids are not as compelling without their gimmick. It seems like the movie is struggling to find something to happen to the family. I do mean struggle. It has way too many stupidity. I don't get why there's a dream sequence with Julie and Charles Barkley. It seems like filler. The dogs get sporadic screen time in the first half. I expected that the dogs would be in the home right away but the first half is wasted. Once the family unites with the dogs, it gets the expected kids with dogs mayhem. I keep thinking that there is a better story. The story is more like a sitcom. It should have been a fun family fare. I am bored with the dream sequences. This is like watching an unstable house of cards completely collapse. Then it takes a hard turn at the end that doesn't fit any of the rest of the movie.
  • SnoopyStyle
  • 19 avr. 2015
  • Permalien
2/10

Thank heavens this was the last one…..

  • callanvass
  • 7 janv. 2011
  • Permalien
2/10

It's not a good movie.

There are no two without three, and after two films, a third was made to finish a trilogy that had already begun to derail in the second film. This film, in fact, was a desperate effort to recover from the bad step, but it ended up definitively burying any vain idea of a future fourth film. The film is weak, and if we compare it to its predecessors, it becomes even more tiring. The biggest problem is an erratic and poorly written script, but the weak and naked jokes also detract from the film, which never really captures our interest.

In this film, Mollie and James are taking care of two grown-up babies, but they face financial and marital difficulties from the moment she is fired and starts to stay at home, forcing James to accept the job offer of Samantha, a young and rich seductress who will try to break their marriage, leading to several jealousy fights and a climate of instability in the home. At the same time, they decide to adopt a street dog, who is the main protagonist of this film, and who will start talking to Samantha's poodle, in a funny rivalry relationship. As in any romantic comedy, it is predictable that everything will end well, between several twists and turns.

The cast continues to include John Travolta and Kirstie Alley, but both are shadows of what they were in the first film. There is virtually not a minute where they come close to the performance previously achieved. Both seem aware that this movie is a mistake and shouldn't have been made, or at least it shouldn't have been made the way it was made. The dogs' voice is provided by veterans Danny DeVito and Diane Keaton, and they try to do everything they can to defend their work, but the material they've been given is bad. Lysette Anthony just doesn't do more than be annoying.

Technically, it's as bland and uninteresting as the others: the cinematography doesn't bring anything new or particularly remarkable, and the sets and costumes are pretty much what we'd expect to find. The soundtrack is good enough, but it doesn't justify watching the movie at all.
  • filipemanuelneto
  • 22 juin 2022
  • Permalien
3/10

Look Who's Talking Now!

  • jboothmillard
  • 12 oct. 2022
  • Permalien
6/10

The movie is for kids! (I love Dogs movies so it for me as well)

Third movie in the series, kids talk on there own now, now it the dogs turn to talk.

I grew up talking dogs, So I never really Grown out of these kinda of movies.

I love them, I also really enjoyed this movie,

This movie was very funny for both parents and kids, there are really great jokes that really work.

However this movie as some Xmas moments but never really felt like Xmas movie. all the way thought.

Decent Family movie, I love dogs, you will enjoy this more.

6 out of 10
  • atinder
  • 29 nov. 2012
  • Permalien
3/10

It exists, it has no reason to, and I've already forgotten about it.

James (John Travolta) and Mollie Ubriacco (Kirstie Alley) continue to raise their rambunctious children, Mikey (David Gallagher) Julie (Tabitha Lupien). With the holidays approaching James attains his dream job as a pilot for executive Samantha D'Bonne (Lysette Anthony) at the same time Mollie is laid off from her accounting firm. With Christmas approaching Mikey soon discovers a man taking off his Santa beard leading him to no longer believing in Santa, meanwhile Mollie becomes insecure with James' frequent absences and finds herself feeling paranoid that James and Samantha are inching towards an affair. Through additional circumstances they also find themselves taking in two dogs, rough and tumble mutt Rocks (Danny DeVito) and pedigreed and refined poodle Daphne (Diane Keaton).

With Look Who's Talking becoming the fourth highest grossing film of 1989, 1990 gave us the inevitable sequel a mere 14 months after the first film. Domestically the Look Who's Talking Too made $47 million, well short of the $140 million of its predecessor most likely due to its unfortunate release between two similarly targeted films Home Alone and Kindergarten Cop being released before and after it. Thankfully the for Tri-Star the film did quite well internationally making an estimated $73 million in foreign territories. While short of the juggernaut the first film was, Look Who's Talking Too made enough for Tri-Star to greenlight one additional entry. Kirstie Alley was initially reluctant to return as Mollie with initial drafts intending to kill the character off between movies and positioning Travolta's James as a single father looking to get back in the dating scene. Executives nixed this idea early on and new directing/writing team Tom Ropelewski and Leslie Dixon approached Alley again and convinced her to return having worked with her on the movie Madhouse. With the children now old enough to speak in story, the writers instead put the inner monologues in the heads of two dogs adopted by the family. This franchise has long since worn out its welcome, and despite a cast with charisma and charm, even they can't hold up a film made that has nowhere to take its characters.

Pretty much everything in Look Who's Talking Now it feels like it belongs in a sitcom. The setup is like a sitcom, the stakes are like a sitcom, even the plots and relationships feel like they belong are suited in a sitcom. There's no real plot in this movie as like the second film it's just a bunch of "mini-plots" duct taped together into something that superficially resembles a full film. Most of these plots like the rambunctious pets, the children doubting Santa Claus, or the paranoia about a loved on having an affair with a "sexy" boss, co-worker, or prospective client, all of these have been used as premises for sitcom episodes. Yes these plots have been used in good films, but when they're done there they're typically given more weight and substance in either character or thematic material. Here however, because they're all "subplots" they're all given surface level (at best) treatment and these characters are so flat and one note there's nothing that can be mined from this material. Kirstie Alley's Mollie continues to have her neuroses dialed up to exaggerated levels and Travolta's charm is no longer carrying his good natured doofus character who doesn't have anything to do except smile and reject the advances of Samantha, enough plot for a 22 minute TV episode really stretched in a 90 minute movie. Diane Keaton and Danny DeVito voice the inner monologues of the family's two dogs Daphne and Rocks and even these two talented performers can't elevate this material. Like how Look Who's Talking Too had the misfortune of being released between Home Alone and Kindergarten Cop, Look Who's Talking Now had the misfortune to be released 9 months after a much better talking dog (and cat) movie with Disney's Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey giving a much better take on this kind of material by having a full narrative rather than just stapling some stock plots together and giving us an artificial climax involving wolves that feels artificial, unearned, and manipulative. And that "believing in Santa" subplot culminating in the most hackney cliché you can imagine where the existence of Santa is made is "definitively made".

Look Who's Talking Now limply concludes the inexplicable trilogy of comedies built upon inoffensive mediocrity that suckered people in the first time with a gimmick of rambling ADR from a celebrity voice and ran that into the ground well before the second film was even released. I'm not even mad at it, because it's like getting mad at the series finale of a show you didn't even like in the first place. I could at least appreciate elements of Amy Heckerling's commentary or observations in the first film, even the first film had glimpses of "hmm, that's okay I guess", but Look Who's Talking Now is just nothing. It probably doesn't even deserve this level of analysis.
  • IonicBreezeMachine
  • 25 mars 2022
  • Permalien
8/10

The low rating is undeserved

  • BeccaGudd
  • 12 nov. 2018
  • Permalien
6/10

Dumb but Funny

This was an ok sequel, that was better than the first one. Although some of the sequences were ludicrous, it was still entertaining throughout. I give Look Who's Talking Now: 6.5 out of 10. Rated PG-13 for sexual/crude humor, thematic elements, and language.
  • MovieFan983
  • 29 déc. 1998
  • Permalien
2/10

Dogs think in English, apparently

No mute mutts here, please!

As the family grows they acquire pets. Dogs. And we get to hear exactly what's going through their minds as we journey through life with Man's Best Friend.

So it is animals in this one but to be honest it really feels like two films too far. It isn't a humourless film but the concept is spread so thin that it isn't an easy movie to like.

Some credit to the editor for putting it together and Diane Keaton and Danny DeVito do their best.

Things to look out for: Finding a new 'doggie' in the wild, umm, there wasn't a fourth movie, Kirstie Alley dressed as an elf, umm

If you are a huge fan of the original you'll like this but really not worth rewatching, watch once.
  • Harlekwin_UK
  • 7 mai 2023
  • Permalien

En savoir plus sur ce titre

Découvrir

Récemment consultés

Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
Obtenir l'application IMDb
Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
Obtenir l'application IMDb
Pour Android et iOS
Obtenir l'application IMDb
  • Aide
  • Index du site
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Licence de données IMDb
  • Salle de presse
  • Annonces
  • Emplois
  • Conditions d'utilisation
  • Politique de confidentialité
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, une société Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.