[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Suryavanshi

  • 1992
  • 2h 41min
NOTE IMDb
4,4/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Suryavanshi (1992)
ActionFantaisieHorreurRomance

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn archaeologist unearths an underground palace at Sangramgarh. The locals are afraid of what will happen if they start digging and would like to leave the past alone. It turns out their fea... Tout lireAn archaeologist unearths an underground palace at Sangramgarh. The locals are afraid of what will happen if they start digging and would like to leave the past alone. It turns out their fears we confounded.An archaeologist unearths an underground palace at Sangramgarh. The locals are afraid of what will happen if they start digging and would like to leave the past alone. It turns out their fears we confounded.

  • Réalisation
    • Rakesh Kumar
  • Scénario
    • Kulwant Singh Jani
    • Rakesh Kumar
  • Casting principal
    • Salman Khan
    • Amrita Singh
    • Sheeba Agarwal
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    4,4/10
    1,3 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Rakesh Kumar
    • Scénario
      • Kulwant Singh Jani
      • Rakesh Kumar
    • Casting principal
      • Salman Khan
      • Amrita Singh
      • Sheeba Agarwal
    • 15avis d'utilisateurs
    • 1avis de critique
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos10

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 7
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux25

    Modifier
    Salman Khan
    Salman Khan
    • Vicky…
    Amrita Singh
    Amrita Singh
    • Rajkumari Suryalekha
    Sheeba Agarwal
    Sheeba Agarwal
    • Sonia
    • (as Sheeba)
    Saeed Jaffrey
    Saeed Jaffrey
    • J.B.
    • (as Saeed Jaferey)
    Ajit Vachani
    Ajit Vachani
    • D.D.
    Sushma Seth
    Sushma Seth
    • Rajmata
    • (as Sushama Seth)
    Puneet Issar
    Puneet Issar
    • Mahesh
    • (as Puneet Esaar)
    Abhinav Chaturvedi
    Abhinav Chaturvedi
    • Ajit
    Kader Khan
    Kader Khan
    • Baba
    Shakti Kapoor
    Shakti Kapoor
    • Rajguru
    Tom Alter
    Tom Alter
    • Tom
    Usman Khan
    Parvez Khan
    Swami
    Anjana Mumtaz
    Anjana Mumtaz
      Randhir Singh
      Shaka Sampang
      Kaka Sharma
      • Réalisation
        • Rakesh Kumar
      • Scénario
        • Kulwant Singh Jani
        • Rakesh Kumar
      • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
      • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

      Avis des utilisateurs15

      4,41.3K
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10

      Avis à la une

      4ajmalsaleem-05887

      Not your standard horror film but is worth a watch

      Watched this when I was a kid it was good movie by that time standards I remember watching it and being scared but it wasnt a movie that sticks long in memory watched it on tv recently again and found I got bored but that's because in this time and age we expect horror to be different then back in 1993 it was love stories and romantic stories mixed with horror.
      7GypsiB

      At Times Silly, but Overall Entertaining

      The wicked princess Suryalekha (Amrita Singh) falls in love with the one man who is able to defeat her champions. This man, Suryavanshi Vikram Singh (Salman Khan) deceives her, then leaves her in disgrace. Incensed, she kills herself and her ghostly self torments the area as she waits for Suryavanshi to be reborn and return to her.

      Hundreds of years later, an archaeologist uncovers part of Suryalekha's palace. His team, including his daughter Sonia (Sheeba) and son-in-law Vicky (Salman Khan), visit the palace grounds. Suryalekha's spirit is convinced that Vicky is Suryavanshi reincarnated and calls to him. It is left to Sonia to overcome the evil with her love and protect her husband.

      This is, at times, a silly movie, and sometimes overly dramatic. That said, it's still an enjoyable tale, full of action, romance, the supernatural, and music. There is much more to the plot that can be explained in a brief synopsis, and the romance was a good story. Singh was fantastic as the beautiful and evil Suryalekha, and Sheeba's portrayal of the opposing pure and lovely Sonia was equally good. Both of Khan's characters were less than three-dimensional, but still appealing. The most unfortunate aspect of the entire movie was the light brown hair/beard of Suryavanshi, which looked simply goofy on Khan. The music and choreography were good, as were the costumes for these numbers. Overall, while bordering on the ridiculous in parts, it was an entertaining movie and a good example of the Bollywood of the 1990s.
      10s-harjeet96

      A must Watch movie

      May be people during 1992 were not used to watch this kind of movies. But guys, this is really one of the best movie i have ever seen. What i liked most was the script of the movie and obviously the role of Amrita Singh, she was amazing in the film. Sheeba looked very cute in the movie and obviously Salman Khan - no words for his great acting. I have seen this movie 5 times. It always look great. If people have not seen this movie yet, I will recommend them to see it. Horror, Action, Romance, Good script, Music - everything is in the film. One of the great horror films. Even today you can enjoy the story. Enjoy and have a great fun watching this movie.
      6nadkarnisumeet

      Amrita Singh rocked in negative role.

      Suryavanshi review :

      Long before Akshay Kumar's similar titled film was to hit theatres, his close competitor Salman Khan had starred in and as Suryvanshi - Bollywoods take on the Gladiator - with bit of punar janam formula thrown in.

      Salman and the sexy Sheeba get married but prefer to remain "friends" only and sing songs until they travel to the ancient palace which is haunted by Salman's past life lover Amrita Singh. The atrupt aatma wreaks havoc in the newly weds life. A similar plot was handled before by Raj Kumar Kohli in Bees Saal Baad (1988).

      Of the cast, Amrita Singh was superlative as the ghost queen. Sheeba looked extremely hot and sexy in the film especially in the sensous song with Salman. But somehow, Sallu Bhaijaan did not fit in to the Gladiator inspired role as he was too young to carry it off in 1992. This film should've been made in 2010s when the star had matured enough to pull off anything and everything.

      Overall, not a bad film at all but sadly, Suryavanshi didnt work at the ticket windows. I saw it on VHS on first day of its release and enjoyed it.

      Regards, Sumeet Nadkarni.
      10anyaay666

      A delightful watch when you are 12

      Well where do I start. As a kid I loved this movie. I give it 10 to compensate for its poor rating of 4 where it languishes currently(it probably deserves a 6.5 tho) Getting back; what not does this movie have: a sinister palace(which was btw archaeologically excavated/discovered), roving spirits, rebirth, and the triumph of righteousness. Of courses some of the sub-plots in the story line are corny, esp. regarding the palaces' dark past but who cares.

      This movie was unique when it was made, a rarity in bombay cinema at that time. It has salman khan in the spankingly good form, and a plot to put 'the mummy' at shame. Okay not quite, but c'mon, it deserves credit for being bold, suspenseful, and so very appealing to a kids fantasy. I suggest people actually watch it before judging it by its rating here. And remember it was released in 1992, so don't expect a visual spectacle. Though considering that, you would be surprised to see how good it looks.

      Vous aimerez aussi

      Kurbaan
      4,2
      Kurbaan
      Love
      6,1
      Love
      Kahin Pyaar Na Ho Jaaye
      4,4
      Kahin Pyaar Na Ho Jaaye
      Jaagruti
      4,7
      Jaagruti
      Chaand Kaa Tukdaa
      3,9
      Chaand Kaa Tukdaa
      Veergati
      5,8
      Veergati
      Jaanam Samjha Karo
      4,8
      Jaanam Samjha Karo
      Chal Mere Bhai
      4,7
      Chal Mere Bhai
      Dil Tera Aashiq
      4,9
      Dil Tera Aashiq
      Chandra Mukhi
      4,0
      Chandra Mukhi
      Auzaar
      4,6
      Auzaar
      Ek Ladka Ek Ladki
      5,8
      Ek Ladka Ek Ladki

      Histoire

      Modifier

      Le saviez-vous

      Modifier
      • Anecdotes
        Deepak Malhotra was offered the lead role but declined as Yash Chopra wanted told him not to.

      Meilleurs choix

      Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
      Se connecter

      FAQ

      • How long is Suryavanshi?
        Alimenté par Alexa

      Détails

      Modifier
      • Date de sortie
        • 7 février 1992 (Inde)
      • Pays d’origine
        • Inde
      • Langue
        • Hindi
      • Aussi connu sous le nom de
        • Sunflower
      • Lieux de tournage
        • Khandala, Maharashtra, Inde
      • Société de production
        • Sainath Films International
      • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

      Spécifications techniques

      Modifier
      • Durée
        2 heures 41 minutes
      • Couleur
        • Color

      Contribuer à cette page

      Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
      Suryavanshi (1992)
      Lacune principale
      By what name was Suryavanshi (1992) officially released in Canada in English?
      Répondre
      • Voir plus de lacunes
      • En savoir plus sur la contribution
      Modifier la page

      Découvrir

      Récemment consultés

      Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
      Obtenir l'application IMDb
      Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
      Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
      Obtenir l'application IMDb
      Pour Android et iOS
      Obtenir l'application IMDb
      • Aide
      • Index du site
      • IMDbPro
      • Box Office Mojo
      • Licence de données IMDb
      • Salle de presse
      • Annonces
      • Emplois
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Politique de confidentialité
      • Your Ads Privacy Choices
      IMDb, une société Amazon

      © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.