Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueDocumentary about the career and eventual death from AIDS of actor Rock Hudson.Documentary about the career and eventual death from AIDS of actor Rock Hudson.Documentary about the career and eventual death from AIDS of actor Rock Hudson.
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 1 nomination au total
Lauren Bacall
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Cyd Charisse
- Charlotte King
- (images d'archives)
Doris Day
- Jan Morrow
- (images d'archives)
Angie Dickinson
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Kirk Douglas
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Linda Evans
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Phyllis Gates
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Rock Hudson
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Burl Ives
- Dr. Brits Jansen
- (images d'archives)
Otto Kruger
- Edward Randolph
- (images d'archives)
Paul Lynde
- Mr. Akins
- (images d'archives)
Dorothy Malone
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Jeff Morrow
- John Doherty
- (images d'archives)
Maria Perschy
- Isolde 'Easy' Müller
- (images d'archives)
Paula Prentiss
- Abigail Page
- (images d'archives)
Avis à la une
This amateurish documentary is a hodge podge of Rock Hudson's life and films cruelly twisting context and clips to suit the tedious narration. Some weird person pretends to be Rock Hudson speaking from the grave and then misuses the clips sought to prove whatever it is the narration has him speak. It is an awful documentary with creepy a host and a mean spiritedness about it all. The misuse of clips is particularly annoying. The terrible quality of the clips makes it worse. This doco is a disgrace. The truly galling thing one is left with is the shoddiness of the source materials and the overall tone of sleaziness is appalling.
This docu (more like a video essay) seems to upset people who think Rock Hudson and John Wayne are the picture of masculinity. It's really funny if you are into looking deeper into movies rather than taking them at face value.
And regarding the quality of the clips, this was made when you only had access to VHS tapes, ffs.
And regarding the quality of the clips, this was made when you only had access to VHS tapes, ffs.
An intriguing project, but by no means a success, this is a reimagining and reinterpretation of RH's body of work with the gift of hindsight about his sexuality and early death from AIDS. The film clips are great fun, and speak volumes about the tension between Rock the Movie Star and Rock the Man. That's the problem - by comparison, the device of the actor impersonating Rock gets in the way, underlining the obvious and forbidding the viewer from drawing his/her own associations. Rock belonged to the last dawning of the studio era and shone gloriously, consistently even in the dopiest and most compromised of his films. This narrator looks/sounds NOTHING like Rock and his presence on camera makes the film look like the grad school project I suspect it is. A shame, because there's a real story to be told, and Rock deserves a stronger stand-in. We miss you, Rock.
Fine if you want to watch the clips, Hudson had a surprisingly large body of work.
Misleading at first, the narrator (who is indeed creepy) suggests that he is presenting Hudson's words that he himself wrote. After 15 minutes I realized not a chance that he wrote this drivel.
The creator of this so called documentary doesn't have much/any respect for the audience and their judgement, or for Hudson himself it seems.
And the premise of people being 'shocked' at his sexuality is a myth. I honestly don't know anyone who reacted in that way. Hudson was a good entertainer in the vehicles he appeared in, not many of which were high brow. But he enjoyed his work, and flashed his lovely smile frequently to show that.
It is senseless to denigrate his life by trying to reduce him to a sexual stereotype, There is a danger in suggesting Hudson was laughing at the general public for being so easily duped. I just don't think he was like that.
Misleading at first, the narrator (who is indeed creepy) suggests that he is presenting Hudson's words that he himself wrote. After 15 minutes I realized not a chance that he wrote this drivel.
The creator of this so called documentary doesn't have much/any respect for the audience and their judgement, or for Hudson himself it seems.
And the premise of people being 'shocked' at his sexuality is a myth. I honestly don't know anyone who reacted in that way. Hudson was a good entertainer in the vehicles he appeared in, not many of which were high brow. But he enjoyed his work, and flashed his lovely smile frequently to show that.
It is senseless to denigrate his life by trying to reduce him to a sexual stereotype, There is a danger in suggesting Hudson was laughing at the general public for being so easily duped. I just don't think he was like that.
Rock Hudson's Home Movies (1992)
** (out of 4)
Director Mark Rappaport has made some rather unique documentaries in his time. He basically takes a subject and twists and turns everything in order to fit whatever story he wants to tell. In this movie he plays the narrator, a person acting as if they're Rock Hudson, as the actor comes out and admits he's gay.
There's no question that this documentary is going to upset many people and it's easy to see why. For starters, it's common knowledge now that Hudson died of AIDS and was gay. This documentary basically takes clips from all of Hudson's movies and twists the dialogue to make it seem that there were "clues" to this in all of his movies.
I will admit that this is a rather well-made film and there's no question that the director is a talented filmmaker who knows how to edit and twist things in order to get what story he is going for. This film is a tad bit silly on one hand because it takes famous movies and takes things so out of context that it's hard to take it too serious. At the same time, twisting the movie's dialogue into fitting some other agenda is what's going to make people most upset.
ROCK HUDSON'S HOME MOVIES isn't a complete success and as I said, I'm sure many will feel it cross the lines. What lines those are will be up to the viewer.
** (out of 4)
Director Mark Rappaport has made some rather unique documentaries in his time. He basically takes a subject and twists and turns everything in order to fit whatever story he wants to tell. In this movie he plays the narrator, a person acting as if they're Rock Hudson, as the actor comes out and admits he's gay.
There's no question that this documentary is going to upset many people and it's easy to see why. For starters, it's common knowledge now that Hudson died of AIDS and was gay. This documentary basically takes clips from all of Hudson's movies and twists the dialogue to make it seem that there were "clues" to this in all of his movies.
I will admit that this is a rather well-made film and there's no question that the director is a talented filmmaker who knows how to edit and twist things in order to get what story he is going for. This film is a tad bit silly on one hand because it takes famous movies and takes things so out of context that it's hard to take it too serious. At the same time, twisting the movie's dialogue into fitting some other agenda is what's going to make people most upset.
ROCK HUDSON'S HOME MOVIES isn't a complete success and as I said, I'm sure many will feel it cross the lines. What lines those are will be up to the viewer.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesIn the closing credits, Crépuscule sur l'océan (1958) is incorrectly credited as "Twilight of the Gods (1958)."
- Citations
[first lines]
Rock Hudson: It was all up there.
- ConnexionsFeatures L'Adieu au drapeau (1932)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Οι ερασιτεχνικές ταινίες του Ροκ Χάτσον
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 3 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant