Avis des utilisateurs

I lap up anything with Emilio Estevez. I've always thought he was extremely underrated. Sometimes, he picks the silliest scripts. I did have some fun with this movie, but It's far from a good movie. The futuristic storyline has been done to death, and nothing really stands out about it. It has some entertaining action, good humor, and a great cast to keep you watching. As much as I love Emilio, he's not really the action star type. That being said, he managed to pull it off with his natural charisma. He borders on cockiness at times, but his charisma manages to keep him likable and easy to root for. Mick Jagger is terrible as the villain. He should have kept his day job, in lieu of dabbling into acting. Anthony Hopkins is here for a paycheck, nothing more. Rene Russo is classy as usual. She takes a one-dimensional part and makes it worthwhile. That's what genuine talent is able to do.

I enjoy it for what it is! Then again, I dig anything that is enjoyably cheesy. This movie falls under that category. They were obviously aiming for much more, but they weren't able to pull it off. Keep your expectations low, and you'll have a decent time

5.5/10

Veteran writer & producer Ronald Shusett scripted this one (along with Steven Pressfield and Dan Gilroy), inspired by the novel "Immortality, Inc." by Robert Sheckley. It's a far cry from the heights attained by "Alien", which Shusett had concocted with Dan O'Bannon, but at the very least it's mildly amusing, the kind of movie for which the phrase "mindless diversion" was invented. It's silly stuff, but delivers a lot of gunfire and a lot of chases, not to mention a tacky visual approach (Joe Alves, production designer on the first two "Jaws" films and director of the third, was the p.d. here). Most of the cast have been better utilized in other projects, but it's still nice to see a bunch of familiar faces here.

Emilio Estevez, not anybody's image of the ideal action hero but reasonably likeable, is race car driver Alex Furlong. Moments before he would have met his maker in a fiery crash, his body is snatched and transported into the "future" year of 2009. Now, for all the other characters, 17 years have passed, but for him the trip is instantaneous. And now he has to run, run, run, since his body is a prized possession for the person who sponsored his "trip", and he's being pursued by relentless "bone jackers", led by legendary rock star Mick Jagger in a blatant case of stunt casting.

Emilio is ably supported by lovely leading lady Rene Russo (who married Gilroy shortly after the movie was released), a slumming Anthony Hopkins (who literally "phones in" his performance), a highly animated and amusing David Johansen as Alex's shameless "friend" Brad, Jonathan Banks of later 'Breaking Bad' and 'Better Call Saul' fame (at his cold-eyed, contemptuous best), Amanda Plummer (a hoot as a gun-packing, computer-savvy nun), Grand L. Bush, Frankie Faison, Esai Morales, John Shea, and Jerry Hall. But, alas, Jagger is one of those classic "don't give up your day job" type of deals: he's simply boring as the antagonist.

Overall, "Freejack" is plenty dumb, but it's dumb enough, noisy enough, and energetic enough to rate as a true "guilty pleasure". The director is the late, talented Kiwi filmmaker Geoff Murphy, who'd previously guided Emilio in "Young Guns II"; in the 80s he did a picture called "The Quiet Earth" that is much more interesting than this junk.

Kicking off the closing credits with a solid Scorpions tune, "Hit Between the Eyes", was one good idea, in any event.

Five out of 10.

In my mind Freejack has always merged with other 90's sci-fi movies like Johnny Mnemonic and Chain Reaction. All of these had cool poster images that were seen in magazines, but other than the posters I pretty much missed out the actual movies.

Another thing that comes to mind is that the phrase "Freejack Soundtrack" is a thing...maybe even more than the actual movie. That's because I had a phase when I was a huge fan of the band Scorpions, and I remember noticing that the song "Hit Between the Eyes" was featured on the soundtrack album of this movie. So I always thought that someday I'm going to see what this Freejack actually is.

Third notion is that this is the gimmick film with Mick Jagger as an actor. I feared that if he happened to be a bad actor, then that would explain why this movie seems so forgotten. Maybe it was a flop?

All right then, let's take a ride to the danger zone and see does Freejack hit between the eyes or miss completely.

The story is original and interesting. A supposed-dead guy is hijacked to the future to be used as a new body for a dying businessman. But the body accidentally escapes, and right there we have a recipe for an action packed chase adventure.

The cast is interesting. Antony Hopkins is probably the best actor in the film but he doesn't have much screentime so it doesn't make much difference. Then we have of course the rocker Mick Jagger as a tough leader of the bad guys' army. Even though Jagger isn't a seasoned actor he looks good in the role and acts decent enough. The hero is played by Emilio Estevez. I've never really liked him. I always thought he's like a poorman's version of Michael J. Fox. But in the end Estevez redeems the role. He manages to use his blank face to create a puzzled character lost in time. The female lead is played by Rene Russo who's always got class.I just like her whenever she's on the screen. One more mention: Jonathan Banks (Mike Ehrmantraut from Breaking Bad!) is in this movie too. That's awesome!

The budget is not enormous but it's big enough and used effectively. I really like the comic book vibe of the visual style, the "futuristic" vehicles that actually just are some army jeeps painted red but... hey, it works! The coolest machine is Jagger's techno-truck that unforrtunately is not seen that much.

Overall Freejack might not be a cinematic masterpiece if judged by indiviudyal acting performances, or if you're looking for some deep message that will change your life. But as an action movie it's really entertaining and stylish, and has an diverse cast of actors that just feels...cool. More than the sum of its parts I'd say.

Oh, and last but certainly not least: you can bang your head and play air guitar during end credits when one of the hardest rocking songs from Scorpions starts playing. Yeaaah!

In 1991's "Freejack", 2009 is a dystopian future where nearly all-powerful corporations rule a ruined environment and a wrecked economy. OK, they got that correct but then again so did the equally cheesy "Robocop". By 2009, humans have mastered the ability to control the space-time continuum to the extent they can draw people forward and replace their minds with another being held in electronic stasis. OK, we haven't really mastered those things yet but damn our telephones have gotten pretty cool. Against this shaky premise "Freejack" puts together a cast that includes the less lunatic of the Sheen brothers, the criminally underused David Johansen, the peerless Anthony Hopkins and, yes, in the Boba Fett role, Mick Jagger. And despite the compelling screen stars, it is Jagger who maintains the audience's eye despite the ridiculous headgear he wears in most scenes and the equally ludicrous haircut beneath. Jagger's charisma nearly carries the film but given that it consists of one extended car (or motorcycle or champagne truck or tricked-out golf car) chase after another after another eventually even his power to charm cannot keep the mind from drifting. During this drifting one wonders why a man with the foresight to run the world's most powerful corporation wouldn't have had a back-up plan to pluck some other body from the past if things didn't work out with the first particularly given that any screw-ups would have meant his death? Anyway, in short, people who like their sci-fi cheap and cheesy or anyone who wishes Mick Jagger and David Johansen had done more movie work will be all-jacked-up by this film.

"Freejack" is a frustrating film. It starts off well and has an excellent premise. But then, well, it all falls apart after that.

When the story begins, Alex (Emelio Estevez) is starting an auto race. However, something extraordinary takes place. As his car flies out of control and he is about to die, his body is stolen from the future. Why? Because in the future, it's not illegal to retrieve bodies from the past just before they'd die anyway. And what do they do with these retrieved bodies? Well, the rich and powerful pay fortunes to have them for organ transplants and even entire body transplants where the consciousness of the dying rich person is implanted into these retrieved bodies....and someone wants Alex's body.

The problem with this procedure is that normally they electrically lobotomize these people....but an attack on the truck that retrieved Alex enables him to escape. Now, lots of bounty hunters are looking to capture him...alive. And Alex has no idea WHAT is going on here!

So why did it fall apart after Alex arrives in the future? Well, there are MANY reasons. First, he is transported from 1991 to 2009 and simply too much has happened during the interim...way too much. Folks in the future drive cars, retrieve folks from the past, and fire phasers that might work if it was the year 2100. Second, there really isn't a lot of story...just action, action, action....making the film a bit mindless. A few things about this future also make no sense...such as the shotgun wielding and cursing nun (Amanda Plummer)! What?! And, finally, the central premise makes no sense. After all, if the retrievers lose Alex...why not just retrieve some other guy from the past?!?! Why is HE so important?! With many millions of deaths between 1991 and 2009, they surely could have found someone else!

I actually saw this on cable back about 1993 and thought it was a pretty cool movie. Well, I just rewatched it in 2021 and think it's pretty dumb. Times do change as do people. Hmmm....1993 and 2021...kinda like 1991 and 2009!

OK, I'm a sci-fi movie buff. So I'm the type of person who'd like this film.

But I do have some basic standards, and Freejack is just the right sort of campy flick, sort of a "Blade Runner" gone slumming. It's bad, but it's a good bad, if you're into cult classics.

Who should see this film:

-- sci-fi movie buffs, but don't go out of your way, oh and see Demolition Man too which is similar but better

-- nobody else

I enjoyed the film, but campy special effects and silly plot mean I can only give it a 6 out of 10.

In 1991, Formula One racer Alex Furlong (Emilio Estevez) is a promising rookie with a loving girlfriend in Julie Redlund (Rene Russo). When Alex Furlong's race car is involved in a fatal collision, Alex is spared death thanks to the efforts of Bonejackers (the movie's name for human gathering mercenaries) lead by Victor Vacendak (Mick Jagger) who teleport Alex to the future of 2009 intent on delivering him to a wealthy client who will transfer his consciousness into Alex's body. When the process leaves Alex conscious, he uses the momentary confusion of the Bonejackers to escape into the dystopian New York of 2009 as a "Freejack" (a man from the past who should have died and is now essentially property) finding 18 years have passed and Julie now working at international conglomerate Mac Corp under Ian McCandless (Anthony Hopkins).

Freejack is a loose adaptation of the 1959 science fiction novel Immortality, Inc. By Robert Sheckley. Written and produced by Ronald Shusett whose credits adorn such genre classics as the first Alien movie and Total Recall the film was a tumultuous production as director Geoff Murphy's initial cut of the film proved disastrous leading to Shusett reshooting 40% of the film. Released in the dump month of January in the U. S., Freejack made only about $17 million against its $30 million budget and only $37 million worldwide making the film a disappointment. The movie was also not well received by critics who unfavorably compared the film to Robocop, Total Recall, and Blade Runner. Freejack takes a promising enough premise and squanders it on dull and generic chase cliches.

The movie wastes no time in getting the ball rolling as Freejack throws the audience into this world it's created with not much prior establishment. After firing past the section set in 1991, the movie zips into the future of 2009 with Estevez' Alex running through standard cyberpunk 101 with corporate greed ruling the world while everyone else on the bottom rung fights for scraps (I think, there's honestly not all that much established regarding the poor and working class of this world other than they wear ragged clothes and shoot at each other). The future isn't all that unique as it's basically a remix of elements from Total Recall, Blade Runner, and Robocop smushed together with no real imprints of its own until the last 10 minutes where it finally plays with the ideas presented by its premise of manufactured and acquired immortality at the broadest and most surface level it can. Despite 18 years having passed between the "present" and the "future", none of the people Alex comes across look like they've aged a day. Rene Russo in particular has a major moment where she tells Alex how nearly 20 years have passed for her, but when they play footage from 1991 Russo's appearances between the two time periods look virtually identical with maybe only her hair being a little different. I will say that Mick Jagger was much better than I expected as the Bonejacker leader Vacendak as there's history of rock stars not doing all that well with genre crossovers (just look at Gene Simmons in Runaway for example) but Jagger despite being a little stiff does lend a bit more humor to the role than I was expecting.

Freejack is a generic sci-fi action thriller that's more concerned with cramming in interchangeable shootouts and chase sequences rather than actually exploring the ideas or themes it presents. There's nothing all that wrong with Freejack, but there's nothing all that right with it either. Freejack is the type of movie that feels like it was tailor made to take up cable air time in 2 a.m. Showings and that's probably the best way you can experience this film.

Auto racer Alex Furlong (Emilio Estevez) has a horrible crash in front of his girlfriend Julie Redlund (Rene Russo). He is kidnapped by Victor Vacendak (Mick Jagger) at the moment of impact and transported into the future known as a Freejack. The US is a dystopian crime-ridden world with McCandless Corp as the biggest and most powerful company. The head of the corporation Ian McCandless (Anthony Hopkins) had died and transferred his mind into a vast computer called the Spiritual Switchboard. Julie Redlund is now a high-power executive in McCandless. When criminals attack Victor's convoy, Alex manages to escape. Victor must hunt down Alex for Ian McCandless who has 36 more hours to transfer his mind into a body.

This is one of those cheesy 90s sci-fi movies. Lots of money and effort had been spent on making the cars look futuristic. It mostly leaves them looking cheesy. The whole thing is a bit of cheese fest. Mick Jagger is interesting as a villain but he never stops being Mick Jagger. There is plenty of action and some car chases. It all adds up to something that isn't quite up to par but has some memorable cheese.

I don't get the hate or negative reputation for this movie. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, however when it comes to films it always seems like the popular opinion of a film is treated as fact and that you have to feel the same way or similarly. There are films that the majority of people think you're apparently "supposed" to love because of the reception and films that apparently you're "supposed" to hate because of the reception and if you go against the general consensus, most will write you off.

I genuinely thought this film was pretty good. Freejack takes place in a wild and dystopian 2009. Apparently this movie was "butchered" and "sabotaged" by the production company. Anthony Hopkins one of the leads even referred to this film as "terrible" years later. Knowing about all of this and the overwhelming negative reviews that this has in general despite having a really talented and well known cast and a big budget, I still went into this definitely wanting to like it but I did have low expectations as well.

Just finishing this after watching it for the very first time I genuinely don't get what's so terrible about this. In my opinion it's genuinely a pretty good dystopian sci-fi movie. Yes the production company interfered heavily with the film and apparently reshot about 40% of the film, however I still don't think it's a bad film because of that by any means. Personally I liked this better than the running man. In my opinion Freejack is a really fun and entertaining movie with great action that I personally recommend.

Race car driver Alex Furlong sensationally crashes his car, although he should be dead, but just before the impact he's transported into the future (the year 2009) by some bounty hunters. The catch is that his body was bought by some corporation boss with failing health, and his plan is to do a mind swap. However Alex escapes, as he tries to survive with the bounty on his head getting larger. He's only chance remains with his back then fiancée Julie, who was there at the horrible crash.

What could have been a fascinating story (who knows, as the novel that it's adapted off might be?) turns out to be a likable, but blandly silly futuristic sci-fi chase (quite a long too) thriller. Not bland in the aspect of well placed thrills, but more so in its lack of bite with it unimaginative story-telling (with set pieces melding it together from other sci-fi prototypes) and witlessly lousy dialogues. It's a predictable smörgåsbord where a lot seems to happen/or work out by chance, but it's made easier by its committed performances and few crafty images. Director Geoff Murphy (behind such films as; "The Quiet Earth" (1985) and the 1995 sequel "Under Siege 2: Dark Territory") keeps it mechanical, but rapidly fast. The backdrop demonstrates a scrappy, bleak and sleazy future for New York and the special effects might look rather wonky now, but they are modestly carried out. Emilio Estevez at first seemed miscast, but grew comfortably in the role and Rene Russo held a strong presence. Mick Jagger doesn't look like he's even trying, but comes off enjoyably meaty (thanks to some choice dialogue). Anthony Hopkins pretty much phones in his performance. Also there are small parts by Grand L. Bush and Amanda Plummer as an unforgettably snappy nun.

The forgotten offering "Freejack" could have made better use of the concept, but nonetheless remains passably entertaining.

You know, one thing that really bothers me is the amount of people who just refuse to relax and watch a move without having to consider whether it should win an Oscar. I don't think Freejack was ever intended to be made for serious viewing - I think every actor in it at one time during the movie has got their tongue in their cheek.

What you do get in this movie are some spectacular effects, and I'm not talking about the end when you could just as soon go get a sandwich rather than watch the 2001-type slideshow.

It's just downright funny. Mick Jagger as the villain giving Emilio Estevez a "headstart" by counting 1-Mississippi, 2-Mississippi is priceless. David Johanson shines as the shyster in any timeframe. Rene Russo gives us an early indication of screen presence. So just relax and have fun with it.

...when he called this a terrible film.

I'd always been under the impression Freejack was considered a decent movie. Where that idea came from I have no idea. The concept could have worked, but as with many science fiction movies there was a lot of razzle dazzle and "ooh, look at that" incorporated for no reason that had anything to do with the story. For example, one of the characters had an obviously scarred face... and there was absolutely no reason for it indicated in the film. This truly was a piece of dog squeeze.

"Freejack" has one of the more unique twists on time travel, with people of the present being snatched away from a certain death to the future. It also begins to develop a unique feel and look to it. However, it's slow in several spots and doesn't develop the imagery as well as it could.

Emilio Estevez didn't seem right for the part, he looked and came across as a kid playing in a role meant for someone older and wiser. Rene Russo is wonderful as always, and Anthony Hopkins does the best he can with his limited character, but both of them are spent on the sidelines.

The real surprise was Mick Jagger, who made a wicked villain. I wonder why he hasn't tried acting in more movies. "Freejack" has largely been forgotten, but it's still worth a look.

A fairly novel and entertaining concept in the time-travel sci-fi genre involving the snatching of bodies from people in the moments before their imminent deaths via some sort of temporal transport beam technology and bringing them 'back to the future' where the subjects' minds are erased and bodies sold sell to a select class of aging geriatric clientele with the means to pay top dollar. All of this taking place against a backdrop of a dystopia America decimated by devastating economic recession, toxic environmental meltdown and persist class Warfare creating a society where there are "people at the top and people at the bottom and no one in between."

By all means this movie should be absolutely fantastic and I was hoping one of my new favorites in the time-travel genre. Unfortunately the writing isn't up to par and the ideas and themes the story presents are not fully explored up to their full potential. The story lacks drama or the elements of a psychological Thriller leaving only the Sci-fi concept to carry the film. Unfortunately this is attempted with boring action scenes that did not keep me wanting to find out what was going to happen next. This movie was a missed opportunity that I would love to see remade today-only much better.

Emilio Estevez is on the run in this not-too-futuristic movie about a Gran Prix driver who dies in a crash out on the race course....or did he? Turns out people can be transported into the future where even Coppertone with UVA sunblock 2,000,000 won't save your skin and it's everyone for themselves. Mick Jagger is the man being paid to deliver him to the man who wants Emilio's body.

The first thing I ask myself is whether this movie is believable or not. The answer is possibly. The way our society is going, we are headed for those kind of planetary results. The movie, from the enjoyment side, is not bad (they could have had a better bad guy than Jagger). But it DOES get me to think: "Is this what we're headed for?" Man! I really hope not!

Geoff Murphy directed this science fiction story starring Emilio Estevez as race car driver Alex Furlong, who is snatched away from certain death in an auto accident from 1991 by technicians from the "future" of 2009, which is a bleak dystopia world where his mind is to be eliminated, and a rich businessman(McCandless, played by Anthony Hopkins) will have his mind transferred into Alex's body, but he escapes, and goes on the run, becoming a wanted man hunted by a determined bounty hunter(played by Mick Jagger) as Alex tries desperately to get out of this bad situation... Mostly inane film has a lot of energy but little plausibility, and now looks foolish and dated.

The stage curtains open ...

"Oh, my God. He's a Freejack!"

I sure do love me some awfully good, early 90's, futuristic, action/thriller movies. "Freejack" (1992) starring Emilio Estevez, Rene Russo, and Anthony Hopkins fits that bill. It is the perfect movie to turn your brain off to and just enjoy for what it is - a mindless, late night, action extravaganza. I saw this in the theaters when it was first released, and I remember liking it. True, it really was pretty bad, but I walked away with a smile on my face, having been entertained for a couple of hours. That's what it's all about.

Alex Furlong (Estevez) is a race car driver who has it all going for him - a beautiful girlfriend (Russo), sponsors who are trying to sign him, and he's one of the brightest rookie drivers on the circuit. But, when his car collides with another, in what should have resulted in his death, he is inexplicably snatched from that moment in time to emerge into a dark, dystopian world where he is being pursued left and right by "bonejackers", who are led by Victor Vesendak (Mick Jagger). He is slowly able to piece together that he is wanted for his clean, disease-free body in a futuristic society that is sick and in serious decline due to pollutiion and drug use. Somebody, a client, paid to have him brought forward into time since he dies anyway, so that they can prolong their own life with Furlong's body. Furlong looks up his girlfriend, and together, they battle the odds for survival.

"Freejack" had a great premise with a poor delivery and with special effects that weren't all that great, to be honest. Then why did I still like this movie? Because it is a lot of fun ... plain and simple. The acting wasn't that good either. In fact, our supporting actors did a much better job in their roles than the headliners did. Amanda Plummer as the gun-toting nun steals every scene she's in. Frankie Faison as the rat-eating homeless man gave us a fun 5 minutes of film time. And, Mick Jagger as the merc hot on Furlong's trail, showed some surprising acting chops, and in my opinion, was the best part of the whole movie.

In one scene, in a seedy cafe, when a man he is watching stops eating and says, "You keep looking at me ... you'll see me kill you." Alex Furlong (just like Billy the Kid from the Young Guns movies), reaches into his coat and puts a gun on the table and smiles at the man. Emilio must've forgot what movie he was in - LOL. Yes, it is a mess, but I still like this movie and would recommended it at 7 stars out of 10. If you aren't one to take your movies TOO seriously, I think you'd like it.

I enjoyed this movie, it was not the best film about a person fleeing for his life, but it had a nice twist to it as a dude who apparently died some eighteen years prior wakes up and is about to get to be a dying rich guy's new body. Well the best laid plans get squashed as the the apparently dead guy is on the run and Mick Jagger is on his tail. Yes, you heard that correctly Mick Jagger and he is surprisingly good as the guy doing the lead chasing. The action is about what you would expect. This movie and the Keanu Reeves movie "Johnny Mneunic" or however you spell it are very similar to me though I have to give the edge to the Reeves one cause it had the more anime look, however this one looks more polished than that one did. The action is pretty good and it has a nice conclusion to it as well. The acting is solid as Emilio Estevez is good as the protagonist and there are a couple of nice scenes with Anthony Hopkins, but then again anything he is in and any scene he is in is usually a good scene. Not much else to say about this one, it is a nice ride though.

Freejack is a poor adaption of Robert Sheckley's novel, Immortality, Inc.

Robert Sheckley's novel was a comedy that tackled some interestingly serious issues. None of those things came through in this movie, which was reduced to a boring sci-fi chase movie.

The only people that might 'possibly' enjoy this movie are fans of Mick Jagger, as you can watch him running around on screen.

Robert Sheckley's work deserves better, as he is one of the best science fiction authors of all time.

There are good films and there are bad films, but my favourite 'genre' seems to simply be 'entertaining' films. I'm sure most people won't be putting 1992's 'Freejack' up there with 'The Godfather' and 'Empire Strikes Back' and there are probably those (mainly professional film critics with no sense of fun!) who would describe it as 'bad.' However, I totally disagree. I enjoyed it so much back when I was a teen and I still smile at it now.

Emilio Estevez plays 'Alex' - a racecar driver who dies in an explosion during a lap in 1992, only to wake up in the (at the time!) 'far flung future' of 2009 where he's been plucked from his own time a split second before his death and now someone wants to use his body for, er, some nefarious purpose.

What follows could probably fall into the 'sci-fi/chase' movie where Alex in on the run in his new surroundings while being pursued by shady forces. Now, I should mention that Sir Anthony Hopkins is on the cast list. But don't get ideas of some great 'Hannibal Lecter' performance. He's pretty much just an extended cameo. We also have Rene Russo as the 'love interest' and, like so many roles, she is only really there for the romantic element and doesn't really get much in the way of character development. However, the best 'actor' is not one of these heavyweights.

The ever awesome Mick Jagger (yes, not really known for his 'acting') is the black leather-clad henchman, in charge of a small private army of futuristic goons hell-bent on brining Alex's body in for... you'll find out what. Now, he's no actor. And it shows. I'm not going to say his performance is 'fantastic,' only that you're guaranteed to remember it for all time. The film may actually be 'average' to most, but Jagger's swagger as the henchmen is pure cinematic gold. He steals every scene - sometimes menacing, sometimes comical, always brilliant and is worth the film's run-time alone.

Nowadays, I've seen 'Freejack' has developed a small cult following in the sci-fi community and many have put it in the 'so-bad-it's-good' category. That may be true to a degree (especially when discussing Mr Jagger!), but I think it's actually a good little action, sci-fi B-movie.

Don't be too hard on it and just enjoy the ride as it's very well put together and covers quite a few sci-fi concepts that are actually quite original. Plus, when I watch it now I also realise that I've been watching 'Mike' from 'Breaking Bad/Better Call Saul' in this film for all these years and I never realised.

This picture surfing on the waves of post apocalypse era which have a bunch of them in previous decade, but in this future has a rupture of the society between rich and homeless due the economic crisis, first all Estevez is totally miscating for the role maybe more appropriate for Tom Cruise or mature actor, the future is presented by new kind of cars, ludicrous idea indeed, the best things are Jagger and the sexy Rene Russo in glorious days, an enjoyable flick very underrated by IMDB's users, certainly a second look could be necessary!!

Thanks for reading.

Resume:

First watch: 1997 / How many: 2 / Source: TV-DVD / Rating: 7.