NOTE IMDb
6,4/10
23 k
MA NOTE
Un étudiant de première année retourne à Los Angeles pour les vacances à la demande de son ex-petite amie, mais découvre que son ancien meilleur ami a une dépendance à la drogue qu'il ne maî... Tout lireUn étudiant de première année retourne à Los Angeles pour les vacances à la demande de son ex-petite amie, mais découvre que son ancien meilleur ami a une dépendance à la drogue qu'il ne maîtrise pas.Un étudiant de première année retourne à Los Angeles pour les vacances à la demande de son ex-petite amie, mais découvre que son ancien meilleur ami a une dépendance à la drogue qu'il ne maîtrise pas.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Anthony Kiedis
- Musician #3
- (as Cole Dammett)
Avis à la une
To keep this review short, sweet and to the point, this film completely missed the point that the novel made. As a 25 year old, I consider the novel one of the defining works of my generation and I had hopes for the film adaptation to be remotely faithful to that. It wasn't. In all fairness to the plot, it has been a couple of years since I read the novel, but it is clear that much was discarded in translation with the intention to present the film in the light of an anti-drug piece. The novel however was far more nihilistic than that and focused on the banality life for the over privileged elite. As I recall, several elements were retained in the film from the novel, but it felt like two completely different stories. I'm generally kind to adaptations and remakes in regards to view them independently of the work in which they're based, but this one was such a let down that I had a hard time not yelling at the television. That said, the film itself, ignoring the novel as much as humanly possible, was pretty middle of the road. The storytelling was shallow and clear-cut with little left up to the imagination and aside from a young Robert Downey Jr and James Spader, acting performances were marginal. It would be interesting to see this film remade by a director (and screenplay writer) that actually retains the vision that Ellis painted so vividly in his novel, but until then take this film with a grain of salt and read the novel instead. I give it a very generous 6/10.
I'll start saying that I haven't been in LA at that time and I didn't read the novel, so my impressions are of someone just watching the movie.
I was moved by Robert Downey Jr. Performance, it definitely raised this movie above what it was on its own.
The very ending really bothered me though, it felt silly, unrealistic and forced. It was quite disappointing and I felt like it ruined the story. I could see what happened coming it's only that how it happens is just stupid and a bit ridiculous.
Still, I enjoyed the movie, it kept me interested throughout and again, Downey's performance was heart breaking.
I was moved by Robert Downey Jr. Performance, it definitely raised this movie above what it was on its own.
The very ending really bothered me though, it felt silly, unrealistic and forced. It was quite disappointing and I felt like it ruined the story. I could see what happened coming it's only that how it happens is just stupid and a bit ridiculous.
Still, I enjoyed the movie, it kept me interested throughout and again, Downey's performance was heart breaking.
Still plenty of relevant themes in this one. They could probably do a remake with some success. Robert Downey Jr obviously the breakouts are in this. It also introduced me to a great song, hazy shade of Winter.
I lived in L.A. in the Eighties and remember the club scene with a chill. From Eddie Nash's joint on Hollywood Blvd[The Seven Seas] to Club Lingerie to the small venues in Long Beach and Orange County, this movie catches the ennui like a manic firefly in a jar. From the 'powder' in the ladies' room to casual sex, it shows it as it was--callow and shallow and a line/hit away from degradation and death.
It's heart-breaking to watch Robert Downey Jr.'s character surrender his dignity to a free base pipe. Other posts complain about the James Spader's performance, but he was dead on. Pushers are not nice people. This is an early cinematic example of truth about the nature of drug addiction. Are you frightened? NOT FRIGHTENED ENOUGH!
Scare yourself straight tonight. Watch 'Drugstore Cowboy', 'Less than Zero', and 'Rush'.
Here's hoping that Robert Downey Jr.'s talent will not be eclipsed by his addiction. He's an amazing actor. ['Chaplin' & 'Restoration' alone earned him a place in cinematic history.]
It's heart-breaking to watch Robert Downey Jr.'s character surrender his dignity to a free base pipe. Other posts complain about the James Spader's performance, but he was dead on. Pushers are not nice people. This is an early cinematic example of truth about the nature of drug addiction. Are you frightened? NOT FRIGHTENED ENOUGH!
Scare yourself straight tonight. Watch 'Drugstore Cowboy', 'Less than Zero', and 'Rush'.
Here's hoping that Robert Downey Jr.'s talent will not be eclipsed by his addiction. He's an amazing actor. ['Chaplin' & 'Restoration' alone earned him a place in cinematic history.]
Good story, made even better by Robert Downey, Jr & I'm my view, James Spader as the villain, as he does it so convincingly. I have a thing for young Spader so that made this movie all the more enjoyable for me. Soundtrack & aesthetic are so wonderfully done. Style & substance throughout. One of my favourite 80s films!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesRobert Downey Jr. plays a drug addict in the film. This proved prophetic, as he suffered drug and alcohol addiction in later life. He recalled: "Until that movie, I took my drugs after work and on the weekends. That changed on Neige sur Beverly Hills (1987), the role was like the ghost of Christmas future. The character was an exaggeration of myself. Then things changed and, in some ways, I became an exaggeration of the character."
- GaffesWhen Julian uses a credit card to open the sliding glass door at his parents' home it's obvious that there is no latch or lock where he inserted the card when the door opens.
- ConnexionsFeatured in The Bangles: Hazy Shade of Winter (1987)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Less Than Zero?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Corrupción en Beverly Hills
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 8 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 12 396 383 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 3 008 987 $US
- 8 nov. 1987
- Montant brut mondial
- 12 396 383 $US
- Durée
- 1h 38min(98 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant