NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
164
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAfter a horrific shooting incident, a small town votes to allow a mass arming of the citizenry.After a horrific shooting incident, a small town votes to allow a mass arming of the citizenry.After a horrific shooting incident, a small town votes to allow a mass arming of the citizenry.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
J. Winston Carroll
- Detective
- (as Jay Winston Carroll)
Avis à la une
I don't argue about the topic, the message supposed to be brought here, I won't. I know that in the USA, the problem of fire arms is a real issue, bigger than anywhere in the civilized world. The ending is interesting too. But the directing and acting are terrible. Not terrific, TERRIBLE; Especially the action sequences, with slow motion and BLOODLESS, shooting scenes. Laughable, except that did not make me laugh at all. So lousy, this picture made for TV stinks the worst eighties fashion, as haircuts and music score. But not that bad either, if you consider the overall job. I repeat, the problem is the characters, acting and shooting scènes.
I recall watching this MOW when it was on originally, which may have been the only showing of it to a national audience. Even at my young age (IMDb calls this movie 1986; I seem to recall it was earlier), in my early teens, I distinctly recall thinking that people just don't act the way they were depicted in this movie.
The basic crux is this -- a grieving father never wants anyone else to lose a child to a gunman, so he pushes to have carry laws in his town liberalized so that all citizens may carry a gun. The idea is that armed citizens can fend off a criminal's attack.
Of course, what ends up happening is that every little verbal spat ends up in a shooting, and the town is in chaos. The POINT, as if no one can figure it out, is that guns turn otherwise rational people into mentally depraved, frothy murderous lunatics.
It was a silly display. Just because you CAN kill someone doesn't mean you'd try, no matter how flippant he's being about your fender-bender. Most people know the difference between a heated argument and lethal violence; even if they'd be inclined to throw a punch, they're not going to take it to the level of death.
Much to the producers' chagrin, of course, subsequent to the movie, many states liberalized their carry laws, and instead of this morass of carnage, crime in each of those states experienced an immediate, dramatic, and permanent drop in crime. The fender-bender shootings never materialized (with one notable exception of which I'm aware -- between two women. Draw your own conclusions). In fact, several municipalities throughout the country have gone the extra step of REQUIRING gun ownership, and they are among the most crime-free anywhere.
This movie was made as propaganda for an extremist political agenda, and nothing more. Thankfully, no one remembers it -- because that's all it's worth.
The basic crux is this -- a grieving father never wants anyone else to lose a child to a gunman, so he pushes to have carry laws in his town liberalized so that all citizens may carry a gun. The idea is that armed citizens can fend off a criminal's attack.
Of course, what ends up happening is that every little verbal spat ends up in a shooting, and the town is in chaos. The POINT, as if no one can figure it out, is that guns turn otherwise rational people into mentally depraved, frothy murderous lunatics.
It was a silly display. Just because you CAN kill someone doesn't mean you'd try, no matter how flippant he's being about your fender-bender. Most people know the difference between a heated argument and lethal violence; even if they'd be inclined to throw a punch, they're not going to take it to the level of death.
Much to the producers' chagrin, of course, subsequent to the movie, many states liberalized their carry laws, and instead of this morass of carnage, crime in each of those states experienced an immediate, dramatic, and permanent drop in crime. The fender-bender shootings never materialized (with one notable exception of which I'm aware -- between two women. Draw your own conclusions). In fact, several municipalities throughout the country have gone the extra step of REQUIRING gun ownership, and they are among the most crime-free anywhere.
This movie was made as propaganda for an extremist political agenda, and nothing more. Thankfully, no one remembers it -- because that's all it's worth.
Since this movie was made, the majority of states have passed right to carry legislation and more people than ever now carry firearms. What is the result??? Crime continues to go down. Anti-gunners again missed their mark and history once again proves that firearms in the hands of citizens protect liberty and freedom as well as preventing crimes.
This movie was a typical example of the efforts of anti-gun leaning activists attempting to scare the non-gun owning public from gun owners. The idea that law abiding Americans will suddenly start killing each other in mass numbers just because they own a firearm is absurd. States with the highest percentage of gun ownership has the lowest amount of violent crime. Areas of the U.S. with very strict gun control laws (like New York, Washington DC, Maryland, Illinois, California) has the highest percentages of violent crime.
This movie was a typical example of the efforts of anti-gun leaning activists attempting to scare the non-gun owning public from gun owners. The idea that law abiding Americans will suddenly start killing each other in mass numbers just because they own a firearm is absurd. States with the highest percentage of gun ownership has the lowest amount of violent crime. Areas of the U.S. with very strict gun control laws (like New York, Washington DC, Maryland, Illinois, California) has the highest percentages of violent crime.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis movie was said to have been inspired by a 1980 incident in which several people were shot and injured and murdered in a robbery at Los Angeles' Bob's Big Boy restaurant on December 14, 1980.
- GaffesLawrence, Kansas exists, but there is no "St" Lawrence anywhere in Kansas.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant