Amanda demande à son fils John de se rende à son laboratoire pour détruire les notes sur ses dernières expériences et ce qui concerne son "frère" qu'il n'a jamais connu. Mais le collaborateu... Tout lireAmanda demande à son fils John de se rende à son laboratoire pour détruire les notes sur ses dernières expériences et ce qui concerne son "frère" qu'il n'a jamais connu. Mais le collaborateur d'Amanda ne l'entend pas de cette oreilleAmanda demande à son fils John de se rende à son laboratoire pour détruire les notes sur ses dernières expériences et ce qui concerne son "frère" qu'il n'a jamais connu. Mais le collaborateur d'Amanda ne l'entend pas de cette oreille
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Bunky Jones
- Nell Valentine
- (as Bunki Z)
Benjamin J. Perry
- Porsche Driver
- (as Ben Perry)
Avis à la une
After three years in a coma, Amanda Hollins awakens and tells her son, John. To destroy her life experiments and any information found in her secluded old house. He heads there with his girlfriend, some work colleagues and one of his mother's admirers. They eventually discover more then what they bargain for, as some of his mother's genetic engineered creations run amok.
I thought I've seen this one before, but I was wrong. This modest combination of 50's sci-fi / horror goes onto deliver a undervalued oddity, with a tip-top ensemble cast and sure-handling from dual directors Jeffrey Obrow and Stephen Carpenter. Suspense is lacking because the minimal story is just too typical and shredded with loopholes, but it's the surprisingly efficient make-up effects, which are over-the-top and horrifically creative that makes for a pleasurable treat. The excessive use of this icky business in some wicked (and at times silly) set pieces is the film's only real imaginative bone. A quick tempo, builds up after a slow opening and the shocks are well placed for maximum effect. Be it a laugh or a gasp. The material mostly plays it with a straight face, with slight slabs of humour and Rod Steiger's small meaty turn. The composed performances (with Steiger being the exception) are reasonably good from the cast. David Allen Brooks is likable in his steadfast delivery and the ravishing Amanda Pays shines in her shifty portrayal. Talia Balsam gives hearty support and Peter Frechette diverts. The classy Kim Hunter also gets some minor scenes as Amanda Hollins. Obrow and Carpenter's directorial style is systematically sturdy without an ounce of any visual flourishes. The look of the film generates a gloomy air, mainly due to Steven Carpenter's murky photography and dim lighting. David Newman's moody, understated music score is fairly unnoticeable.
I thought I've seen this one before, but I was wrong. This modest combination of 50's sci-fi / horror goes onto deliver a undervalued oddity, with a tip-top ensemble cast and sure-handling from dual directors Jeffrey Obrow and Stephen Carpenter. Suspense is lacking because the minimal story is just too typical and shredded with loopholes, but it's the surprisingly efficient make-up effects, which are over-the-top and horrifically creative that makes for a pleasurable treat. The excessive use of this icky business in some wicked (and at times silly) set pieces is the film's only real imaginative bone. A quick tempo, builds up after a slow opening and the shocks are well placed for maximum effect. Be it a laugh or a gasp. The material mostly plays it with a straight face, with slight slabs of humour and Rod Steiger's small meaty turn. The composed performances (with Steiger being the exception) are reasonably good from the cast. David Allen Brooks is likable in his steadfast delivery and the ravishing Amanda Pays shines in her shifty portrayal. Talia Balsam gives hearty support and Peter Frechette diverts. The classy Kim Hunter also gets some minor scenes as Amanda Hollins. Obrow and Carpenter's directorial style is systematically sturdy without an ounce of any visual flourishes. The look of the film generates a gloomy air, mainly due to Steven Carpenter's murky photography and dim lighting. David Newman's moody, understated music score is fairly unnoticeable.
Well-made (almost) for 1987. Nothing much to talk about aside the scientific experiments leading to creatures formation with big suspension of disbelief. The music is too loud, the situations not that tense for (all) the protagonists, only for some who really got "dirtied" in the process with one very interesting partial transformation.
Aside those, the quality was really shocking even for 1987, taking in account that Alien was a masterpiece born in 1978. So after 9 years being served that 'Kindred' was not so lubing and satiating.
Aside those, the quality was really shocking even for 1987, taking in account that Alien was a masterpiece born in 1978. So after 9 years being served that 'Kindred' was not so lubing and satiating.
- Screenplay/storyline/plots: 4
- Production value/impact: 5.5
- Development: 6.5
- Realism: 6
- Entertainment: 5.5
- Acting: 6
- Filming/photography/cinematography: 6.5
- VFX: 7
- Music/score/sound: 5.5
- Depth: 6
- Logic: 2.5
- Flow: 5.5
- Horror/sci-fi/thriller/drama/scientific experiments: 6
- Ending: 4.5.
The Kindred is just a monster movie-no more, no less. While not being Rod Steiger's finest moment (or wig), it does offer up a slim bit of originality. Steiger plays a mad scientist (what other kind are there?) who is searching for a genetically altered monster, Anthony. Also searching for Anthony are a group of 20-something medical students and one of them could be related him; Hence the title. Then it becomes a formulaic slasher movie with the kids being attacked one by one. It's pretty much downhill from there. The scenes in Steiger's lab are the eeriest and the movie should have spent more time there. The climax stands out and the acting is not bad considering two Academy Award winning "screen legends" were conned into starring in it.
I really enjoyed this movie. It has some really original special effects, i.e. "fish-woman". It has remained one of my favourites. The cast made up of mostly little known actors are all likeable, (even when being obnoxious) and the setting is not your usual sci-fi horror laboratory deal.
If you like a scare, I recommend it and if you do see it and like it you might want to try "From Beyond".
If you like a scare, I recommend it and if you do see it and like it you might want to try "From Beyond".
Another "When science goes bad" themed b-movie film about a son who discovers the extent of his mothers experiments and the creature that lives within the bowels of her home.
Truth be told The Kindred has some good ideas, some of the practical effects are great and it's not entirely awful. Sadly on the flip side it's not very well made, for every decent sfx there is a poor one and the characters are instantly forgettable.
The Kindred is one of those very few films I'd like to see a reboot of, or at least modern sequel. The potential is there, it just needs a budget and a decent team to put all the pieces together.
In it's current form The Kindred is a barely passable effort that I'd advise only big fans of the genre give time to.
The Good:
Some great practical effects
A few good ideas
One decent death scene
The Bad:
Some poor practical effects
Weak construction
Doesn't meet its potential
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Had Japan made this film it would have been an entirely different movie, you know......the tentacles!
Truth be told The Kindred has some good ideas, some of the practical effects are great and it's not entirely awful. Sadly on the flip side it's not very well made, for every decent sfx there is a poor one and the characters are instantly forgettable.
The Kindred is one of those very few films I'd like to see a reboot of, or at least modern sequel. The potential is there, it just needs a budget and a decent team to put all the pieces together.
In it's current form The Kindred is a barely passable effort that I'd advise only big fans of the genre give time to.
The Good:
Some great practical effects
A few good ideas
One decent death scene
The Bad:
Some poor practical effects
Weak construction
Doesn't meet its potential
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Had Japan made this film it would have been an entirely different movie, you know......the tentacles!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWhen Rod Steiger reluctantly took direction for a specific scene from young co-director, Stephen Carpenter, he pulled him aside and told Carpenter, "an actor is the only person whose mistakes are photographed." Carpenter went on to say in interviews that he never forgot this moment, and that it changed he and his co-director's (Jeffrey Obrow) approach to directing.
- Citations
Amanda Hollins: Dear God, he's still living, he's still alive!
- Versions alternativesThe US version of the film is cut for an "R" rating. Cut out were a shot of the monster's tentacle going into a woman's nose, and also the monster opening its belly during its death.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Trailer Trauma 3: 80s Horrorthon (2017)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 2 407 024 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 602 834 $US
- 11 janv. 1987
- Montant brut mondial
- 2 407 024 $US
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant