L'ange de la mort

Weird and funny action in South America film. It is the result of collaboration between two rather bright European b movies masters. And it looks more like Franco's film, than Bianchi's. It is one of those banana super actions, with jungle locations, naked women, senseless story. But it has absurd and drive indeed. It looks like comics in some parts and have lo fi special effects amusement. The characters including Howard Vernon are nice and they make that real-time two-weeks made drive. The fans of Commander Strike, Oasis of the zombies will probably love this super-improvised hallucination etc.

www.myspace.com/neizvest

Now this is a movie that I didn't hear about until getting it in a box set for review from Full Moon thanks to Laura from Scandal Coactive. It is interesting that along with this, I got a borderline softcore porn that was directed by Jesús Franco and seeing that he started directing this, I thought this would be more graphic. Without playing my hand too much, let me get into this.

Synopsis: a Jewish commando unit hunting Nazi war criminals tracks down the infamous Dr. Mengele (Howard Vernon) in the jungle and find that he is torturing nubile young virgins and performing horrible medical experiments on the locals. They prepare to battle their way past Mengele's hordes of fanatic Nazi bodyguards to get him.

We start this off with a vehicle leaving a compound a car tailing them. In the one car is Aaron Horner (Jack Taylor). He is a Nazi hunter and they believe that this guy is Mengele. He is working with Ohmei Felsberg (Fernando Rey) who is back in Europe. There is a showdown outside of town, leaving the guy dead. It doesn't look like this is who they're after though.

That is when we meet Marc Logan (Antonio Mayans) as he is hanging out with his girlfriend, Rachel (Annick Laine). They're watching a television program about the Nazis and that they're taking refuge in South America. It also refers to the murder that we started off with as well. It ends with the hunt for Mengele still ongoing.

There is a break though when Rachel gets a call at work from a former co-worker, Eva (Suzanne Andrews). She wants to meet with her friend. The first time she says that she believes the man she is living with is Mengele but going by the name Carl Hermann. This sparks interest to check out the compound from Marc. Rachel is killed in the process. He starts to recruit people around him. They relay what they believe to Ohmei and Aaron. They need proof though.

I should also say that we see within the compound. Josef's right hand is Wolfgang von Backey (Christopher Mitchum) and there are terrible things being done here. Josef is aided there by Gertrud (Shirley Knight). This group from the village is up against a force stronger than they're expecting as they try to start the 4th Reich.

That is where I'll leave my recap and introduction. Where I want to start is that the synopsis and concept are much better than what we get here. It is odd since the Franco films I've seen in the past tend to be more surreal, full of nudity or violence. This one doesn't get much of any of that. There's a good idea for the basis. The problem I feel is that from everything I've read, this was a troubled production to the point where Franco left the project before it was completed, having Bianchi to step in.

Now that I've set that up, I love the idea of these Jewish commandos looking for revenge and hunting Nazis. I believe that it is common knowledge now that the Nazis fled from Germany as things got bad. The majority went to South America. Using that as a basis is good. I thought that Vernon does good as Mengele. He doesn't play it over the top. He seems like a nice, older gentleman hiding a secret. Having a compound where they're training soldiers is believable. Trying to create the 4th Reich is also not out of the realm of possibilities.

The problem is that this is boring. It struggles to build any tension. I will credit this that they weren't afraid to kill characters. During the climax, which piqued my interest with seeing that. The action sequences aren't great though. There is a guy doing karate and they use slow-motion for him. There is a guy with a crossbow which was a good touch. We have where the good guys shoot someone and they die instantly. I could just tell that this wasn't working with the biggest budget and it is during these that it shows. The cinematography was fine though. I don't think this was shot poorly. There is a great 'theme' to when things get tense. It is a variation on synth-wave that would be prominent in the era. I did enjoy that. The rest of the score fit for what was needed.

Let's then go to the acting, which should be the last thing to look at. It is interesting that I didn't know until seeing this that Robert Mitchum had two sons. One of them is in this movie as Wolfgang. I thought he was solid as this henchmen, Nazi character. Vernon was a good Mengele. There are too many limitations but he was solid. He shifts to being downright evil as this goes on though. Andrews worked as Eva. Rey is in a limited role as this mastermind of the Nazi hunters. Taylor worked as the one who collaborated closely with him. I thought that Mayans was good as our lead. I'll also credit Laine for her limited role. The rest of the cast was fine to round this out.

In conclusion, this isn't a good movie. I'm not sure how much of that is budgetary and if the fact that Franco started this, then left before it was completed. There are good things here. I love exploring the 'what-if' Mengele escaped to South America to form the 4th Reich. This just didn't have the resources to make it fully work. It isn't a bad action film though. I will say that. The acting was solid. This was boring unfortunately. I'd only recommend this as a curiosity for Franco or Bianchi fans. Or if you enjoy low-budget action movies.

My Rating: 4.5 out of 10.

I have the substance release of this film...not great quality but pretty watchable. I can't wait til someone like full moon features rereleases this film and restores it. Great 80s action...extremely cheezy but awesome

This movie is horrible, awful, ridiculous, and stupid. I advise everyone to watch it immediately. It has anti-climactic kung-fu slow motion sequences, outraged Jewish circus performers, and evil monkey/human nazi experiments. Watch this and I promise you will be dumber after having seen it. You will probably drop out of college or high school once you behold the magic that is Angel Of Death (aka Commando Mengele). Oh yeah, it was written by Jess Franco and directed by Andre Bianci (Burial Ground: Nights Of Terror).

Oh, how visibly low-budget this is. It's immediately detectable in the extra excitable cinematography, curt editing, uneven sound design, oddly meek costume design, and "yeah, no, that's good" direction. To these facets add dialogue, scene writing, characters, and exposition that are Just So, and sometimes laughably perfunctory. The story is passable in the most uselessly broad of strokes, and plot development, but it really feels like after a basic concept was pitched, the rest of the screenplay was cobbled together just to loosely assemble a picture around it. All this definitely does reflect in turn on the acting, and it often comes across that the players are Just Getting By, or in sometimes plainly overacting - though in some cases I'm unsure if they're simply not very good at their trade. True, one may expect such qualities from movies that Jesus Franco was involved with, in varying proportions, but still 'Angel of death,' also known as 'Commando Mengele,' readily shows itself to be a viewing experience only for ardent fans of the filmmaker or the blithely curious. And even then, let me be frank: it's not recommendable.

I do like Norbert Verrone's music, though some of it is weirdly repetitive, and other themes are peculiarly out of place. The filming locations are lovely. I'm unclear whether it's Franco or Andrea Bianchi who is to be credited as director (or maybe both?), but while that aspect is seemingly content with a single take of every moment, it's technically proficient. For the most part this isn't outright bad, just unmistakably weak owing both to limited resources and limited skills. Yet when the question turns to the screenplay whipped up between Georges Friedland and Marius Lesoeur in addition to Franco, the whole absolutely falls apart right in front of our eyes. 'Angel of death' at least maintains a steady pace, such that it seems to go by rather quickly. Yet "cobbled together" really does feel like the best phrase to describe the plot; the premise seems clear enough, but it belies a story that in actuality is thin, almost haphazard in its construction, and roundly unconvincing in multiple capacities. The movie doesn't inspire excitement so much as it does considerable skepticism: characters come together in flimsy fashions, and we never get a clear idea of who they are; scenes are written and executed with the tack of "sure, that'll work"; specific advancement of the narrative is marginally slow and a little oblique. Some shots are repeated while others have no purpose; some moments are repetitive as they are employed, and others are needlessly embellished with slow motion; no few small details decidedly raise a quizzical eyebrow.

It sounds promising from the outside looking in, but it doesn't take long to start forming an unfavorable impression, and that impression is only augmented and confirmed as the feature progresses. The single most admirable element here might be the practical effects, but what is that saying? The action-oriented climax is reasonably well done (though still not written well), but by that point, does it matter? 'Angel of death' comes off as a production where all involved were doing the bare minimum, and even at that, either not especially trying, totally incapable, or so restricted by the resources available to them as to give off those airs. "I suppose that'll do" was apparently the order of the day, but whoever was managing the project, they were emphatically mistaken, for the final cut is one instance after another of dubious craftsmanship. As indisputably fishy as some story ideas or otherwise inclusions are, somehow as the title enters the third act it still manages to become even more shady. To be blunt, my favor waned more and more over these ninety minutes until watching ultimately became a chore. There was some potential in the concept, and in a scattering of the notions herein, yet by and large the end product might the worst possible rendition of that concept. I congratulate those who get more out of the feature than I do, but the number of people who could earnestly enjoy it is surely very small. Leave 'Angel of death' for Franco devotees and those who, for better or worse, will watch anything; everyone else, move along.