[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Scandal

  • 1989
  • 12
  • 1h 55min
NOTE IMDb
6,4/10
5,8 k
MA NOTE
Joanne Whalley in Scandal (1989)
DrameL'histoireDrame politique

D'après le scandale Profumo de 1963, une liaison entre une danseuse exotique et le ministre de la Guerre secoue le gouvernement britannique.D'après le scandale Profumo de 1963, une liaison entre une danseuse exotique et le ministre de la Guerre secoue le gouvernement britannique.D'après le scandale Profumo de 1963, une liaison entre une danseuse exotique et le ministre de la Guerre secoue le gouvernement britannique.

  • Réalisation
    • Michael Caton-Jones
  • Scénario
    • Michael Thomas
  • Casting principal
    • John Hurt
    • Joanne Whalley
    • Bridget Fonda
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    6,4/10
    5,8 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Michael Caton-Jones
    • Scénario
      • Michael Thomas
    • Casting principal
      • John Hurt
      • Joanne Whalley
      • Bridget Fonda
    • 40avis d'utilisateurs
    • 20avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total

    Vidéos2

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:56
    Official Trailer
    Scandal
    Clip 1:08
    Scandal
    Scandal
    Clip 1:08
    Scandal

    Photos65

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 58
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux61

    Modifier
    John Hurt
    John Hurt
    • Stephen Ward
    Joanne Whalley
    Joanne Whalley
    • Christine Keeler
    • (as Joanne Whalley-Kilmer)
    Bridget Fonda
    Bridget Fonda
    • Mandy Rice-Davies
    Ian McKellen
    Ian McKellen
    • John Profumo
    Leslie Phillips
    Leslie Phillips
    • Lord Astor
    Britt Ekland
    Britt Ekland
    • Mariella Novotny
    Daniel Massey
    Daniel Massey
    • Mervyn Griffith-Jones
    Roland Gift
    Roland Gift
    • Johnnie Edgecombe
    Jean Alexander
    Jean Alexander
    • Mrs Keeler
    Alex Norton
    Alex Norton
    • Detective Inspector
    Ronald Fraser
    Ronald Fraser
    • Justice Marshall
    Paul Brooke
    Paul Brooke
    • Detective Sergeant
    Jeroen Krabbé
    Jeroen Krabbé
    • Eugene Ivanov
    • (as Jeroen Krabbe)
    Keith Allen
    Keith Allen
    • Kevin
    Ralph Brown
    Ralph Brown
    • Paul Mann
    Ken Campbell
    • Editor of Pictorial
    Iain Cuthbertson
    Iain Cuthbertson
    • Lord Hailsham
    Susannah Doyle
    Susannah Doyle
    • Jackie
    • Réalisation
      • Michael Caton-Jones
    • Scénario
      • Michael Thomas
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs40

    6,45.8K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    7mjneu59

    sex and politics in swinging London

    The British have always enjoyed this kind of masochistic self-scrutiny, and what better wound to scratch than the notorious Profumo affair? The sex and treason scandal toppled England's conservative government in the early 1960s, and cost the life of at least one man: London doctor and celebrated freethinker Steven Ward, who enjoyed the heady, highbrow thrill of life in high places and understood how the quickest way into the corridors of power was through the pants of the men at the top. John Hurt manages to pull a sympathetic character out of the doctor's unsavory reputation, and freshman director Michael Caton-Jones recreates (with pitch-perfect sleaze) the boozy, lascivious mood of early '60s sex and politics. The details would have been compelling even without so much trendy visual overkill, but a little stylistic embellishment is to be expected in a film condensed to feature length from a proposed five-hour television miniseries. And although the script by Michael Thomas says nothing about power and privilege that isn't already common knowledge, it's nice to be reminded of the all-too human animal lurking just behind the typically English stiff upper lip.
    6natashabowiepinky

    Nothing Has Been Proved...

    What seemed shocking in the 50's is almost commonplace in the debauched 21st Century, so to get a proper perspective on how controversial this was, one would probably have to have been alive during the period. In the absence of possessing a time machine though, one can only guess the outrage at the revelation that British MPs had secret sex parties and slept with prostitutes. WOW! If there is a similarity between now and then though, it's seems to be the determination of the tabloid press to publish as many lurid headlines as possible, regardless of how many lives they ruin. Vultures, the lot of 'em.

    For such a saucy role, it's surprising that Joanne Whalley-Kilmer doesn't show much skin... Apart from the most obvious use of a body double ever. Never mind, her co-stars more than make up for it on that score, including a rather young Bridget Fonda, fumbling with an English accent. John Hurt and Ian Mckellen complete an impressive cast, who tackle their roles with gusto and make it an engaging ensemble piece.

    I enjoyed it as an exposé of the morals and hypocrisies of a Britain on the verge of the Swinging Sixties, but was never truly engrossed. Nowadays, in a world where a woman can build a business empire based on one sex tape, you just know that everyone involved in this tawdry affair would be big reality TV stars. A sign of the times indeed. Sigh... 6/10
    7ccthemovieman-1

    The Good & The Bad Of 'Scandal'

    I didn't expect much out of this when I was saw it about 15 years ago, but it turned to be quite interesting. The only problem was it has too much a sleazy feel to it and an obvious political agenda, which is not unusual in films. The agenda is almost always one way.

    There is a lot of nudity in here, lots of it mainly with Bridget Fonda who plays "Mandy Rice-Davies" and Joanne Whalley-Kilmer as "Christine Keeler." Whalley-Kilmer looked particularly beautiful.

    John Hurt as "Stephen Ward" and Ian McKellen "John Profumo" are the males. The story is about Britain's "Profumo Affar," as it was labeled back then - a sex scandal involving English politicians in the early 1960s.

    In what could be a dry account turns out to be a fascinating movie, well-acted and beautifully-photographed. I've seen it three times and the third was probably the last. By then, the titillation of the nudity had worn off and the bias of yet another Liberal agenda bashing conservatives (it's same all over in the world of film-making) got a bit annoying. That, and the fact that had no English subtitles on the DVD, was disappointing.
    9paul2001sw-1

    Much ado about nothing, well done

    Viewed from the 21st century, the Profumo affair seems much ado about nothing, a sex scandal of an altogether more innocent age. Put to one side the marginal security issues, and all that is left is a bit of bad behaviour among the aristocracy, and to be frank, if you choose not to shoot these people, you can't really expect for anything more. It did leave one serious casualty, however: Stephen Ward, procurer of girls to the upper classes, who committed suicide after being abandoned by his friends when the going got tough. 'Scandal' tells his story, and manages to be reasonably sympathetic to Ward, Christine Keeler (the girl who slept with Profumo) and even (to some extent) the minister, although the facts don't quite seem to support the continuing strength of the bond between Ward and Keeler as depicted. The portrait of the early 1960s is well judged (without the film ever feeling overly historical), and there are interesting insights into the semi-professional sexual relationships between the smart set and the girls on the make they adopted. But the best thing about 'Scandal' is really the acting. A distinguished array of British character actors perform their turns impeccably; and Joanne Whalley, while never quite looking eighteen, is a dead ringer for Keeler and always nice to look at. But in his own way, John Hurt (who plays Ward) is also great to look at, in his case because of his straightforward excellence as an actor. In his hands, Ward is an essentially mediocre man; and yet charming, far from wicked and ultimately tragic. In some senses, the whole affair provided a template for the subsequent portrayal of the private lives of politicians by the press, to the extent that today it would hardly make the waves that it did at the time. But this film goes far beyond historical reconstruction, and is well worth watching in spite of the relative triviality of the events is portrays.
    8loza-1

    So this is what it was all about.

    I remember the names of the people involved when I was a kid. I had no idea what the Profumo Affair was all about, so I was very interested in seeing the film. Names from my childhood kept cropping up: Christine Keeler, Stephen Ward, Lucky Gordon. I was able to see the whole thing played out before me. Most of what is shown is historically accurate. It is certainly true that the osteopath Stephen Ward was hounded to his death by the British establishment.

    Of the performances John Hurt was excellent as Ward. Joanne Whalley Kilmer has been criticised for a two dimensional performance. I don't agree. She had decided to play the part of someone who is essentially shallow (however deep the real Christine Keeler might or might not be) and makes a fair fist of it. I thought that Roland Gift was OK as Johnny edgecombe - although at the time I thought he was supposed to be Lucky Gordon.I thought that Leslie Philips was going to be a disaster as Lord Astor, but he was excellent.

    The problem of having lived through the period is that when it is portrayed on film, you can see all the mistakes in fashions and background. This film is no exception.

    The music is quite apt - in one case (see below) spot on - and I thought that the truly appalling rendition of "She Wears Red Feathers" in the night club scene was very atmospheric.

    Someone else pointed out the scene as the girls are dressing while The Shadows play "Apache." That scene stimulated me, too. If you can, watch this scene in a cinema. Watching stockings been drawn on on a big screen while Tony's bass drum, Cliff's Japanese drum, then Jet's bass come rolling out of those gigantic cinema speakers is an experience not to be missed - believe you me!

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      This movie narrowly escaped an X rating in the U.S. because of some questionable footage during the Cliveden House orgy scene. Closer scrutiny revealed that two extras were having real sex on a piano in one of the background scenes. Even though the images were blurry, the scene had to be trimmed for all general releases to avoid the restrictive rating, which BBFC censor James Ferman accomplished by defusing the light from a table-lamp in the foreground. The inquisitive-minded will find this sequence about 49 minutes and five seconds into the movie.
    • Gaffes
      A title card says, "One Year Later, 1962," indicating that Profumo addressed Parliament about Keeler that year. Profumo addressed Parliament in March 1963.
    • Citations

      Stephen Ward: All Russians are spies, it's how they're brought up.

    • Versions alternatives
      Original 114-minutes British version was shortened to 108 minutes for the USA theatrical release in order to avoid a X rating.
    • Connexions
      Featured in Wogan: Wogan with Sue Lawley (1989)
    • Bandes originales
      Nothing Has Been Proved
      by Dusty Springfield with Pet Shop Boys

      Written by Neil Tennant (uncredited)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ20

    • How long is Scandal?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 28 juin 1989 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Royaume-Uni
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Skandal
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Lancaster Gate, Bayswater, Londres, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni
    • Sociétés de production
      • Filmax
      • British Satellite Broadcasting (BSB)
      • British Screen Productions
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 7 000 000 $US (estimé)
    • Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 8 800 000 $US
    • Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 658 660 $US
      • 30 avr. 1989
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 8 800 000 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 55min(115 min)
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Stereo
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.