La roseraie

I've seen this movie yesterday. I'm not personally interested in world war II films about concentration camps.

But in this movie the characters acted very dramatic and I feel something different.

Mr. Reichenbacher has a mystery from beginning to the end. During the film you are trying to solve his feelings. The court scenes are very realistic like in a real world.

In these kind of films, the torture scenes are used for making the film more dramatically more than enough. in The Rose Garden yo can see only one scene about the camps and torture scenes...

The movie is not very assertive but finally a good work. I recommend it to drama-lovers.

On the whole, I enjoyed this movie. Set in Germany, Liv Ullman is the defense lawyer for Maximillian Schell. Schell is accused of attacking an elderly man without provocation, although we later find out that the man is in fact a Nazi war criminal. The only hope for Schell may be Ullman's tireless search for justice.

Sometimes the movie is edited in such a way that necessary sequences seemed to have been edited out, for instance the first court scene seemed to jump from one point to the next, seeming to miss something in between the two. You'd see Liv Ullman saying something, and then the scene cuts to something which doesn't relate to what she had just been saying, creating confusion.

At times, the movie is highly frustrating - the court scene again, where the plaintiff's lawyer is basically badgering and shouting at defendant Maximillian Schell, and it kept making me want to tell the lawyer to shut up and leave poor Maximillian Schell alone. I know that this kind of behavior wouldn't be tolerated in American court, but the movie is set in Germany (I think, because to be truthful, no locations are ever mentioned except for the times that Ullman sets off for Hamburg).

There are problems with this movie, but they're not overwhelming. Overall I would recommend it, and Liv Ullman gives an outstanding performance.

Schell deserves credit for his ability to express horror through his eyes. This movie is an antiphony of emotion between the horror seen in the eyes of Reichenbach (Schell) and the ever increasing awareness of that horror of Freund (Ullman). Schell draws the audience in and we want to know what he is seeing... what is so horrific that turns him into a zombie. Yes, the story line might seem somewhat contrived in the beginning of the movie, but Schell's acting makes up for the contrived opening scene. The ending is where the movie shines, not mushy with sentimentalist, but reality. The reality speaks for itself.

This is based on a true story, it is a pity that it is still not available today on DVD, I would love to see this film again.

But I do remember watching it with a damp handkerchief, and thinking their is not much justice in this world, but hopefully the guilty will get their just deserts in the afterlife, at least thats whats keeps me sane when watching this film.

It looks a little dated now, but the acting is very good as you would expect from these outstanding actors, what can I say, 10 out of 10.

When the film makers take a real story and overload it with details that don't make any good to the main topic it's a sign of failure.

Even the brilliant actor Maximilian Schell could not play that drivel. I met hundreds of Holocaust survivors. I had them among my family and friends. My in-law survived Auschwitz after he saw how his mother and little sisters were taken to the gas chambers. However, none of those people who went through unthinkable suffering behaved in such a crazy manner that Maximilian Schell shows to us.

The court proceedings in this movie are highly impossible. And the side story about two successful lawyers who are unable to find a babysitter for their daughter is just laughable.

It's a pity that an excellent team of movie makers lost a great opportunity and produced a cheap soap opera that is instantly forgettable.