La légende de la forteresse de Souram

It's a great film which has scenes like paintings. The music is remarkable. Therefore, both visually and aurally it is a marvelous journey to the Georgian folklore. It also conveys very good messages. The main theme is the suggestion that the patria could only be defended, if some sacrifices their lives for its defense. Blood becomes the cement, in other words. The fortress constitutes a metaphor of the patria, which was vulnerable at that time to the invasions of the two major empires: Ottoman and Safavid. In this context, religion is the main theme of patriotism, which differentiate the majority of the Georgians from the outsiders. There are also so many connections to the folk tales of both Turkish and Iranian culture. One is the character Zurab who rebels against his father because he leaves his patria, thus, his religion. This reminds us the character Zohrab in Shahname of Firdawsi, who fought against his father.

On the other hand, the political context and the director's position in that context is also felt in the choice of making such a movie. The Soviet system was disintegrating and the director is also one of the victims of the Soviet regime long before this movie's production.

a Paradjanov. surprising for its force. and as part of a terrible fight against political system. a fairy tale. preserving the light, the pain, the fascination, mystery and force of the source. and the desire to present a testimony about sufferance. that fact transforms The Legend of Suram Fortress in more than beautiful film or embroidery of symbols. because, using motifs who are parts of a folk chain from Balkans to Caucasus, it gives to the sacrifice new connotations. it is not exactly a revenge or expression of sketch of artistic freedom but precise definition of relation who remains basis of power.each theme of Paradjanov's cinema is present in this bitter, delicate gem. like colors of a portrait who redefines the spaces from a drawing.

Way. Search of essence. This world against faith. Death. And the way is not over. Sacrifice as soul of a city. End of circle. Gift of reconciliation. Result - movie as amber sea.Every wave - part of a ladder. Every beach - skin for ambiguous dreams. Every boat - bridge to understand roots of gestures and happiness. An experience and golden peach. As each film by Paradjanov. Basic truth and force of love. As parts of a fairy tale in which end is more than happy. It is fly of soul, leaf of peace, finish of a long trip, answer to old questions, testimony of innocence and rain for new crops.The death of Zurab is same than Manole's Ana sacrifice. The hero is only crumb of huge bread of saints and ancestors. His body is proof. For motherland love. For God sage, For things who must exist behind particular lives . For lost dramas. A film about religion as reflection of a family history

Full review on my blog max4movies: Ambavi Suramis tsikhitsa (international title: The Legend of Suram Fortress) is the fictionalized retelling of an ancient Georgian tale about a fortress that could only be built with a human sacrifice. Visually, the movie looks wonderful with vibrant colors, perfectly arranged set pieces, and a striking choreography. And while the plot remains mostly simple and central aspects and characters even seem obscure, the heavy use of symbols give the movie a dreamlike quality. Certain scenes - although aesthetically pleasing - seem to lack a clear connection to the plot, which is why the overall allegory about political oppression will remain vague for some viewers.

Sergei Parajanov has the most personal style of all directors I know of. He firmly established this style with his films "Shadows of our forgotten ancestors" (1965) and "The color of pomegranates" (1969).

The leaders of the Soviet Union didn't like his style. It didn't fit in with their opinions about (the role of) art (in society). Parajanov spend the '70s and early '80s mostly in jail and labor camps convicted on diverse false accusations.

When he was released in the '80s Parajanov started a second phase in his career. "The legend of Suram fortress was the first film in this second phase. In a book about the history of film I read about this second phase "and he made another three films". That is in my opinion too short a summary and does not do justice to "The legend of Suram fortress. It is true however that "The legend of Suram fortress" is not an artistic break from previous films. Parajanov does not break new grounds in the second phase of his career.

Just like in earlier films "The legend of the Suram forttress" is visually hypnotizing. His images are deeply rooted in old mythical and religious stories and icons. This also means that the plot is hard to follow for Western eyes. The film is more a series of "tableaux vivants" than chapters of a story.

In the films of for exampls Sergei Eisenstein you can sometimes guess that underneath his hstorical stories there was criticism on the current situation. "The legend of the Surem fortress" is plotwise too inaccessible to conclude that it contains hidden criticism on the way the Soviet Union had treated Parajanov in the past decade.

From all the "tableaux vivants" in the movie I was charmed most by "The prayer" and "The passage of time". The way Parajanov uses the close up in these tablaeux is really beautiful.