Van de koele meren des doods

This film is almost as good as it's original (the book). I would even dare say it might very well be one of the best Dutch movies of all time. The line-up is great, all actors are still working as an actor, but most of them never came near this achievement again. Where ever you may be from, it really would be worth your while to trace this film and watch it.

Granted, I never read the book, so maybe it does the book a disservice. That said, I thought the acting was very good. I see that some people on here think the acting sucked, but the acting is outstanding. The dialog may have some weak scenes, but overall, I didn't find it unnatural or clumsy. I've seen bad examples of both ( just watch a lesser known 50's Hollywood film noir on YouTube... you'll see what I mean). The part where the pianist goes down on Hetty is unrealistic though; it takes way longer to bring a woman to orgasm that way. Just sayin'. Lol Anyway, at face value, I really thought it was worth watching. Also, beautiful photography.

This is a rather splendid film which has been forgotten by film history. Because it is Dutch, it has gone by quite unremarked, although it was a success on release. This is European 'art-film' at its best: high quality, well written and expertly directed. And superbly entertaining at that. But most of all: a stunning performance from lead actress Soutendijk, who could and should have gone on to greater things. For about ten years, she appeared in challenging and often demanding roles in remarkable Dutch and German films (Meisje met het rode haar, Vierde Man, Spetters, Wo immer du bist). Then she went to America and blew it. Nowadays, European art cinema is dead and she's left making TV-fare. A cinema that has no room for the talents of Soutendijk is quite dead and buried. See this magnificent film at all costs.

"Ridiculous." That is about the only word that can be used to describe this wreck of a movie. The dialog is awful, the acting even more so. It is just completely and utterly unbelievable. Not one second could you take the main character seriously. Yes, she is quite disturbing in the book too, but the movie just completely ruins her character. The acting is so bad, it's almost hilarious, but unfortunately, this movie really isn't supposed to be a comedy.

This movie should not have been made. If you enjoyed the book by Frederik van Eeden, please do not harm yourself by watching this atrocity. That is, of course, unless you thoroughly enjoy movies with bad dialogue and bad acting.

(1982) The Cool Lakes of Death/ Van de koele meren des doods (In Dutch with English subtitles) PSYCHOLOGICAL COSTUME DRAMA

Adapted from the novel by Frederik van Eeden, co-written and directed by Nouchka van Brakel that has Hedwig mistreated by relatives and her father after catching Typhlitis and it killing her own mother. He does this by making sure Hedwig would have a strict religious upbringing. From the time her mother died when she was a young child to the time she becomes an adult as she is played by Renée Soutendijk. Her full name believe it or not is "Hedwig Marga de Fontayne" after she was passed on to be raised from her father to relatives. And after she meets an lowly inspired artist, Johan Tereijde (Erik van 't Wout) who used to be an orphan who would often profess his love for her, she then chooses to wed a much more wealthier soldier aristocrat, Gerald Johannes Hendrikus Wijbrands (Adriaan Olree) we soon find out he is only married to her in principle and is also impotent. And during their loveless marriage, it is not long before she catches the attention of a pianist, Ritsaart (Derek de Lint) who often stays with Joop (Peter Faber) the artist Hedwig's first love interest was, Johan was a protege. And while Hedwig and Ritsaart were acting as husband and wife, she then made the mistake by opeing her big mouth about the forbidden affair to the worse gossiper even though she was still married to her first husband. And as a result cost him many piano concert gigs, for as a result of some unfortunate circumstance, lead her to be addicted to morphine. Can she pull herself out of it.

Released one year before the highly critically acclaimed "the Fourth Man" directed by Paul Verhoeven, the movie is okay except that we've seen this all before. The difference is that the time periods are different, and women in general were more repressed during 1870's. The ending of this movie is reminiscent to 1979 "My Brilliant Career" starring Judy Christie and Sam Neil which i felt is way more superior and inspiring.