Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA professional assassin is coerced into taking on one last job.A professional assassin is coerced into taking on one last job.A professional assassin is coerced into taking on one last job.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
I had to do a double take looking at this one whilst deciding whether or not to see it at this year's Edinburgh Film Festival IMDb voters score it a measly 4.9/10 currently, and yet on the other hand, it's produced by John Boorman, photographed by Henri Decaë, starring Patrick McGoohan and Lee van Cleef, with a soundtrack by Brian Eno? Did all those guys really screw up? The answer is manifestly no, and we have yet another inexplicable IMDb rating, perhaps caused by people voting for a different movie called The Hard Way (there are several)? So the film is shot in the UK, in Ireland, and in Paris, and is just gorgeous. The locations are dingy, all green stains, brown stains, darkness. The script is quite generic, it's about a hit-man (John Connor - McGoohan) who wants to retire but has the "one last job" forced on him, no added value in the plot structure at all. What is really poignant though is that throughout the movie we get a running commentary on Connor's character from his wife in eerie soliloquies. He is a very terse man, who only speaks when absolutely necessary and appears to have no personal connections, except with guns, for which he is an absolute nut. His wife says that he "never knew who he was or what he wanted", which is one of the saddest things I've ever heard, and made me feel quite weepy. He seems to have believed in his family as an abstract concept though and sends them quite unsolicited cheques after each job. His daughters, we are told, are in America doing well, which strangely makes the film quite beautiful, an effect perhaps like a robin flitting through a mouldy cemetery.
You would think in a low budgeter that the action scenes would be quite bad, but in fact they are really visceral and abrupt, done perfectly each time. Van Cleef plays middle man McNeal with whom there has to be a showdown following the refusal to allow McGoohan to retire. He does well but generally appears in the film's weaker scenes. You get the feeling that whoever wrote the script for this one was looking to do something entirely different to Decaë and McGoohan; Tombleson and Grogan the two credited writers have no other writing credits to their names, no idea why Boorman picked the script. There's some claptrap talk about mercenary assaults in Africa which caught the public imagination of the era, and McNeal does implausible juggling acts with the amount of missions on his plate. The final showdown, whilst very beautiful also looks to play on an antagonism between the two men which the film quite simply hadn't established, and wasn't the point of the movie. These men were set up by the movie as soulless automata, Connor capable of rage, but only as a defensive measure, he's the ultimate introvert. Despite the fact that the scriptwriters and the other creative dynamos in the film weren't on the same wavelength, I think it causes only subtle elements of discord to arise and in fact the film feels quite the masterpiece on reflection.
You'll notice that I haven't spoken about director Michael Dryhurst. There must be a story here, because this is the only film he has credit for directing, having been either an assistant director or producer all his career. It seems he took over when original director Tombleson (whom I mentioned also wrote the script) was taken off the movie as the result of a personality clash with McGoohan. It's quite possible that this allowed Decaë and McGoohan to take up the reins, though that's pure speculation on my part.
You would think in a low budgeter that the action scenes would be quite bad, but in fact they are really visceral and abrupt, done perfectly each time. Van Cleef plays middle man McNeal with whom there has to be a showdown following the refusal to allow McGoohan to retire. He does well but generally appears in the film's weaker scenes. You get the feeling that whoever wrote the script for this one was looking to do something entirely different to Decaë and McGoohan; Tombleson and Grogan the two credited writers have no other writing credits to their names, no idea why Boorman picked the script. There's some claptrap talk about mercenary assaults in Africa which caught the public imagination of the era, and McNeal does implausible juggling acts with the amount of missions on his plate. The final showdown, whilst very beautiful also looks to play on an antagonism between the two men which the film quite simply hadn't established, and wasn't the point of the movie. These men were set up by the movie as soulless automata, Connor capable of rage, but only as a defensive measure, he's the ultimate introvert. Despite the fact that the scriptwriters and the other creative dynamos in the film weren't on the same wavelength, I think it causes only subtle elements of discord to arise and in fact the film feels quite the masterpiece on reflection.
You'll notice that I haven't spoken about director Michael Dryhurst. There must be a story here, because this is the only film he has credit for directing, having been either an assistant director or producer all his career. It seems he took over when original director Tombleson (whom I mentioned also wrote the script) was taken off the movie as the result of a personality clash with McGoohan. It's quite possible that this allowed Decaë and McGoohan to take up the reins, though that's pure speculation on my part.
I second the "worth a look" rating. McGoohan and Van Cleef are both excellent and the film makes wonderful use of a few tracks from Brian Eno's Music for Films. It is not action packed, but it is suspenseful just the same.
10emanson
When it comes to dialogue, less is more, in this epic of the unspoken word. Patrick McGoohan, Lee Van Cleef and Irish backdrop make for pleasurable after-pub eye candy. Blink and you might miss nothing - or you might miss everything. See it once and you'll never forget it - no matter how late you got home after the pub. Top stuff.
This is, indeed, a quiet film with little dialog and few characters. Unfortunately, that style of filmmaking relies heavily on expert acting, an extremely sharp screenplay, and top-notch cinematography to succeed. The cinematography was fine. But the rest, not so much. McGoohan and VanCleef were both fine actors. McGoohan made his career by saying as little as possible so he fits perfectly into this style. But when they're asked to actually speak ... ugh. The dialog is generally hackneyed and stiff. The story elements, in general, were quite cliche'd even by 1979.
Overall I'd recommend watching it if you're a McGoohan or VanCleef fan. But otherwise you won't at a loss for missing it.
Overall I'd recommend watching it if you're a McGoohan or VanCleef fan. But otherwise you won't at a loss for missing it.
Sometimes you come across gems not because someone tells you about them or because you saw them of some list, no sometimes gems are discovered by mistake. This movie was one of those movies that Amazon Prime just happen to have and it said i might like because I had recently seen the Charles Bronson movie, The Mechanic. I thought I was going to get a movie long those lines but what I got was something so much better. When you find these kind of gems all you want to do is tell everyone in the world about it.
So what is this British made for TV movie all about? Well John Conner, played by Patrick McGoohan, is a hitman who wants out of the game. Well of course those who need his services can not take no for answers so they force him into another job. When Conner double crosses them, a game of cat and mouse between Conner and his boss, played by Lee Van Cleef, starts. What makes this movie so much different is the production values for again a made for TV movie. The story is well written and the action is never over the top but enough to make the story interesting. Another aspect that adds a touch is an ongoing dialogue from Conners wife as she seems to be speaking to the viewer. Of course the twist is given at the end of the movie which is satisfying.
This movie is by no means for everyone. Some people might find it predictable or slow at times, and I will admit that it is both of those things. But sometimes its good to find movies that have something fresh or new to say and in different ways.
So should you watch this? If you like action movies then I would say that at some point you should watch it. It is not perfect but it is a good little ride that you wont regret.
So what is this British made for TV movie all about? Well John Conner, played by Patrick McGoohan, is a hitman who wants out of the game. Well of course those who need his services can not take no for answers so they force him into another job. When Conner double crosses them, a game of cat and mouse between Conner and his boss, played by Lee Van Cleef, starts. What makes this movie so much different is the production values for again a made for TV movie. The story is well written and the action is never over the top but enough to make the story interesting. Another aspect that adds a touch is an ongoing dialogue from Conners wife as she seems to be speaking to the viewer. Of course the twist is given at the end of the movie which is satisfying.
This movie is by no means for everyone. Some people might find it predictable or slow at times, and I will admit that it is both of those things. But sometimes its good to find movies that have something fresh or new to say and in different ways.
So should you watch this? If you like action movies then I would say that at some point you should watch it. It is not perfect but it is a good little ride that you wont regret.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis was writer Edna O'Brien's only acting role.
- GaffesDuring the target practice scene, the target appears with a grouping of hits in the lower right of the bulls-eye, followed by a shot of a target with a grouping that is all dead center, and finally we see the target with the grouping in the lower right again.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Der bittere Weg
- Lieux de tournage
- Glendalough, County Wicklow, Irlande(Kathleen delivers her monologue)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant