Dracula père et fils
- 1976
- Tous publics
- 1h 36min
NOTE IMDb
5,4/10
898
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn the 1700s, a vampire has a son from a normal woman. The mother dies, and he spends two centuries trying to teach his meek son how to be a proper vampire but no avail. Now they have to fle... Tout lireIn the 1700s, a vampire has a son from a normal woman. The mother dies, and he spends two centuries trying to teach his meek son how to be a proper vampire but no avail. Now they have to flee from Transylvania, and they end up in France.In the 1700s, a vampire has a son from a normal woman. The mother dies, and he spends two centuries trying to teach his meek son how to be a proper vampire but no avail. Now they have to flee from Transylvania, and they end up in France.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
This is not a movie I would consider terrible, since it stars the great Christopher Lee. I was introduced to this movie in a different and strange way, I picked up a copy at a outdoor trading market called "Traders Village" in Fort Worth, Texas in the early 90s when I was probably 12 or 13. I had a thing for the supernatural and in particular vampire movies, so I purchased it on VHS for $3 or so. I had no idea that this was a dubbed foreign movie, but being a young teenager was captivated to watch it multiple times because of the nudity, mainly,at first. Later on through learning who Christopher Lee was, and seeing his characters portrayed in many Hammer horror films, I subsequently returned later to search for what movie I had seen in my youth through nostalgia. Unbeknownst to me at this young age, I had no idea who Christopher Lee was but it probably subconsciously figured into my love for him as an actor in later life, watching his earlier films. LOL. Finding Dracula and Son somewhat difficult to locate, I have ended up here on IMDb, reading the history of the release through the comments section. Though this film may be bad, I look upon it as being special to me and it holds a nostalgic place in my mind and I will always be fond of it.I would recommend watching this just because Christopher Lee is in it, and also it is actually his unique,and last performance as Dracula.
"Dracula and Son" ("Dracula père et fils") is a very, very frustrating movie. There is much to like about it but the film also frustrates to no end and could have been so much better...especially to Christopher Lee's fans.
During the course of this film Lee and his son, Ferdinand, are never called Dracula...though in reality, it's pretty obvious Lee is the title character. Early in the story, Drac (Lee) decides he wants a family, so he finds a bride and they have a son, Ferdinand. Dracula has very bad luck with wives and soon she is dead...and the boy is raised by his monstrous father.
The story then shows young Ferdinand's development over the years...from a budding young sociopath to a rather ineffectual adult who is phobic about blood and killing people. So, Dad is forced to procure 'food' for the young man and they live a reasonably happy existence...until Romania is overrun by Communists and the pair are forced to leave.
On the ship, the two are assumed to be dead sailors in their coffins and the pair are tossed overboard! Ferdinand ends up in Paris and Dad ends up in London. Ferdinand's life is a mess....as he's hungry but too timid to actually bite anyone. As for Dad, however, he lands on his feet and makes a fortune playing vampires in horror films!! What's next? Unfortunately it's a slow, slow descent into a confusing finale and the laughs begin to dwindle when they meet again.
This film looks almost like it was written by two folks who never consulted the other or read each other's scripts. In one, it's a cute comedy. In the other, it's a horror film with a weird Oedipal angle...one that just never works. According to IMDB, this is because the film was severely edited down for the English language version and as a result of ham-fisted editing is a mess....when it SHOULD have been amazing. The bottom line is that I wanted to love the film, and did love a few portions. But the overall effect is confusing and dull...and should have been so much better.
By the way, one neat thing about this French film is that Lee not only played the part in French (one of languages with which he was fluent) and dubbed himself into English!
During the course of this film Lee and his son, Ferdinand, are never called Dracula...though in reality, it's pretty obvious Lee is the title character. Early in the story, Drac (Lee) decides he wants a family, so he finds a bride and they have a son, Ferdinand. Dracula has very bad luck with wives and soon she is dead...and the boy is raised by his monstrous father.
The story then shows young Ferdinand's development over the years...from a budding young sociopath to a rather ineffectual adult who is phobic about blood and killing people. So, Dad is forced to procure 'food' for the young man and they live a reasonably happy existence...until Romania is overrun by Communists and the pair are forced to leave.
On the ship, the two are assumed to be dead sailors in their coffins and the pair are tossed overboard! Ferdinand ends up in Paris and Dad ends up in London. Ferdinand's life is a mess....as he's hungry but too timid to actually bite anyone. As for Dad, however, he lands on his feet and makes a fortune playing vampires in horror films!! What's next? Unfortunately it's a slow, slow descent into a confusing finale and the laughs begin to dwindle when they meet again.
This film looks almost like it was written by two folks who never consulted the other or read each other's scripts. In one, it's a cute comedy. In the other, it's a horror film with a weird Oedipal angle...one that just never works. According to IMDB, this is because the film was severely edited down for the English language version and as a result of ham-fisted editing is a mess....when it SHOULD have been amazing. The bottom line is that I wanted to love the film, and did love a few portions. But the overall effect is confusing and dull...and should have been so much better.
By the way, one neat thing about this French film is that Lee not only played the part in French (one of languages with which he was fluent) and dubbed himself into English!
"Dracula Père et Fils" was never an excellent film. At the most, it was a sometimes funny vampire satire with good psychological aspects out of the Oedipal conflict father/son and sociological criticisms concerning the immigrants, not so well treated in France.
But to be honest, I admit it was a bit of a deception. The film director Edouard Molinaro himself has lately called it a "failure", despite the fact he had succeeded in hiring Christopher Lee to incarnate ' the Count" (Dracula is never mentioned in the original version) opposing him to a totally different kind of an actor (Bernard Menez, who is actually very proud of this film). The concept here is quite similar to another unfunny vampire comedy "Tempi Duri Per i Vampiri" where Lee was opposed to Renato Rascel.
One should see this movie just to appreciate the almost perfect French accent of the British star who has almost entirely shot it in that foreign language.
Mister Lee has claimed on several occasions he did dub the English version.
I must be one of the rare French moviegoers to have seen the quite different American version and to be able to evaluate the mess they did on the soundtrack.
Most of the dialog has been changed to some ridiculous vulgar trash. The haunting music score by Vladimir Cosma has been misplaced or changed in favor of new music bits, supposedly to speed up the rhythm of the film.
But they didn't hesitate the butcher the editing either: from the 100 min. in its original form, they reduced it to 79. Not only they shortened it, but added some repetition of Lee opening a door and speaking to a concierge with several stupid accents. Not only unnecessary, but very dull! This scene was initially part of the story and is suddenly supposed to be an hilarious illustration of movie shooting. Appalling!
I have heard Roman Polanski had to suffer similar treatments on his masterpiece "Fearless Vampire Killers" (never try to compare this one to Molinaro's flick, by the way!)
Not every one has the talent of Woody Allen to transform a Japonese spy movie into a comedy as he did once (admitting it in a prologue) with "What's up Tiger Lily?".
In conclusion, here are two different films out of the same celluloid: "Dracula Père et Fils" is a not so good film worth seeing however. "Dracula and Son" is just awful and should be placed alongside with the Raymon Burr's version of "Godzilla".
But to be honest, I admit it was a bit of a deception. The film director Edouard Molinaro himself has lately called it a "failure", despite the fact he had succeeded in hiring Christopher Lee to incarnate ' the Count" (Dracula is never mentioned in the original version) opposing him to a totally different kind of an actor (Bernard Menez, who is actually very proud of this film). The concept here is quite similar to another unfunny vampire comedy "Tempi Duri Per i Vampiri" where Lee was opposed to Renato Rascel.
One should see this movie just to appreciate the almost perfect French accent of the British star who has almost entirely shot it in that foreign language.
Mister Lee has claimed on several occasions he did dub the English version.
I must be one of the rare French moviegoers to have seen the quite different American version and to be able to evaluate the mess they did on the soundtrack.
Most of the dialog has been changed to some ridiculous vulgar trash. The haunting music score by Vladimir Cosma has been misplaced or changed in favor of new music bits, supposedly to speed up the rhythm of the film.
But they didn't hesitate the butcher the editing either: from the 100 min. in its original form, they reduced it to 79. Not only they shortened it, but added some repetition of Lee opening a door and speaking to a concierge with several stupid accents. Not only unnecessary, but very dull! This scene was initially part of the story and is suddenly supposed to be an hilarious illustration of movie shooting. Appalling!
I have heard Roman Polanski had to suffer similar treatments on his masterpiece "Fearless Vampire Killers" (never try to compare this one to Molinaro's flick, by the way!)
Not every one has the talent of Woody Allen to transform a Japonese spy movie into a comedy as he did once (admitting it in a prologue) with "What's up Tiger Lily?".
In conclusion, here are two different films out of the same celluloid: "Dracula Père et Fils" is a not so good film worth seeing however. "Dracula and Son" is just awful and should be placed alongside with the Raymon Burr's version of "Godzilla".
Count Dracula had a son, by the name of Ferdinand. He's a shy and a good nature young man, not very happy to be a vampire. He don't want to bite people because he don't want to hurt them. So he bites rats and cats. His father becomes a movie star - playing, of course, a vampire - and fells in love with a young woman who reminds him his wife. But Ferdinand's in love with the girl too and don't want his father to bite the woman. Fun story of black humour, with great Christopher Lee making fun of his famous role of Dracula. But images are a little bit too dark and sometimes there's dull moments. Watch for funny lines like: Ferndinand, finish your blood and go to bed. Or : Ferdinand, don't play bowling with your mothers ashes. Good bloody fun could have been better, but it's pleasant to watch,
Now, I happened to stumble upon the 1976 movie "Dracula Père Et Fils" (aka "Dracula and Son") by random chance here in 2024, and it was actually a movie that I had never heard about. But seeing that the movie had Christopher Lee in the leading role, of course there was no doubt about me sitting down to watch it.
However, I didn't know that it was a horror comedy, much less a French movie at that. So I have to say that the movie turned out to be quite something else than what I was expecting. I was, of course, expecting a traditional "Dracula" movie, as it had Christopher Lee in the role, and I was sorely disappointed.
Unfortunately I sat through an English dubbed version of the movie, and a rather bland dub at that. The voice they had for Christopher Lee was nowhere near his full, majestic normal voice. And it just wasn't the same. I actually doubt that having had the original voices wouldn't have mattered much, because this wasn't a great movie.
The storyline in "Dracula Père Et Fils" didn't really entertain me much, truth be told. It was a forced script and there wasn't much comedy to be found. For example, the scene where Dracula bites into the blow-up doll, well, it wasn't funny, it was just cringeworthy. And you have to look even harder for the horror elements.
Writers Alain Godard, Jean-Marie Poiré, Édouard Molinaro and Patrick Cauvin didn't exactly put together a convincing or overly entertaining script.
Visually then the movie was okay. I mean, it was made in 1976, and it shows. But there is something oddly nostalgic to that, now isn't there?
This is not a movie I will ever return to watch a second time.
My rating of director Édouard Molinaro's 1976 movie "Dracula Père Et Fils" lands on a generous four out of ten stars.
However, I didn't know that it was a horror comedy, much less a French movie at that. So I have to say that the movie turned out to be quite something else than what I was expecting. I was, of course, expecting a traditional "Dracula" movie, as it had Christopher Lee in the role, and I was sorely disappointed.
Unfortunately I sat through an English dubbed version of the movie, and a rather bland dub at that. The voice they had for Christopher Lee was nowhere near his full, majestic normal voice. And it just wasn't the same. I actually doubt that having had the original voices wouldn't have mattered much, because this wasn't a great movie.
The storyline in "Dracula Père Et Fils" didn't really entertain me much, truth be told. It was a forced script and there wasn't much comedy to be found. For example, the scene where Dracula bites into the blow-up doll, well, it wasn't funny, it was just cringeworthy. And you have to look even harder for the horror elements.
Writers Alain Godard, Jean-Marie Poiré, Édouard Molinaro and Patrick Cauvin didn't exactly put together a convincing or overly entertaining script.
Visually then the movie was okay. I mean, it was made in 1976, and it shows. But there is something oddly nostalgic to that, now isn't there?
This is not a movie I will ever return to watch a second time.
My rating of director Édouard Molinaro's 1976 movie "Dracula Père Et Fils" lands on a generous four out of ten stars.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis was the tenth and final movie in which Sir Christopher Lee played a vampire Count. Contrary to what the title implied (imposed by the producers after the film had been shot just as 'Père et fils', literally "Father and son"), not once the character was identified nor portrayed as Dracula.
- Versions alternativesOriginal French version ran 96 minutes. 1979 USA theatrical version (co-produced by Bob Dorian) was heavily cut (to 78 minutes), severely re-edited, and dubbed into English using joke voices and deliberately comical dialogue (similar to "What's Up Tiger Lily?")
- ConnexionsFeatured in À deux c'est plus facile (2009)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Dracula and Son?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 36 minutes
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Dracula père et fils (1976) officially released in India in English?
Répondre