[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Effects

  • 1979
  • R
  • 1h 24min
NOTE IMDb
5,3/10
1,1 k
MA NOTE
Effects (1979)
Slasher HorrorHorrorThriller

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhile a small film crew are shooting a low budget horror movie in a house in the woods, the lines between reality and fiction start to blur, and the movie slowly starts to turn into a "snuff... Tout lireWhile a small film crew are shooting a low budget horror movie in a house in the woods, the lines between reality and fiction start to blur, and the movie slowly starts to turn into a "snuff" film.While a small film crew are shooting a low budget horror movie in a house in the woods, the lines between reality and fiction start to blur, and the movie slowly starts to turn into a "snuff" film.

  • Réalisation
    • Dusty Nelson
  • Scénario
    • William H. Mooney
    • Dusty Nelson
  • Casting principal
    • Joseph Pilato
    • Susan Chapek
    • John Harrison
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    5,3/10
    1,1 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Dusty Nelson
    • Scénario
      • William H. Mooney
      • Dusty Nelson
    • Casting principal
      • Joseph Pilato
      • Susan Chapek
      • John Harrison
    • 25avis d'utilisateurs
    • 23avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos24

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 20
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux23

    Modifier
    Joseph Pilato
    Joseph Pilato
    • Dominic
    • (as Joseph F. Pilato)
    Susan Chapek
    • Celeste
    John Harrison
    John Harrison
    • Lacey Bickel
    Bernard McKenna
    • Barney
    Debra Gordon
    Debra Gordon
    • Rita…
    Tom Savini
    Tom Savini
    • Nicky
    Charles Hoyes
    Charles Hoyes
    • Lobo
    • (as Chuck Hoyes)
    Blay Bahnsen
    • Scratch
    • (as Blay Bahnson)
    Joe Wittkofski
    • TV Director
    John Sutton
    John Sutton
    • TV Sound Man
    Dave Balko
    • TV Video Man
    • (as Dave Belko)
    Jackie Lahane
    • Murdered Girl
    • (as Jackie Lehane)
    Cindy Sebastian
    • Dancer
    Bobbi Van Eman
    • Campfire Extra
    Duke Snyder
    • Campfire Extra
    Kim Snyder
    • Campfire Extra
    Doug Harrison
    • Bar Extra
    Dave Andrews
    • Bar Extra
    • Réalisation
      • Dusty Nelson
    • Scénario
      • William H. Mooney
      • Dusty Nelson
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs25

    5,31.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    7HumanoidOfFlesh

    Mildly effective snuff horror thriller.

    A low-budget horror film is being shot in a secluded mountain area by a hard-working crew and a cast of bewildered actors.However it soon becomes apparent that another crew is shooting the making of the horror film and their intentions are evil.They intend to make the ultimate horror film with real victims,real blood and real death-a genuine snuff movie."Effects" is pretty hard movie to recommend.There are plenty of dull moments where nothing interesting happens.The acting is fairly decent and there are some memorable moments including the director showing 8mm snuff film to his crew,the hunt for Dominic in the woods and startling final twist.It's a shame that the pace of the film is so sluggish.Worth a look for fans of snuff phenomenon.
    6I_Ailurophile

    Clever & twisted at its best, though rather rough around the edges

    Not that there's a specific shortage, but it's surprising sometimes that there aren't more thrillers and horror flicks that toy with film production; the possibilities are endless when the line blurs between fiction and reality. It's also surprising, perhaps, that such a low-budget and independent production should pursue such a tack, but then again, everyone involved in creating this already had considerable experience in the industry. Set these facets aside, and what's striking is that while we do get some keen horror-thriller flavors early on, there is no meaningful plot development until we hit the halfway mark. We're more than three-quarters through before the turn comes, and at that, comes from out of nowhere. Ultimately the premise is fulfilled and we get what we came for - in a manner that's unexpectedly shrewd and even more sinister than anticipated, especially as the story had seemed at first to be a little more plainspoken. I dare say the strength of the last stretch, and the revelations that it bears concerning all the preceding length, definitely help to elevate the whole and pick up the slack. I'd also be lying if I said this weren't very rough around the edges, and 'Effects' surely won't meet with significant favor from many viewers.

    I don't know precisely what the history of the picture is, though I rather assume that given the overall heady, meta, if lo-fi approach to the conglomeration, larger production companies wouldn't have touched this anyway as being too unorthodox, and too risky a venture. That's unfortunate, because all told Dusty Nelson whipped up a(n adapted) story and scenario that's deliciously twisted, and if this had been produced in subsequent years I've no doubt it would have found greater financial support. This falls into that category of horror that's not scary, or even "fun scary," but which instead inspires giddy delight as the underhanded deviousness is unveiled. The foundation is very strong, and this boasts a lot of value in other regards, including excellent stunts and effects. To that point, the enthusiasm that everyone obviously had for the project is quite matched by the skill they contributed. The cast is terrific, all fully embracing their varied roles; Carl Augenstein and Toni Semple's cinematography is unrefined (likely just a reflection of the budgetary limits), but very capable and well done. Nelson's direction can probably be described in those same terms, for that matter, and Pasquale Buba's editing is very sharp. Broadly speaking this is well done.

    Well done - but unpolished. It's very noteworthy that the writing effectively shoves all its plot and horror thrills to the last quarter. There's nothing wrong with this; plenty of other titles do the same, and in this case especially I don't know how the material could have been approached in any other fashion and still landed the same way. What's troubling, however, is how brusque and abrupt the shift is, for the incidents of violence in the last portion come so suddenly that if one were shaping 'Effects' as a parody then there might not be any need to drastically change anything. Prior to that, the dialogue is sometimes less than convincing if not just plain bad (note the passing and absolutely unnecessary tinge of homophobia), and the scene writing is variable. For all the good ideas that there are on hand, in the first half especially there's also a fair amount of frivolous nothing that makes one wonder when something is going to happen - an emptiness that only exacerbates the suddenness with which the plot kicks up at long length. I think the feature needed more discrete substance outside the major story beats, something to uplift the front end especially: more emphasis, perhaps, on the dynamics between the characters; subtle bread crumbs pointing toward the turn; more use of the multilayered framing to give us red herrings.

    Again, this is all made better by the revelations to come in the last stretch, and overall the result is solidly entertaining. It's just that the last stretch shouldn't have had to do this much heavy lifting, and with a few tweaks, it wouldn't have. Of course, it's also possible that I'm just being overly critical, and nitpicking. All I can say is that I very much enjoyed this when all is said and done, with the caveat that I had a hard time even keeping my eyes open for a sizable portion of the runtime. Unless you're a diehard fan of someone involved, Pittsburgh-area film production, or maybe horror-thrillers that play in similar spaces, I don't think this is anything one needs to go out of their way to see, and I must repeat that the rough spots are an issue. Still, when you get down to it 'Effects' is clever, and a pretty good time, and it's worth checking out if you have the chance.
    Michael_Elliott

    Interesting Story But Lackluster Results

    Effects (1980)

    * (out of 4)

    The film takes place in Pittsburg as a crew of low-budget filmmakers are making a horror film. Before long some members start to think that it's not a fake movie but instead a snuff movie.

    EFFECTS is a rather interesting film. It was shot by people in Pittsburg who were in one shape or another connected to George A. Romero. This film appears to have been in production around the same time as DAWN OF THE DEAD but it would never get an official release. It played a few showings back when it was completed and then basically disappeared. Seeing that Tom Savini and Joseph Pilato (DAY OF THE DEAD) were in the cast, it kept fans guessing at the movie and then it would eventually get an official release thanks to Synapse.

    For the most part I really didn't like this movie. I will say that the story itself was quite interesting and especially how the film bounced back and forth as to if what you were watching was real or fake. The "movie within a movie" was an interesting take on the subject and there's no question that the story is years ahead of its time and especially when you consider where reality TV is today. I think the filmmakers deserves a lot of credit for the interesting story and that they didn't just try to go for gory violence.

    With that said, perhaps some gory violence would have helped matters because in the end the film just didn't work for me and I honestly thought the 84-minute running time dragged quite badly. For starters, the film just had a very hard time getting me interested in anything going on. The first forty-five minutes or so are basically us just watching this film crew shoot a movie. After a while we finally get to a snuff movie being shown and this sequence was actually very well done. It was creatively shot and there's no question that it's the highlight of the picture.

    The finale also works well enough and leads to an ending that you really wouldn't expect. The cast and crew are full of Pittsburg natives and it's certainly fun see Savini and Pilato here. The film has a couple gore effects but one shouldn't see Savini's name and think you're getting something like DAWN OF THE DEAD or MANIAC. I really think this is one film that could benefit from a remake and especially in this day and age.
    TokyoGyaru

    Tom Savini isn't enough to save this nothing "film."

    The director just filmed scenes. They obviously forgot to write a script. It's just a bunch a long, boring scenes of people hanging out, doing drugs, and arguing in very few locations. What even was the point? I could only make it 30 minutes because my time is valuable. Too bad, cause the premise (at least what the description promised) was interesting. The movie couldn't have been less interested in it, however.
    8ericdetrick2002

    May go over some people's head- may be too intelligent for some fans

    I knew nothing about the film "Effects" going into it. I'm glad I avoided reading any reviews or summaries because in the end I walked away from it feeling like I had not watched just another 70s exploitation or slasher flick- and those are most of my collection by the way.

    I have a feeling that there will be a large number of Tom Savini gore fans who will go into it expecting a slice 'em up blood fest in the tradition of Maniac or Dawn of the Dead. Instead, what you get is a film that resembles more of a drama about a group of people making a low budget horror film. It isn't really until the 3rd or 4th quarter of the film where the true horror begins; and it throws the story into a spin. This is why i'm glad I didn't research this film and spoil it. I was really impressed with the way these actor performed. This film could have easily given any "high brow" dramas a run for there money. For you Day of the Dead fans, Joe Pilato doesn't play an "out of his mind" military man in this one. Instead he plays one of the main characters, and his performance is on the mark. He is a likable guy in "Effects". That is one of the strengths of this film; there is a decent amount of character development. What may confuse people is that a few of the characters in this movie are also actors in the horror movie they are shooting. So you get sort of a duel role from the same people. So for all you pot smokers or slow people out there, this may mess with you- LOL.

    All and all this is a much better film then a lot of horror fans may give it. And if it rubbed you the wrong way the first time, give it another try. If you want to watch a zombie-slasher movie with lots of blood and guts, then pick up any of the classic zombie flicks- hey Cannibal Holocaust just got re-released on DVD!

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Special Effects
    5,4
    Special Effects
    Le tueur de Malibu
    5,2
    Le tueur de Malibu
    Les jeux de la mort
    4,7
    Les jeux de la mort
    Savage Weekend
    4,5
    Savage Weekend
    La tanière de la bête
    7,0
    La tanière de la bête
    Elle s'appelait Scorpion
    7,1
    Elle s'appelait Scorpion
    Teddy: La mort en peluche
    5,7
    Teddy: La mort en peluche
    Le Sens du devoir II
    6,7
    Le Sens du devoir II
    La secte
    6,0
    La secte
    Moh soen gip
    5,5
    Moh soen gip
    Les frénétiques
    5,6
    Les frénétiques
    Horror Star
    4,7
    Horror Star

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Due to a distributor problem, the film never received a theatrical release or home video release. It never aired on television either. The October 2005 Synapse Films DVD release is the film's first official release anywhere in the world. Although AGFA (American Genre Film Archive) is releasing a Blu-Ray of the film mastered from a rare 35mm print that was made before the distributor backed out.
    • Citations

      Lacey Bickle: Would you like to have sex?

      Rita: You mean with you or just in general?

    • Connexions
      Featured in After Effects: Memories of Pittsburgh Filmmaking (2005)
    • Bandes originales
      RADIO JINGLES
      Written by John Harrison

      Performed by Ron 'Byrd' Foster

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ15

    • How long is Effects?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • juin 1980 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Death's Director
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Ligonier, Pennsylvanie, États-Unis(Pittsburgh Film History by John Tiech)
    • Société de production
      • Image Works
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 55 000 $US (estimé)
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 24 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Mono
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Effects (1979)
    Lacune principale
    By what name was Effects (1979) officially released in Canada in English?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.