Les Sorciers de la guerre

This cartoon was one of those in the seventies when animation was almost dead. A few folks revived it with movies like Fritz the Cat, Lord of the Rings, Fire and Ice and Wizards. Although Wizards didn't do well during the prime time, it rocked as a midnight movie.

But, even with the simple plot, engaging characters and sporadic humor, one gets the impression that this movie was not well-planned. There is conventional animation, rotoscoping and overexposed film sometimes being used on the same screen. It also seems that they ran out of money and had to resort to stills with a narrator (nice voice)...

You'd think that this would make the movie worse; however, it gives the movie a charm that a slicker production wouldn't have...

It's funny reading some of the comments on here, today, in the year 2004. Several people got it right, but to the several that got it wrong -- let us go back in time.

Bakshi's "Wizards" is not meant to be a cinematic masterpiece, but it reflected the time of my generation: The children born under the tip of a planet-killing nuclear bomb. Where, as one post commented, we went to school and learned Duck-And-Cover, and air raid sirens were tested once-a-week, every week of the year. We grew up in a world where the idea of surviving to the year 2004 was shaky, at best. And, as bizarre and B-movie bad as Wizards may be, it spoke to that segment of society that realistically expected the world to end, and another to take its place. Wizards has a place in my heart because my third birthday was around the Cuban Missle Crises, and I grew up with the story of how my parents weren't sure if it was worth planning a birthday party that may never happen. Sure, the bombs are still around today. But the ever-present, daily angst of them falling from the sky doesn't exist like it did in the '60s and '70s and '80s.

One more thing: Give Bakshi his due! Sure, he had his fair share of lemons, but if it wasn't for "Fritz The Cat," and "Wizards" and his other attempts -- there'd likely be no "The Simpsons," "South Park," "Ren and Stimpy," "Family Guy," Cartoon Network's Adult Swim and more -- as we know them today. There may have been Warner Brothers' Bugs Bunny, and Rocky and Bullwinkle, but they were still basically defined as children's entertainment(thus, always shown on Saturday morning). Bakshi defined the niche of adult animation with his efforts to get cartoons to grow up. And, if I'm not mistaken, his success (however you want to measure it) helped spawn "Wait 'Til Your Father Gets Home" -- the first adult animated TV show aired at night.

When one imagines wizards, usually knights, mounts, damsels, and dragons come to mind almost exclusively. But would one think of the haunting memories of the holocaust, or any actions Hitler's Nazi Regime took whenever magic-wielding wizards are mentioned? Not likely.

Bakshi's able to pit the essence of fantasy against the monstrosity of an ever-growing being we call "technology." The animation is simple (albeit complex and interesting at times) yet unique, the characters are conflicted and well-developed, and the twisted, somewhat random humor adds a twist of reality in a seemingly hopeless world. Definitely a movie to watch and a movie to criticize in its own rite.

I have come across who like this movie and some that don't so much, sometimes downright hate it even. As for me, I don't love or dislike Wizards. It is certainly an interesting movie, and is certainly better than Cool World, but as far as Bakshi's movies go I do much prefer Heavy Traffic and American Pop. Wizards' flaws have been covered a number of times in previous reviews, but I do share my agreement with some that have been brought up. The dialogue I don't think has been a general strength in Bakshi's movies but I did find it very corny here. The soundtrack also felt a little cheesy and perhaps too 70s, and the pacing is awkward, often feeling sluggish. I had mixed feelings on the story, it was a great idea and while simple was generally interesting and engaged me once I got over its strangeness. But I did have issues with the narration; not since Don Bluth's Rock a Doodle have I seen an animated movie with such an (I feel) unnecessary overuse of narration. However, the film does look wonderful, the characters do look too cartoony but I liked their rough-around-the-edges charm and the backgrounds and colours are stylish and beautiful. The characters while on the stereotypical side are at least likable and engaging, I did find myself rooting for Avatar. The voice acting is solid on the whole. Overall, decent film and underrated but too flawed for me to consider it a masterpiece. 6/10 Bethany Cox

This film was Bakshi's test-run, of sorts, for his upcoming version of 'Lord of the Rings'. Supposedly he originally wanted to make a fantasy based on the Holocaust, but settled for a more traditional fantasy. The story deals with wizards and elves in the distant future who dig up long-forgotten Nazi propaganda films and old war machinery, which are used by evil creatures to try and conquer the good creatures. The demons and evil creatures are obviously symbols of Nazis while the elves (with one being the voice of a young Mark Hamill) representing the Jews. It's almost disturbing at times watching old WWII war movie footage with German soldiers fighting alongside animated demons against psychedelic-colored backgrounds. The film is worth viewing for the still-drawings alone that appear throughout the film, with excellent artwork by Michael Ploog. The animation doesn't strive for realism (why bother, since Rotoscoping is so heavily used) but captures the dynamic motion depicted in comic book art. Very good. Highly recommended.