Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe year is 1928 and Emily, aged seventeen, returns home from school in Switzerland. At her family estate in the English countryside, it seems everyone is trying to seduce her.The year is 1928 and Emily, aged seventeen, returns home from school in Switzerland. At her family estate in the English countryside, it seems everyone is trying to seduce her.The year is 1928 and Emily, aged seventeen, returns home from school in Switzerland. At her family estate in the English countryside, it seems everyone is trying to seduce her.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
If watching this for a great storyline, acting, writing, or character development, your definitely not watching for the right reasons. It's an el cheapo sex film, nothing more, nothing less. Of course, it's famous for the shower scene with Koo Stark and Ina Skiver. Much has been said by posters here about Koo Stark, but what about Ina Skivner. She had a fine, smooth figure, free of the the tattoos and hardware that seen in the "After Hours" stuff on Showtime and it's On Demand feature in digital cable. Remember, this movie was made just as the exercise boom was getting off the ground. Also, I liked the way Agustine smiled when Emily called for the massage. You get the impression that maybe she asked Emily to pose in a manner that a crick in the neck would occur.
I saw the movie when i was a teen ager and found it interesting only because Koo Stark, who at that time was in close contention with the Royal family, was exposed in it. I recently watched it again and was more disappointed. The movie is horribly directed and acted all through.It contains unbelievable scene sequence and the story is so unrealistic that it starts to bore after fifteen minutes. I wonder whether there is any connection of the plot with the writing of the legend Marquis de Sade. Everyone in the movie seem to be obsessed with one and only one feeling, and that is sex. The major sex scene at the end of the movie is also unerotic and boring. Don't watch this movie even if u r a fan of Koo Stark.
An attempt at some semblance of soft-core porn that is neither enticing, nor the least bit interesting. It's the kind of movie a 12 year old watches at three a.m. only to see a pair of breasts, then to be disappointed when they don't see enough of them and the result is about 10 minutes of nudity and about 1 hour and 15 minutes of useless dialogue.
10Baby-33
Excellent movie. I especially enjoyed the shower scene. I highly recommend this movie.
The soundtrack was excellent. The characters were a little shallow, but it still was a great movie.
The soundtrack was excellent. The characters were a little shallow, but it still was a great movie.
A British attempt at the erotic styling of Emmanuelle which shows why we were better at sex comedy than soft focus.
Koo Stark is beautiful but bland in the lead bit then again the script doesn't give any of the cast much to work with.
Give me a Confessions film any time
Koo Stark is beautiful but bland in the lead bit then again the script doesn't give any of the cast much to work with.
Give me a Confessions film any time
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesHad a minor revival of interest, after its star, Koo Stark became involved with Prince Andrew in 1981. Many of the tabloid papers at the time referred to her involvement in this film, especially the sex scenes and the nudity. Because of this, the relationship was effectively stymied, and the prince went on to marry Sarah Ferguson in 1985.
- ConnexionsReferenced in The Crown: Favourites (2020)
- Bandes originalesSweet Emily
Written & Sung by Rod McKuen
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Emily?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant