Slavers

After watching a fuzzy copy of this film on the Fast32 streaming service, I gave "Slavers" just five points (still above the average rating). I'm wondering why, with it having so many plus ingredients: a strong cast (albeit some past their prime), excellent scenery, a reasonable plot, a good firefight - and I don't object to female nudity (with Britt Ekland briefly going topless, somewhat gratuitously, whereas the native women's near-nakedness was at least authentic).

Maybe it was the subject matter: the distasteful exploitation of Africans by Europeans, Arabs and their own countrymen. Since the film was made, there's been increasing concern about many countries' "colonial past" and perhaps it's today's zeitgeist that made me feel uncomfortable about that of the 1880s.

Period set tale of the slave trade in Africa and how the nominal hero, Ron Ely goes from supporting it to instead helping to end it. Good melodramatic story is full of all of the exploitation hallmarks you'd expect- nudity, violence, general bad behavior-, but done less garishly and over the top in films like Mandingo and The Drum or any of the other films from the 70's that exploited the slave trade in the name of teaching us all a lesson. There aren't many of these films and for the most part they are a poor lot with most of the films so bad that they are funny. This one however is better then the rest even if it does get a bit melodramatic. The best thing I can say is its a watchable potboiler.

The title here gives it all away: this is a depiction of the human slave trade in east Africa around the time it was becoming abolished (according to the narration), circa 1884. This picture followed in the wake of the phenomenal "Roots" TV mini-series of '77, along with other international productions of the period, such as "Ashanti." It's not very well known by this time and barely seen anywhere, an example of exploiting the slavery angle prevalent during the seventies, but seemingly based on historical fact. The movie utilizes well-known actors who have been around for a long time (Trevor Howard, Ray Milland) and TV's Tarzan (Ron Ely) as the nominal hero, who starts out as a typical bigot of that era but progresses to sympathetic status near the conclusion. Most of the plot has to do with competing slavers fighting over the dwindling slave trade; this trade is technically outlawed by this point, but continues under those unwilling to give it up (it's highly profitable, after all). There's a central set piece of a slaver's home base invaded by servants of a competitor, for example, resulting in some bloody violence.

The movie contains scenes of stark, callous brutality, emphasizing that most aristocrats during that time considered dark-skinned people as lower than human. A particularly shocking scene is overseen by the most powerful slaver (Milland), who casually shoots slaves in a pond as entertainment for his upper class guests, who clap appreciatively at his marksmanship. This drives home the point that in the 19th century the mindset was quite different. Yet, Ely's character is temporarily placed in bondage as well, despite obviously being a blond Nordic type; perhaps at this time, slavers were less discriminating due to the reduction of opportunity in this area. The incident serves to awaken the tall blonde fellow's humanity. Howard hams it up as another competing slaver (and Ely's uncle), who appears to be less of a monster than most, but the picture eventually reveals that all involved in such evil enterprise are by necessity inhuman sadists when all's said and done, and there are no happy endings. I viewed a shorter 90-minute version and the ending & epilogue are quite abrupt, with some concluding narration explaining how a few of the characters ended up, rather than actually showing scenes of their finales.