NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
453
MA NOTE
À la fin des années 1800, un capitaine de l'armée essaie d'apprivoiser les plaines de l'Argentine dominées par les autochtones et les bandits. Il fait alors appel à un groupe de prostituées ... Tout lireÀ la fin des années 1800, un capitaine de l'armée essaie d'apprivoiser les plaines de l'Argentine dominées par les autochtones et les bandits. Il fait alors appel à un groupe de prostituées pour ses soldats.À la fin des années 1800, un capitaine de l'armée essaie d'apprivoiser les plaines de l'Argentine dominées par les autochtones et les bandits. Il fait alors appel à un groupe de prostituées pour ses soldats.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Felicia Roc
- Camila Ometio
- (as Fela Roque)
Charles Fawcett
- Pvt. El Gato
- (as Carlos Fawcett)
Jorge Rigaud
- Old Man
- (as George Rigaud)
José María Caffarel
- Vigo
- (as Jose Maria Cafarell)
Avis à la une
Tittilating and exciting describe this movie, which has a opiate effect of luring the viewer in and addicting the viewer. Its a South of the border Western with Robert Taylor portraying an anti hero in charge of a group soldiers who are drafted from the prisons and gallows. He has his hands full just trying to keep them all from deserting. Ty Hardin plays an anarchist who slowly wins over Taylor's confidence and possibly respect. They are among a handful of men who transport beautiful women to the fort to help keep the number of deserters down. Meanwhile, former deserters unite with local natives and try to steal the women. Taylor plays the sort of anti hero who is much more believable and identifiable than the clownish ones of later spaghetti Westerns. Taylor, like Eastwood, wasn't as gifted an actor as his fellow cast members in most cases, so his stoic look serves as that of observer-cynic. However, the writing of "Savage Pampas" is far superior to that of the spaghetti Westerns. The characters are well defined and written well enough that you don't need an Eli Wallach or Lee Van Cleef to pull them off. Still, Hardin was never a slouch in the acting department. His anti hero has more heart than Taylor's, but Taylor's character is still convincing. Like true anti heroes, they're not superhuman murderous machines, but much more in line with the old West. The ending is totally unpredictable, and as far as I know, an unusual fate for Robert Taylor, and Ty Hardin. The music has a fascination to it, and it helps lure you in. One of the great Westerns.
The curiosity here is that it is a western, which takes place in Argentina, in the pampas. There are soldiers, here led by Robert Taylor, Indians, deserters, and a highwayman type villain, who looks a bit like a spaghetti western (the film is from 1965).
The film is in CinemaScope format and spends much of its time filming characters who cut across the horizon with the sky, the ridge line, which makes for great cutaways, as they spend their time moving around: the subject matter concerns the escorting of a convoy of prostitutes to a garrison lost in the pampas to reduce the rate of desertion, as they haven't seen a woman in several years. Of course, this convoy is coveted by everyone.
Robert Taylor plays the chief officer who is constantly beaten, kicked, dragged in the dust, but also experienced and having no more illusions. And the character of the anarchist, who is finally the most interesting, invites a little humor and irony.
All in all, the film lasts, thanks to its visual qualities.
The film is in CinemaScope format and spends much of its time filming characters who cut across the horizon with the sky, the ridge line, which makes for great cutaways, as they spend their time moving around: the subject matter concerns the escorting of a convoy of prostitutes to a garrison lost in the pampas to reduce the rate of desertion, as they haven't seen a woman in several years. Of course, this convoy is coveted by everyone.
Robert Taylor plays the chief officer who is constantly beaten, kicked, dragged in the dust, but also experienced and having no more illusions. And the character of the anarchist, who is finally the most interesting, invites a little humor and irony.
All in all, the film lasts, thanks to its visual qualities.
A sad and dismal almost final ending for Robert Taylor. His handsome looks faded by time, drink, and possible lung cancer, Robert Taylor presents a depressing lifeless figure in this 3rd rate South American produced Western. As a big fan of Taylor, I really don't want to remember him in this film. Of course, this is easy to do, as this movie has virtually been lost to time. It's clear that Robert Taylor didn't have his heart in the role of "Captain Martin". He looks weather beaten, tired, and just plain worn out. His build is just too thin and he appears in ill health. Even the feel of this whole movie is that of people "Beaten-Up" by the passing of time and hard living. Savage Pampas is "savage" to watch. There is little to like and it's not even a pleasant night at the movies. Savage Pampas is just a dismal footnote in the faltering career of Robert Taylor.
This was one of Robert Taylor's final films. It should be seen not so much for his stiff performance (that was his style) as the Argentine Army Captain who's posted in the pampas during the last century, but for the realistic setting and story line this movie displays. It's not a great film but it does have some merits. Probably the only other face that will be recognized is that of Ty Hardin from the 50's TV show. There's a video now but you can likely still catch this one the late show too. But, it's worth watching. Taylor made a couple of other films before dying in 1969 but they're really not worth mentioning. But, check this one out for some quite accurate portrayals of gauchos on the wild pampas.
Western fans may or may not find enjoyment in this dusty, violent mini-epic. Fans of Spaghetti Westerns will likely enjoy it more. The film, which primarily involves the transportation of hookers across Argentinian terrain beset by Indians and rebellious deserters, has a lot going for it and a lot against it. Taylor, in one of his last roles, plays an Army Captain whose chief duty is to defend a fort and keep his men from running off and joining the opposing forces led by renegade Randell. Taylor, an actor who methodically and deliberately did everything he could to ruin his pretty-boy looks, appears wax-like and worn in most of his scenes. His growly voice comes across pretty effectively, but he is almost unbearably stoic through most of the film. However, he is put through some grueling physical torment (when his stunt double isn't doing it) that's somewhat remarkable for someone his age. He also gets off a few decent sarcastic lines, but is hard-pressed to overcome his Abraham Sofaer look and costuming. (At times his hat cord blends in with his goatee making him look like he has a long braided beard! He also has a series of unflattering head scarves which are probably authentic, but don't lend themselves to cinematic authority. Most of the cast wear diaper-like rugs between their legs....another authentic aspect which cuts down on the expectations one may have for a western style film. Some will see this as appealingly different, others may scoff at it.) Randell gets to ham it up a bit in the style that was made famous by Eli Wallach and other stronger actors (with better written parts.) Hardin (bizarrely dressed like a sexy Abe Lincoln) comes along late in the game as an anarchist who is being remanded to Army duty. He has a couple of interesting moments (and a great final scene!), but is mostly wasted. WHY wasn't he in the river with the hookers when they were bathing?? The hookers are a motley group of international actresses. It's hard to drum up much interest in most of them as their characters are only scratched upon. One thing setting apart the interest level in anyone who isn't a name brand star is the atrocious dubbing of the film. This is why those accustomed to Spaghetti Westerns may give the movie higher marks than other viewers. One male actor has a creepy, whispering sound to all of his lines. The ladies mostly have shrill, loud or gravelly voices assigned to them. Any sort of bit part sounds like it was recorded off the street. What's good about the film is it's unusual setting and it's desert scenery. Also, there are certain story elements which come across as unique or at least not overdone. (The Indians use these nasty little ball & rope weapons which are intriguing to see.) A couple of confrontations and action scenes are memorable, even if on an amusing level. (Look out for that head!) What's bad about the film is the aforementioned dubbing, the disjointed nature of the script which makes it hard at first to understand the story, and the choppy editing, unfocused direction and amateurish acting by some of the supporting players. Western diehards should find something to like, but most mainstream filmgoers will find it rough to get through.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesRon Randell and Laya Raki were married at the time of this film.
- ConnexionsRemake of Pampa barbare (1945)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Savage Pampas?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Savage Pampas
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 52 minutes
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant