Un scientifique américain est envoyé par la CIA en Allemagne de l'Est pour récupérer un microfilm secret auprès d'un scientifique soviétique désireux de passer à l'Ouest, mais la surveillanc... Tout lireUn scientifique américain est envoyé par la CIA en Allemagne de l'Est pour récupérer un microfilm secret auprès d'un scientifique soviétique désireux de passer à l'Ouest, mais la surveillance de la police secrète complique les choses.Un scientifique américain est envoyé par la CIA en Allemagne de l'Est pour récupérer un microfilm secret auprès d'un scientifique soviétique désireux de passer à l'Ouest, mais la surveillance de la police secrète complique les choses.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Counselor Peter Heinzmann
- (as Hardy Kruger)
- Frieda Hoffmann
- (as Macha Meril)
- Agent Adams
- (as Roddy Mc Dowall)
- Spitzel
- (non crédité)
- Fluchthelfer Franz Ritter
- (non crédité)
- Tommy
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
Here Clift plays James Bower, a physicist from the U.S. currently visiting West Germany. He's recruited, or should we say threatened with no more grants for his work, to help the CIA in the defection of a Russian scientist. The scientist will only talk to Bower. In truth, both sides want stolen microfilm, and Bower has an agent on his tail who knows he will receive the microfilm.
This film sort of goes nowhere; there were lots of cold war and spy films during the '60s, some serious, some spoofs, and many are better than this. There's a laziness about it rather than a tension. Clift does a very good job. He's super-thin, and if you have followed him in films, it's easy to see that he is not a well man and that his career is in tatters. He remains handsome, though as he did in so many post-accident films, he slurs his words. He gives a relaxed performance; but the fact is that he was probably out of it.
This film didn't need relaxation, it needed an urgency, and it doesn't have it. Nevertheless, filmed on location, the atmosphere is right, and there is a pervasive darkness.
There are many people who become addicted to painkillers after sustaining horrible injuries. Montgomery Clift was one of them, and the situation was exacerbated by drinking and health problems. He remains an important actor in Hollywood history, a man with a brilliant career that petered out way too soon. The Defector isn't really representative of what he could do, but I'd rather have it than nothing at all.
The film tells a dour, jaundiced cold war espionage tale in a way that was quite fashionable in its day. It does well in capturing the austere mood of a communist bloc country and the location photography is interesting, but the story is very slow and there really isn't much to it until the final couple of reels. The scene which encapsulates the entire film consists of Clift and Hardy Kruger talking at a table and Clift's contribution to the conversation is mostly to repeatedly ask for his passport. The contrast (and conflict) of their respective countries' ideologies could (and has) make for an interesting subtext for a film, but its treatment is too dour here. There are nice touches, and an expectation on the part of the filmmakers of a degree of attention and intelligence on the part of their audience, but it never really succeeds in its objectives.
The film itself is typical '60s Cold War stuff, with a complex plot and lots of cloak and dagger treachery. Clift plays a scientist who is blackmailed into working as a spy behind the Iron Curtain. His cover is dangerously thin from the beginning, but by the end it has been blown wide open and he has to flee for his life. Indeed, the film only really comes to life during that final half hour or so. The build up is mildly intriguing, but not sufficiently so to make this a great film. The location photography helps to give the film a sense of authenticity, if nothing else.
I wouldn't recommend The Defector to anyone other than spy afficianados or fans of Montgomery Clift.
The main asset of the film is actually the delightful music by Serge Gainsbourg, which every time it tunes in gives some relief to a rather bleak and sordid story. It is in character very much like "Funeral in Berlin" of almost the same year but more sophisticated and interesting, while the Harry Palmer case is much more attractive as a film. Much of the flaws of the film are due to very poor direction - the directior has difficulties in bringing his actors to life. You must not be that formal and stiff, callous and expressionless in a film that involves great nervous strain, a love affair, brainwash ordeals and an escape for your life. Although the story is good and of great interest, the director fails to bring it sufficiently alive on screen to make it engaging.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesLast movie of Montgomery Clift.
- GaffesAt the end of the film when Montgomery Clift shouts, "Don't move him!" his lips are clearly forming other words.
- Citations
Counselor Peter Heinzmann: He seems to suffer from a disease I can only call "espionitus".
- Crédits fousMost items in the closing credits appear and/or disappear in time with rhythms in the final music.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Making Montgomery Clift (2018)
Meilleurs choix
- How long is The Defector?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Defector
- Lieux de tournage
- Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Bavière, Allemagne(zoo - with elephant building in the background)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 500 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée1 heure 40 minutes
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1