Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn unusually nasty butler takes over the possessions of his degenerate master by means of witchcraft.An unusually nasty butler takes over the possessions of his degenerate master by means of witchcraft.An unusually nasty butler takes over the possessions of his degenerate master by means of witchcraft.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
That's the question butler Oliver Reed asks of aristocrat Fiona Lewis in Andrew Sinclair's BLUE BLOOD (1973), one of the oddest movies you'll ever encounter. Novelist Sinclair had just come from doing his interesting but quirky adaptation of Dylan Thomas' UNDER MILK WOOD with Richard Burton & Peter O'Toole. This time around Sinclair adapted a bizarre story by an English aristocrat who co-wrote and co-produced the film and even allowed his historic estate to be used as the setting. On the surface BLUE BLOOD resembles Joseph Losey's THE SERVANT where Dirk Bogarde begins to dominate his employer.
This time around its Oliver Reed as the sinister butler and he employs one of the strangest accents ever heard. The story starts with an unflattering portrayal of the British upper class and then progresses from domination by domestics to possible Satanic goings on. BLUE BLOOD is incomprehensible at times and positively revels in its weirdness plus you get to see a lot of the young Derek Jacobi and Fiona Lewis as the aristocratic couple. Too bad there are no subtitles with the DVD as some of the accents and dialogue (primarily Reed's) are very difficult to understand. Worth seeing for the people involved and for the incredible house and grounds...For more reviews visit The Capsule Critic.
This time around its Oliver Reed as the sinister butler and he employs one of the strangest accents ever heard. The story starts with an unflattering portrayal of the British upper class and then progresses from domination by domestics to possible Satanic goings on. BLUE BLOOD is incomprehensible at times and positively revels in its weirdness plus you get to see a lot of the young Derek Jacobi and Fiona Lewis as the aristocratic couple. Too bad there are no subtitles with the DVD as some of the accents and dialogue (primarily Reed's) are very difficult to understand. Worth seeing for the people involved and for the incredible house and grounds...For more reviews visit The Capsule Critic.
A young German nanny takes up employment at a large English stately home, where a sinister butler called Tom (Oliver Reed) appears to have power over the master (Derek Jacobi) and the other staff. It has taken me decades to finally see this, having picked it up on DVD. I recall it being screened on TV years ago, listed as a horror, but for some reason I missed it. Sadly it proved somewhat disappointing. Filmed over two weeks for a mere £55,000 it is a far cry from many of Reed's other movies that he had starred in, and it does show. The story is based on a novel by Lord Alexander Thynn, the 7th Marquis of Bath, and was filmed at his home Longleat in Wiltshire. This was one of the film's stronger points, one part shows scenes of visitors queuing up in their delightful looking old cars, it is almost part documentary and brought back memories of visiting it myself back in the 1970's. The film features much drinking and smoking dope (apparently Reed would organise evening pub crawls for the cast and ended up smashing up his Bentley Continental!), plus Lord Gregory spends a lot of time in bed with his wife (Fiona Lewis) and his mistress, all three are seen naked. Oliver Reed is one of my favourite actors and he looks menacing here but unfortunately just mumbles his way through, "As a gentleman's gentleman I sometimes ask myself who is a real gentleman?". Billed as a horror movie this is 90% rather slow drama, only the Satanic looking segment near the end gives it any horror. The bruises on the young children, or baby bashing as it is referred to in the film, was the most horrifying aspect. Overall I felt slightly disappointed, having waited so long to finally watch it, there were elements that did interest me but Blue Blood is certainly not a film for a wide audience.
BLUE BLOOD (1974) is undoubtedly one of the oddest British horror films I've ever watched, if you can even really call it a horror. It was barely released over here despite starring Oliver Reed, yet somehow Netflix have managed to stream it. The story focuses on the relationship between Reed, playing a butler, and his decadent master, played by Derek Jacobi, no less. The film was notably shot at the Longleat estate, co-written by the Marquess of Bath, and even has some scenes at the famous zoo.
After watching I have no idea what it was really about. There are red-tinted visions, dream sequences and an annoying twist ending. As the title would suggest, it seems to be a satire about class ties but doesn't really go into detail. There's one good horror scene but far more sex and eroticism. At times it feels like a Ken Russell or Michael Winner odyssey of excess and bad behaviour. Reed has a dodgy accent and Jacobi is typically committed to his role. Fiona Lewis co-stars alongsside the Marquess's real-life wife (well, one of them, anyway). Not one I'd want to sit through again!
After watching I have no idea what it was really about. There are red-tinted visions, dream sequences and an annoying twist ending. As the title would suggest, it seems to be a satire about class ties but doesn't really go into detail. There's one good horror scene but far more sex and eroticism. At times it feels like a Ken Russell or Michael Winner odyssey of excess and bad behaviour. Reed has a dodgy accent and Jacobi is typically committed to his role. Fiona Lewis co-stars alongsside the Marquess's real-life wife (well, one of them, anyway). Not one I'd want to sit through again!
Two questions remain unanswered after finishing "Blue Blood". What the hell is it? And why was it ever made? Now, I don't know what other people seek in movies, but to me those answers are crucial. Initially, I was quite excited - and mildly surprised - to find this title on Netflix. A psychedelic British horror/cult movie from 1974 and starring one of my all-time favorite actors (Oliver Reed) is an unusual find in their streaming offer, to say the least. "Blue Blood" turns out a massive disappointment, because the storyline is thin & senseless, the whole thing is boring beyond words, and Reed does not only act bizarre, but he also talks bizarrely.
The story - or lack thereof - entirely takes place in a massive mansion on a large country estate that is also a sort of zoo/safari park. The owner is a Lord (Derek Jacobi) who's only interested in having sons to continue the family legacy, and the most powerful person in the house is the head servant Tom (Oliver Reed). Tom uses drugs and black magic to manipulate everyone on the estate, also including the Lord's wife and mistress, and the newly arrived well-mannered German nanny.
Sounds interesting, and I'm convinced it could have been with a more gifted director and a slightly more elaborated script, but it's just slow, uneventful, dull, and irritating. Oliver Reed is the type of actor who gave stellar performances when he himself believed the film was great ("The Devils", "Revolver"), but when he didn't like it - like clearly the case here - he is arrogant and passive.
Now that I have reviewed approximately 5,500 horror & cult movies, I must admit I've had a few minor panic attacks about "running out". Not running out of titles to watch, because there are literally thousands of horror titles out there and new ones are being released on an almost daily basis. No, I'm worried about running out of GOOD movies from my favorite decades: the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Lately, when discovering obscure titles from these eras, they all turn out to be major disappointments. Like "Blue Blood", in fact.
The story - or lack thereof - entirely takes place in a massive mansion on a large country estate that is also a sort of zoo/safari park. The owner is a Lord (Derek Jacobi) who's only interested in having sons to continue the family legacy, and the most powerful person in the house is the head servant Tom (Oliver Reed). Tom uses drugs and black magic to manipulate everyone on the estate, also including the Lord's wife and mistress, and the newly arrived well-mannered German nanny.
Sounds interesting, and I'm convinced it could have been with a more gifted director and a slightly more elaborated script, but it's just slow, uneventful, dull, and irritating. Oliver Reed is the type of actor who gave stellar performances when he himself believed the film was great ("The Devils", "Revolver"), but when he didn't like it - like clearly the case here - he is arrogant and passive.
Now that I have reviewed approximately 5,500 horror & cult movies, I must admit I've had a few minor panic attacks about "running out". Not running out of titles to watch, because there are literally thousands of horror titles out there and new ones are being released on an almost daily basis. No, I'm worried about running out of GOOD movies from my favorite decades: the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Lately, when discovering obscure titles from these eras, they all turn out to be major disappointments. Like "Blue Blood", in fact.
An outstanding acting by the good old and never enough recognized Derek Jacobi and of course, Ollie Reed that here makes the perfect butler, stiff, stone-faced, confident and knowledgeable. I would've welcomed subtitles when he spoke Geordie dialect though. The setting is sublime and the environs perfect for a bunch of lunatics trying to fit in the social expectations of the time. We even get a most wonderful song to a nanny! If you are a nanny you will be proud of this beautiful rendering. As always British use in their films sophisticated cars that I very much enjoy seeing. All in all another masterpiece of British film making even if the Director only started (and ended) his career with this film.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFor its Italian release, this movie was promoted as a sequel to Ken Russell's The Devils (1971).
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Blueblood?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 26 minutes
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was BlueBlood (1974) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre