Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA black, Union Army deserter and his crippled American Indian hostage form a strained partnership in the interests of surviving the advancing threats of a racist bounty hunter and neighborin... Tout lireA black, Union Army deserter and his crippled American Indian hostage form a strained partnership in the interests of surviving the advancing threats of a racist bounty hunter and neighboring bandits.A black, Union Army deserter and his crippled American Indian hostage form a strained partnership in the interests of surviving the advancing threats of a racist bounty hunter and neighboring bandits.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Avis à la une
The production values of this film are spectacularly poor. Especially at the beginning. In spite of that it's a fairly gripping drama that leaves the viewer with plenty of food for thought. Well worth watching. Don't let the first 10 minutes put you off.
The title is the name of a chicken encountered by army deserter Richard Roundtree and American Indian Roy Thinnes in this eccentric reprise of 'The Defiant Ones'.
Establishing right from the outset a suitably raw mood with a scene depicting two dogs snarling and bearing their teeth prior to the main bout between Roundtree & Thinnes shot in hot Spanish sunlight by Kenneth Talbot, and with a minimalist soundtrack of insects buzzing and the wind rustling with a score employing a civil war tin whistle, a blues piano and a harmonica.
While Nigel Davenport provides ripe villainy as a ruthless bounty hunter in a top hat with a taste for the lash.
Establishing right from the outset a suitably raw mood with a scene depicting two dogs snarling and bearing their teeth prior to the main bout between Roundtree & Thinnes shot in hot Spanish sunlight by Kenneth Talbot, and with a minimalist soundtrack of insects buzzing and the wind rustling with a score employing a civil war tin whistle, a blues piano and a harmonica.
While Nigel Davenport provides ripe villainy as a ruthless bounty hunter in a top hat with a taste for the lash.
This film begins during the Civil War with an unnamed "Black Soldier" (played by Richard Roundtree) being caught in bed with his commanding officer's wife. Needless to say, this infuriates the white officer who immediately goes for his pistol but is shot and killed for his efforts. Realizing that he will surely hang for this, the black soldier immediately deserts and runs as fast as he can for the Mexican border. The scene then shifts to an "Indian" (played by Roy Thinnes) sitting alone in the Mexican desert when he is suddenly attacked by the black soldier and taken prisoner. It is then revealed that, because the Indian is partially crippled and of mixed blood, he has been kicked out of his tribe and forced to make it on his own. So, despite the black soldier's cruel treatment of him, the Indian takes things in stride without complaining. Be that as it may, they eventually come upon an abandoned mission and--because it offers shelter from the sun and has source of water--decide to stay there for a while. But what neither of them realize is that there is a bounty on the black soldier's head, and this will soon create all kinds of problems for all concerned. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this was an interesting film which exposed some ugly truths about racism and the miserable conditions it creates for those affected by it. Unfortunately, the film seemed to focus too much on the ill-treatment of the Indian and this got rather dull and tedious after a while. That being said, while not necessarily a bad film by any means, I didn't particularly care for it all that much and I have rated it accordingly.
Prime candidate for a remake!
It's frustrating that so many movies are remade that were already great films in the first place.
As others have said, the acting in this movie ranges from poor to over the top and the pacing of the movie isn't ideal.
The two main characters could also be put in more jeopardy than we see here
The basic premise of the story is very good though and it could become great as a remake.
Would love to see this happen.
I can't remember another movie where I have rated it 7 out of 10 when the acting has been this much below par.
Glad I stumbled across this. At the time of writing, it is available on Amazon Prime.
It's frustrating that so many movies are remade that were already great films in the first place.
As others have said, the acting in this movie ranges from poor to over the top and the pacing of the movie isn't ideal.
The two main characters could also be put in more jeopardy than we see here
The basic premise of the story is very good though and it could become great as a remake.
Would love to see this happen.
I can't remember another movie where I have rated it 7 out of 10 when the acting has been this much below par.
Glad I stumbled across this. At the time of writing, it is available on Amazon Prime.
I've been looking for this film for years so last night I recorded it from the UK Retro Channel and when I watched it back it had been edited down to 45 minutes!
I don't remember Nigel Davenport appearing.
Hilarious but disappointing!
I don't remember Nigel Davenport appearing.
Hilarious but disappointing!
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsReferenced in Massage Parlor Murders! (1973)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant