NOTE IMDb
5,0/10
558
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueTeddy, working at an advertising agency, has to come up with a campaign for frozen porridge.Teddy, working at an advertising agency, has to come up with a campaign for frozen porridge.Teddy, working at an advertising agency, has to come up with a campaign for frozen porridge.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Frances de la Tour
- Maud Crape
- (as Frances De la Tour)
Avis à la une
British sex-comedy that has some very nicely animated sequences in it and is funnier than the average comedy made in the UK of this genre. The 7 dwarfs and the "toothpastetube-car" are really a must-see! I think the scene with the amazing car is the best!
I remember seeing this for the first time when I was about 7. Children In Need was on BBC 1 (or maybe Comic Relief) and I was allowed to sleep downstairs to watch the whole event. Anyway, I found this on the other channel at about 2.30am, and I was totally blown away by it. Not least the funky theme tune, the cartoons, those eyes, Julie Ege etc. Anyway, a couple of years later I got it on VHS...surprise surprise, the cut I'd seen on ITV had been trimmed significantly. The bit with the hot dog vendor, the fantasy sequence where Teddy imagines a fight sequence with the vicar had both been cut, with maybe some other bits. I've seen this film more than any other film, and have collected as much stuff to do with it as I can; 4 posters, lobby cards, and approximately 60 black and white stills. If anyone has anything else related to this film, please get in touch. A few things bother me though; how did Shelley Berman get involved?Why is Alan Bennett uncredited? Shelley Berman turned up in Friends a few years back, and his character's name was Kaplan, as in this film. Was Kaplan his own persona, or was this a nod to the film? Does the US cut differ any from the UK?
This is far better a film than I expected. I knew Marty Feldman would be good but I rather expected the usual British sex comedy ingredients of unfunny sequences with men (too old) falling over as they scramble towards very average looking girls (all the while squealing). Big surprise then, for this is an intelligent, inspired and inventive exercise, being very much of its time and all the better for it. The spoof TV adverts at the start threaten to overwhelm but thanks to Richard Williams' inspired animation all turns out very well and the picture is very representative of the time, with swirling graphics and sublimely surreal moments (tube of toothpaste car with dwarfs inside!). Good script with political and social satire and some funny lines. Julie Ege far, far better than one might have imagined and indeed there are more good looking girls in this than in all the rest of similar films of the period put together. There is a slightly over extended sequence towards the end in the TV props department but even here there is inventiveness and overall a very good effort that must surely have been as much fun to make as to watch.
Marty was one of the great talents of his generation.I was a fan particularly of his writing on Round The Horne. However he didn't seem to have great success when it came to films in the UK.There are some funny sequences in this film,but as a whole it is wanting.He didn't try again here for 7 years.Incidentally it is curious that this film has a low rating but 14 out of 20 reviewers have rated this 7 or above.
Very 70's and very English. The Brits love their vicars. And the 70s loved the exploration of sex. Catchy theme song.
There's lots of Monty Python-esque tomfoolery as well. It's a weird films. Especially the sound. It has a dubbed quality to it, almost like it was made in Japan and dubbed in English. Only it's not.
Makes for weird viewing.
Not a lot of nudity despite the cover art and film concept.
The bottom line is this -- I really wanted to like this film. I'm a fan of English humor and Marty Feldman. But in the end, it's not really a good film. It will not deliver any belly laughs.
There's lots of Monty Python-esque tomfoolery as well. It's a weird films. Especially the sound. It has a dubbed quality to it, almost like it was made in Japan and dubbed in English. Only it's not.
Makes for weird viewing.
Not a lot of nudity despite the cover art and film concept.
The bottom line is this -- I really wanted to like this film. I'm a fan of English humor and Marty Feldman. But in the end, it's not really a good film. It will not deliver any belly laughs.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesVeteran actress Patience Collier plays a "Mrs. Levin" in the film, and is outrageously made up to resemble a transvestite version of the eminent journalist and broadcaster Bernard Levin, a friend of producer Ned Sherrin and one of the stars of Sherrin's most famous TV series, "That Was the Week That Was (1962)" (1962).
- Citations
Inga Giltenburg: [Subtitles in Swedish dream sequence] This was your first time? What did you think of it?
Teddy Brown: It's better than open sandwiches.
- Crédits fousDuring the opening credits, all the "by"s are replaced with "buy"s.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Funny Turns: Penelope Keith: Lady of the Manor (2000)
- Bandes originalesEvery Home Should Have One
(uncredited)
Music by John Cameron (uncredited)
Title Lyric BUY Caryl Brahms & Ned Sherrin
Sung BUY Millicent Martin
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Every Home Should Have One?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 34min(94 min)
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant