[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Brûle, sorcière, brûle !

Titre original : Night of the Eagle
  • 1962
  • Not Rated
  • 1h 30min
NOTE IMDb
6,9/10
4,5 k
MA NOTE
Brûle, sorcière, brûle ! (1962)
Horreur surnaturelleDrameHorreur

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA woman who may be a witch defends her husband from forces attempting to harm him.A woman who may be a witch defends her husband from forces attempting to harm him.A woman who may be a witch defends her husband from forces attempting to harm him.

  • Réalisation
    • Sidney Hayers
  • Scénario
    • Fritz Leiber Jr.
    • Charles Beaumont
    • Richard Matheson
  • Casting principal
    • Peter Wyngarde
    • Janet Blair
    • Margaret Johnston
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    6,9/10
    4,5 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Sidney Hayers
    • Scénario
      • Fritz Leiber Jr.
      • Charles Beaumont
      • Richard Matheson
    • Casting principal
      • Peter Wyngarde
      • Janet Blair
      • Margaret Johnston
    • 78avis d'utilisateurs
    • 72avis des critiques
    • 73Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 1 nomination au total

    Photos82

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 77
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux15

    Modifier
    Peter Wyngarde
    Peter Wyngarde
    • Norman Taylor
    Janet Blair
    Janet Blair
    • Tansy Taylor
    Margaret Johnston
    Margaret Johnston
    • Flora Carr
    Anthony Nicholls
    Anthony Nicholls
    • Harvey Sawtelle
    Colin Gordon
    Colin Gordon
    • Lindsay Carr
    Kathleen Byron
    Kathleen Byron
    • Evelyn Sawtelle
    Reginald Beckwith
    Reginald Beckwith
    • Harold Gunnison
    Jessica Dunning
    • Hilda Gunnison
    Norman Bird
    Norman Bird
    • Doctor
    Judith Stott
    • Margaret Abbott
    Bill Mitchell
    • Fred Jennings
    Paul Frees
    Paul Frees
    • Prologue Narrator
    • (U.S. version)
    • (voix)
    • (non crédité)
    George Roubicek
    George Roubicek
    • Cleaner
    • (non crédité)
    Frank Singuineau
    Frank Singuineau
    • Truck Driver
    • (non crédité)
    Gary Woolf
    • Relief Driver
    • (non crédité)
    • Réalisation
      • Sidney Hayers
    • Scénario
      • Fritz Leiber Jr.
      • Charles Beaumont
      • Richard Matheson
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs78

    6,94.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    BaronBl00d

    Baubles, Bangles, & Bright, Shiny Beads

    A small university town in England is the setting of this well-crafted tale of witchcraft, voodoo, and mystery concerning the rise of a young professor in his department in Sociology. The film begins with the professor giving a lecture on the ridiculous nature of the supernatural. He says that the supernatural only exists when believers exist; otherwise without believers, there would be no supernatural. I thought this was a great way to start a film. You know that before long this young professor will be eating those words. And, indeed, he does. The film's basic premise concerns this man's wife, Tansy, helping him rise - or at least believing to help him rise - in his department amidst other forces that wish to see his downfall. There is certainly a lot going for this British, low-budget film. Great performances are delivered by the entire cast, particularly Peter Wyngarde as the man trapped between what he sees as logical and reasonable and what his wife believes is responsible for his success. Janet Blair plays his wife with great conviction and an intensity that makes what she does seem plausible. One other acting notable belongs to Margaret Johnston as a rather scary, limping colleague who has a crushing blow delivered to her when she doesn't get the department chair. She makes one scary woman! The direction is in the hands of the ever-capable Sidney Hayers, responsible for many of my favourite episodes of The Avengers(including "The Superlative Seven"). Hayers is excellent at pacing the film with tension. But the most credit for the film's success must be given to Richard Matheson who adapted the film from the celebrated novel Conjure Wife by Fritz Leiber. Matheson has just enough logic mixed in with mysterious red herrings, superstitious practices, and quaint, British manners to make for a most enjoyable film. There is no doubt that for this film: the eagle has landed!
    9trouserpress

    Another triumph for black and white British horror!

    I've just watched this obscure little British horror. The only name I recognised in the credits was the writer Richard Matheson. But it turns out that the director was Sidney Hayers, who also directed Circus of Horrors, before he went on to direct a lot of television, including The A Team, The New Avengers and Manimal (does anyone remember that?).

    The plot is a little haywire, but this is a great film. It fits into the horror sub-genre "Housewives and school teachers who get into witchcraft", along with Horror Hotel, Hammer's The Witches, Romero's Season of the Witch and many others, probably. It's got some great visuals, partly due to the very dark black and white photography, it has genuine moments of suspense and the special effects are incredible for a film of its age and low budget. It's also known as Burn, Witch, Burn, which gives it a sensationalist twist that it doesn't really need. Night of the Eagle is a much more appropriate title. I highly recommend this if you can catch it on TV or DVD!
    9ric-29

    Eerie, spooky, and generally terrific

    This is a really excellent black and white spooker with an engaging story and some really creepy moments. The production values are excellent, the acting is very good, and the story and script are both top-notch. Plenty of twists, even if the identity of the villain is a bit obvious, and enough tension to really keep you on the edge of your seat.
    7planktonrules

    Despite the title, it's a lot better than you'd suspect.

    With a title like "Burn, Witch, Burn", I certainly was expecting a lot worse. However, this film is actually quite clever, suspenseful and worth seeing.

    This film begins VERY strangely. The voice of Paul Frees (who provided the voice of Boris on "The Adventures of Rocky & Bullwinkle" and the Haunted Mansion at Disney) announces that there is a demonic curse embedded within the film and he is going to neutralize it with an incantation that is made up of a lot of words for the Devil! Following this, the film begins. The story concerns Professor Taylor (Peter Wyngarde)--a successful professor at a small medical college. One day by chance, he finds some voodoo-like charms hiding around his home. It seems that his wife is a practitioner of some sort of dark art. When he confronts her, she insists the magic has contributed to his career success AND is protecting them from those who wish him harm. Not surprisingly, since he's a man of science he gathers up all her mumbo-jumbo and burns it...and then his life begins falling apart. Apparently someone IS trying to do him harm and without his charms, his and his wife's lives are at stake. But who and why?!

    Aside from one brief scene involving a stuffed bird that is clearly suspended by a wire, the film is very intelligently made. The story is constructed well, is genuinely menacing and is quite enjoyable. And, although the bird is done poorly, just a moment later they make a hawk APPEAR very large and menacing in a very convincing manner. Well worth seeing--nearly earning an 8.
    7gsygsy

    Good movie

    A demonstration that a lot can be achieved on a small budget by imaginative filmmakers. The intensity of this movie took me by surprise. I had expected something more plodding, along the lines of Hammer fare from the same period. Instead, here we have inventive camera-work (DOP Reg Wyer, cameraman future DOP Gerry Turpin), a hardworking score by William Alwyn, and a thoughtful leading man in Peter Wyngarde. Director Sidney Hayers had come from TV, where he seems mostly stayed thereafter - a pity, as he clearly rose to the challenge of this material.

    Best of all are the two excellent performances by Janet Blair and Margaret Johnston. The former, an American who had to come to England to get a part that demonstrated she could really act. The latter, a distinguished stage actress who pulled all the stops out for this rare leading screen role.

    The pace of the film slackens here and there, but recovers in time for a splendid finale. A couple of scenes would have benefited from retakes because of technical glitches, but I suspect there just wasn't enough money left to do them. It's certainly no worse in this respect, though, than NIGHT OF THE DEMON, which is a clear influence. The Jacques Tourneur movie is more satisfying because of the tautness of its screenplay, but in every other way NIGHT OF THE EAGLE (aka BURN, WITCH, BURN) is as good. I wish it were better known. It certainly deserves to be.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Le Cirque des horreurs
    6,0
    Le Cirque des horreurs
    Horror Hotel
    6,7
    Horror Hotel
    La Septième Victime
    6,7
    La Septième Victime
    Frightmare
    6,2
    Frightmare
    Les Vierges de Satan
    6,9
    Les Vierges de Satan
    Les diablesses
    5,7
    Les diablesses
    Burn, Witch, Burn!
    8,2
    Burn, Witch, Burn!
    Hurler de peur
    7,4
    Hurler de peur
    Le cercueil vivant
    6,0
    Le cercueil vivant
    Rendez-vous avec la peur
    7,4
    Rendez-vous avec la peur
    L'Invasion des morts-vivants
    6,5
    L'Invasion des morts-vivants
    Mystères d'outre-tombe
    6,8
    Mystères d'outre-tombe

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      American International Pictures insisted on playing up the horror-occult themes of the film when marketing it. As part of this, the film's original title was changed to the more ominous "Burn, Witch, Burn" - a line that Margaret Johnston speaks in the film. Also, the voice-over opening where a spell is cast upon the audience was added for setting the tone.
    • Gaffes
      At 1:21:48, you can see the guide wire controlling the eagle.stretching from it's leg to it's handler whose back is briefly seen.
    • Citations

      Prologue Narrator: [First lines] Ladies and gentlemen, the motion picture you are about to see contains an evil spell, as used by practitioners of witchcraft for centuries. Even today, in many parts of the world, people practiced black magic and witchcraft. Charms, amulets, voodoo candles, grave dirt, and locks of hair are believed to ward off evil spirits and spells. You may doubt the effectiveness of these spells, but through every civilization, people have believed in witches. Could they all be wrong? I don't think so. For I have see its power, proved too many times. I am now about to dispel all evil spirits that may radiate from the screen during this performance!

      [recites chant]

      Prologue Narrator: And now, with a free mind and a protected soul, we ask you to enjoy, "Burn Witch, Burn."

    • Crédits fous
      There is no The End closing title, just a final "Do You Believe?" to conclude the film.
    • Versions alternatives
      For the American-International release in the United States, a voice-over opening was added which supposedly cast a protective spell over the audience. It was recorded by Paul Frees, using his trademark Orson Welles impression, and adds 2:20 to the original running time.
    • Connexions
      Featured in Chiller Theatre: Burn, Witch, Burn (1976)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ19

    • How long is Night of the Eagle?Alimenté par Alexa
    • Why was Flora crippled and walked with a limp?
    • What was it about the lecture tape that when played caused people to go into trances and become dangerous?

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 31 décembre 2010 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Royaume-Uni
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Night of the Eagle
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Porthcurno Beach, Porthcurno, Cornwall, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni
    • Société de production
      • Independent Artists
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 200 000 $US (estimé)
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 54 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 30min(90 min)
    • Couleur
      • Black and White
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.