Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn an effort to improve the circulation of his notorious scandal magazine, unscrupulous owner, editor and publisher H. R. Manley spares nobody.In an effort to improve the circulation of his notorious scandal magazine, unscrupulous owner, editor and publisher H. R. Manley spares nobody.In an effort to improve the circulation of his notorious scandal magazine, unscrupulous owner, editor and publisher H. R. Manley spares nobody.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Byron
- (non crédité)
- Receptionist
- (non crédité)
- Harry Walsh
- (non crédité)
- Cereal Company Executive
- (non crédité)
- Elsie
- (non crédité)
- Allen J. 'Frank' Frederick
- (non crédité)
- Bill King--Magazine Staffer
- (non crédité)
- Boy
- (non crédité)
- Cereal Company Executive
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
Back in the mid-50's, a lot of folks were tired of Photoplay, Screen Stars, and their like. In short, they wanted insider stories, real low downs on the seamy side of the air-brushed celebs of show biz. Thus Confidential magazine hit the stands with a splash that shook up the whole industry. Hollywood, in particular, quaked in fear; after all, they had big money invested in their carefully molded stars, and any hint of scandal could mean ruin for their investment. Rumors circulated that lesser figures could be sacrificed to the scandal sheets to protect bigger ones, e.g. George Nader to protect Rock Hudson. Of course, public morals were much more stringent in those days. Homosexuality and infidelity, for example, were strictly forbidden, and, if exposed, could wreck a career.
Clearly, Slander is a Hollywood attempt to strike back at the scandal purveyors. Just as clearly, the deck has been loaded by casting choices. Cochran's dark good looks usually translated into tough hoods. Here he still carries a dark appearance and a sinister reputation, but executes the oily slick Manley in expert non-thuggish fashion. It's the most tightly controlled turn I've seen from the fine actor. On the other hand, who embodied All-American virtue more solidly than sandy-haired freckle-faced Van Johnson. Add the sweet innocence of actress Blythe and the boyish appeal of moppet Eyer, and the deck is loaded from the outset.
Nonetheless, the movie's first part setting up Scott's (Johnson) moral dilemma is quite well- done, tight and economical. The second half, however, descends into heavy-handed melodrama, contrived and far-fetched. I take the latter as MGM's effort at hyping the price the magazine and Manley (Cochran) must pay for their unscrupulous acts. Too bad that the screenplay over-hyped this second part since the trade-off's sleaze factor is enough to discredit the magazine's shady enterprise. At the same time, the contrivances not only overdo the worthy message, but work to remind us that this is only a movie, after all.
Of course, changes in public morals have dated the movie. Nonetheless, with a less contrived second half, the film might succeed on its own merits, even now.
Well, first of all, it should have been called "Libel" which refers to the printed word; slander refers to the spoken. You'd think after years of dealing with both, someone at MGM would have known the difference.
Steve Cochran plays the head of this trash magazine, a type of periodical nowadays so common one doesn't even blink. In the film, his magazine was the pioneer, probably modeled after the real-life "Confidential." As in the film, a host of me-toos followed - in the '50s, this included "Whisper" and "Quick" magazines. These mags released Rory Calhoun's criminal record, accused Lisabeth Scott of using the services of call girls, that sort of thing. Something about the black and white format of the early tabloids made them even sleazier than "The Enquirer" types today, which deal mostly with gossip, hospital records sold to them by the hospital staff, and outing of celebrities. Eventually celebrities fought back by breaking their news first on talk shows.
H.R. Manley (Cochran) believes that everybody has some dirt in their past, and he's after a huge female film star. He knows that a children's TV performer, Scott Martin (Johnson) grew up with her and knows about a problem in her past. He finds out that Martin himself spent four years in prison for armed robbery and intends to print that story and ruin his career if Martin doesn't tell him what happened to his childhood friend. Does he save himself and let her career be sacrificed? His decision leads to tragedy.
Cochran is cold as ice as Manley and handsome in a George Clooney-Tyrone Power kind of way. His facial expression never changes, nor does his smooth voice. He's a man with a dead soul. His mother, played by Marjorie Rambeau, is against what he does to make a living. Rambeau, a favorite actress of mine, is excellent. Van Johnson and Ann Blyth are the Martins; Blyth is really more suited for society women - she's very pretty and also not the warmest person to stand before a camera. But she does a good job, as does Johnson, who is very well cast as a family man and children's entertainer.
The story is dramatized in a somewhat extreme way. It will definitely hold your interest, though the ending could have been better.
Steve Cochran, generally an inarticulate brute in films, here plays the slick, debonair owner of a notorious gossip magazine who is anxious to break a big scandal to reverse a recent decline in sales. He zeroes in on children's entertainer Van Johnson, a decent, stand-up guy who nonetheless has a secret in his past which would most likely end his suddenly flourishing television career if found out. Johnson can save himself and his family from disrepute if he "trades" Cochran damaging information he has about a popular movie actress he knew while growing up in a tough neighborhood years ago.
The movie chronicles this moral dilemma in a balanced, intelligent way, methodically laying the emotional and intellectual groundwork for the difficult choices the major characters end up making. It's one of those nifty little flicks that reminds one of some efficient piece of machinery - no wasted motion.
Cochran once again is excellent. His technique is exceptional, unerring. He's got this guy, a bullying, insecure poser, down. Watch the scene in the restaurant where he finds out that he's being bumped from a TV talk show due to a fellow guest's refusal to appear on the same program with him. Just before the steely resignation and the business-like thirst for payback, he's hurt, like a little boy who finds out he hasn't made first team. Johnson and Blyth are appealing as the devoted husband and wife, as is the child actor Richard Eyer, who plays their son.
But special mention has to go to the great Marjorie Rambeau, sort of a Susan Sarandon type in her younger days, here she plays Cochran's weary, alcoholic, deeply ashamed mother. Her impossibly large, sad, soulful eyes aptly foreshadow the tragedies that follow.
Back in 1957 Confidential Magazine which was the prototype of things like the National Enquirer of today was publishing all kinds of exposes on celebrities. Cochran's rag is also looking to do an expose on Van Johnson who is a newly popular host of a kid's show. Back during the Depression he committed a holdup and did his time and Cochran wants an to expose him. Cochran though will back off if he will give him some dirt on another girl who grew up on his block who became a big movie star.
Cochran is such a rat that he approaches Johnson through his wife Ann Blyth. This raises all kinds of issues in their marriage.
Slander also makes some subtle references to the tactics of the House Un American Activities Committee and how they would 'trade up' with immunity if someone would give them a bigger prize.
Johnson and Blyth turn in some good performances, but it's really Cochran you have to watch. He will thoroughly creep you out.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesPuppets in the movie were designed and operated (except in long shots) by Jack Shafton, who is listed as the uncredited puppeteer. Additional manipulation was by Bob Hume. Two of the figures are in the collection of The Magic Castle in Hollywood, and one in the collection of the Dallas Puppet Theater.
- GaffesAlthough the movie is titled "Slander", there is no evidence that any of the characters were a victim of that crime, which refers to a malicious false statement. From the evidence, all of the stories, particularly that of the hero, presented in the scandal magazine were true.
- Citations
H.R. Manley: Mother, do you realize what I have done? Do you have any conception of the size of my accomplishment? In less than two short years, I have built up the biggest newsstand circulation of any magazine in America. And you ask me to walk away from it because of a few stupid remarks on a television program?
Mrs. Manley: You don't really think it's really one TV program? Why, this has been going on for nearly two years... ever since you started the magazine. You have been constantly rebuffed... constantly attacked. And it makes me feel ashamed. I don't want to be ashamed of my son.
H.R. Manley: Mother, you have nothing to be ashamed of. I am giving the people of this country something they... something they not only want but something they need. I'm giving them the truth. Every month more than 5 million of them walk up to their newsstands. They're not bribed... they're not threatened. They come because they want what I have to sell.
Mrs. Manley: That same argument could be advanced by the people who sell opium to the Chinese persons.
H.R. Manley: The truth is not an opiate. The truth never really hurt anyone.
Mrs. Manley: It didn't do Governor Chetnam's daughter much good.
H.R. Manley: Governor Chetnam's daughter did not attempt suicide because of anything I said about her. She did it because neurotic, sick, weak people are always attempting to find an excuse to... to dramatize themselves in the eyes of the world. If she hadn't used me, she would have found another. Some day she will find another excuse. Will I be at fault then?
Mrs. Manley: I'm no prophet. I can't predict what will happen. But I do know what has happened.
- Crédits fousOpening credits are shown over gossip magazines coming towards the camera. When they are gone, the remaining credits are shown in a puddle of black ink.
- ConnexionsRemake of Studio One: A Public Figure (1956)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 926 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée1 heure 21 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.66 : 1