NOTE IMDb
6,0/10
590
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueGovernment agent tries to trick a suspect into returning to Germany, the scene of his crimes.Government agent tries to trick a suspect into returning to Germany, the scene of his crimes.Government agent tries to trick a suspect into returning to Germany, the scene of his crimes.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Louis Merrill
- Herr Schmitt
- (as Lou Merril)
John Albright
- Man on Dock
- (non crédité)
Vince Barnett
- Ed
- (non crédité)
Phil Bloom
- Bar Patron
- (non crédité)
Danny Borzage
- Accordionist
- (non crédité)
George Cisar
- Don Gillen
- (non crédité)
Judy Clark
- Singer
- (non crédité)
Roy Damron
- Bar Patron
- (non crédité)
Van Des Autels
- Tom Jackson
- (non crédité)
Harold Dyrenforth
- German Guard
- (non crédité)
Richard Emory
- Doc Mason
- (non crédité)
Joseph Glick
- Boat Passenger
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
As far as I know, that's the second film noir that director Nathan Juran offered us, besides HIGHWAY DRAGNET. He who was mostly a western and science fiction maker, working for Universal and Columbia studios as well. I like here more the atmosphere and photography than the story. This is a pure good B thriller typical of the fifties. Very agreeable to watch, and also a rare film, at least not the most known of the director. Yes, the story is not that exciting for a crime film noir, but it remains bearable. I have seen it several times already but always forget about it. I understand why after the watching.
Yes, the cast is great. Yes the first ten minutes or so, up to and including the first twist, is a great movie.
But after that it goes so completely insane in a way that's super not fun or campy or bombastic. It somehow manages to be both boring, and implausible. The plot folds in over on itself. It's just very, very bad writing.
Right now, this has an average of a six. I just think that's way way too high. This deserves a four at best, and so I'm on here to try to push that to happen. I love noir, and I've now watched so many, to relive the high of first seeing the greats. I've seen so many bad ones. This is the worst one I've ever seen.
But after that it goes so completely insane in a way that's super not fun or campy or bombastic. It somehow manages to be both boring, and implausible. The plot folds in over on itself. It's just very, very bad writing.
Right now, this has an average of a six. I just think that's way way too high. This deserves a four at best, and so I'm on here to try to push that to happen. I love noir, and I've now watched so many, to relive the high of first seeing the greats. I've seen so many bad ones. This is the worst one I've ever seen.
Richard Denning, Frank Lovejoy, and Mari Blanchard are the Center-Piece of this Sprawling Story of a WWII Murder Suspect Pursued Years Later.
This Mid-50's B&W B-Movie is Film-Noir Influenced in Tone with some Sharp Twists and a Striking Look at L. A. and other Far-Off Locations.
The Tension is Taught with Deception, Double-Cross, and Misdirection.
It's a Complicated Scenario to Fit into such a Short Low-Budget Effort.
But the Good Production Team Make it Work Somewhat.
A Suspension of Disbelief is Required to Take it All In with Ease,
but Watching the Good Trio of Interesting Working-Class Actors make it Fun to Observe.
Mari Blanchard has a Difficult Role Balancing Between Denning and Lovejoy.
Pretending Permeates the Picture as She is One Thing while Being Another During the Length of the Film.
Drawing a Murder-Suspect into the Light with a Plot Point that is as Interestingly Far-Fetched as it gets.
The Story Sucks You In,
as the Uneasy Trio of Would-Be Criminals make Their Way Through the Machinations of a Pulp Story of Hidden Treasure and Undercover Intrigue.
A Slightly Above Average Little Movie with a Good Cast and an Over-the-Top Story is...
Worth a Watch.
This Mid-50's B&W B-Movie is Film-Noir Influenced in Tone with some Sharp Twists and a Striking Look at L. A. and other Far-Off Locations.
The Tension is Taught with Deception, Double-Cross, and Misdirection.
It's a Complicated Scenario to Fit into such a Short Low-Budget Effort.
But the Good Production Team Make it Work Somewhat.
A Suspension of Disbelief is Required to Take it All In with Ease,
but Watching the Good Trio of Interesting Working-Class Actors make it Fun to Observe.
Mari Blanchard has a Difficult Role Balancing Between Denning and Lovejoy.
Pretending Permeates the Picture as She is One Thing while Being Another During the Length of the Film.
Drawing a Murder-Suspect into the Light with a Plot Point that is as Interestingly Far-Fetched as it gets.
The Story Sucks You In,
as the Uneasy Trio of Would-Be Criminals make Their Way Through the Machinations of a Pulp Story of Hidden Treasure and Undercover Intrigue.
A Slightly Above Average Little Movie with a Good Cast and an Over-the-Top Story is...
Worth a Watch.
I laughed and laughed as I watched this. I confess I like the storyline, but that's where it ends. How reviewers are rating this a minimum of 6 out of 10 is beyond me.
If you're a fan of cold war films from the mid-1950s that reference World War II propaganda, then this film will delight. It doesn't take long into the running time to figure out some plot devices I won't reveal. If you watch it through all the way, just remember the dialogue, "Two men and a girl."
This is some weird crap. It's a great plunge into why television devoured filmgoing when Lucille Ball was trying to figure out how to make her husband more successful than she.
If you're a fan of cold war films from the mid-1950s that reference World War II propaganda, then this film will delight. It doesn't take long into the running time to figure out some plot devices I won't reveal. If you watch it through all the way, just remember the dialogue, "Two men and a girl."
This is some weird crap. It's a great plunge into why television devoured filmgoing when Lucille Ball was trying to figure out how to make her husband more successful than she.
This noir film is unusual in that its biggest surprises occur in the first half of the movie. The user reviews that consist mostly of recounting the plot thus spoil the effect of seeing it for the first time. If you think you'd like to watch it, I recommend avoiding them.
It's usually best to save surprises for the end of a story, but given the film's plot it would have been difficult.
Without giving away too much, Frank Lovejoy plays an LA drive-in restaurant owner and compulsive gambler who gets inveigled into a plot to recover Nazi loot hidden during WW II.
The second half of the film is straight adventure and suspense, much of the latter coming from trying to guess who is or isn't in on what seems to be a rather large conspiracy for a relatively small goal.
Co-stars Mari Blanchard and Richard Denning are enjoyable in juicier parts than Lovejoy's. An enjoyable watch even if a tad implausible in spots.
It's usually best to save surprises for the end of a story, but given the film's plot it would have been difficult.
Without giving away too much, Frank Lovejoy plays an LA drive-in restaurant owner and compulsive gambler who gets inveigled into a plot to recover Nazi loot hidden during WW II.
The second half of the film is straight adventure and suspense, much of the latter coming from trying to guess who is or isn't in on what seems to be a rather large conspiracy for a relatively small goal.
Co-stars Mari Blanchard and Richard Denning are enjoyable in juicier parts than Lovejoy's. An enjoyable watch even if a tad implausible in spots.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe real Stan's Diner, at the intersection of Sunset and Hollywood Blvds. in East Los Angeles, features prominently in the film. This particular Stan's, one of several operating in the Los Angeles area, no longer exists, but many other landmarks that still survive at this intersection are visible. Most notably, the Vista Theatre can been seen in several shots; this single-screen theater from 1926 is still in operation as of 2023.
- GaffesIn the back-projection driving scenes, the steering wheel movements bear no relation to what is seen out of the back window.
- Citations
Joanie Daniel: Toot your horn, Stan. I could use some curb service.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Fantastical Features - Nathan Juran at Columbia (2023)
- Bandes originalesPut the Blame on Mame
(1946) (uncredited)
Written by Allan Roberts and Doris Fisher
Played on the juke box at The Barn
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Crooked Web?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Crooked Web
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 17 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Piège double (1955) officially released in India in English?
Répondre