Le rio de la mort

Again Bunuel delivers a grand movie, that is top notch, from beginning to the end. While exploring more human faults, as in his other movies I have watched at the Berlin Film Festival, he digs deep inside the homo sapiens and shows us our flaws, while the characters don't really understand that they're acting irrational. And even if they do try to swerve from this "circle", it seems inevitable that they fall back into it.

Great acting and a great story get mixed together with a nice framing by Bunuel, who understands how he can use the medium film, to portray human stories, that do touch us (as in this case). Some might feel, that the pacing could've been a bit faster, but I do think that it is better this way. Slow but steady into ... Watch it and you won't be disappointed!

A small town by the shore of a deep, dark river is ruled by death. Its people live by a code of honor that encourages them to take revenge for any form of insult, no matter how insignificant. A seemingly never ending blood feud ravages the town, as the men, one by one, kill each other proudly, embracing their acts of murder with a sense of mission. Vengeance is considered not so much a crime as an act of courage. However, if a murderer manages to escape without being killed in return, he's banished from the town and left with no option but to cross the river and to live on the desolate, opposite shore. The dead are also taken across the river, inside their coffin, and buried in a distant cemetery. Few are those who oppose this violent way of life and little is what they can do about it. Gerardo, a young man of modern thought who studied medicine in the nearest big city, must return to his hometown and try to put an end to this delirious, anachronistic, macho gun culture.

The story and the dialogues are great, and so is the acting! Like in much of Buñuel's other work, a terrible, dreamlike beauty emerges as man's passions and ignorant values devour virtue. In this case, sin appears not so much in the form of lust but of a ferocious sense of vanity (disguised as "honor").

Though quite surreal in essence, the film feels more mainstream than the director's work from later decades. The humor here, though clearly present in the absurdity of the situation, is relatively restrained, and the music is at times a little bit campy. The story itself is linear and fairly straight-forward. The ending is perhaps the only small disappointment, not so much because it's so atypical for a Buñuel film, but because it's so sudden.

The black and white photography is very decent, although the image quality of the DVD that I watched was a little bit deteriorated. It would be a real treat to watch an enhanced version.

I hardly doubt that anyone considers this one of Buñuel's unique masterpieces, but it's still a great, extremely enjoyable film with a strong message and, personally, I highly recommend watching it.

This film is hard to follow to my untrained eyes in black and white cinema. Not that I haven't seen many black and white movies, but this story, in typical Buñuel fashion, jumps seamlessly back and forth between characters in the present, and close and distant past. Making it hard to follow, but nonetheless, I was able to appreciate it and enjoyed both the rural Mexico, as well as the folk culture.

The story begins with a naive toast between two men, one who just became a parent, and the other, the godfather of the child. As the celebration and tequilas start flowing, both men talk about their future, families and friendship. When the big-mouthed godfather jokingly suggests sexual interaction with the mother of his godson, the other man, the husband, gets furious and violently demands respect or otherwise. The godfather, another short-fused macho, takes that to the extreme and in return, says he can say whatever he can say. After this, the recent parent pulls out his knife and shoves it in the godfather's belly. This becoming the beginning of the three generation tragedy that was about to unravel in this Mexican northern town of machos.

What follows is the narration from a doctor, the then child given birth in the tragic ceremony. The grandson of the killer, is a doctor now prostrate in a special stretcher treating his disease that prevents him from walking.

This film tells the story of my home country. Fully it reflects its culture, where a man is expected to prove his manhood through any means.

It sadly reminded me of why Mexico is considered one of the most violent countries in the world. Where narcos and government alike revert to violence in a never ending cycle of proving yourself. Where the value of a human life is no more valuable than cattle, land or respect in itself.

A must see to understand why rivalries exist in Mexico, and to understand why grassroots measures work best than any other foreign facts.

A mockery during a Day of the Dead The celebration at a Mexican village unleashes the relentless enmity between two families : Anguiano and Menchaca , generation after generation relives it where a gun is worth more than a horse. Nowadays , there are only two sons left, one in each family. One , Gerardo (Joaquin Cordero) , has become a doctor in the big city and his culture is modern. The other last one Felipe : Miguel Torruco - of the other family - hasn't left the village and is waiting for the doctor to come "home" as he plans to murder him , to settle this war on this matter of honor once and for all. One is a doctor without a stomach for brutality, his head sticks out of a vast iron lung when the other goes on to demand a confrontation . When the doctor finally comes to the village, because of his mother (Columba Domínguez) influenced by the villagers, he faces the other contender who challenges his courage. A fragile amnesty with his nemesis is repressed by the cowardly mediator , the sheer weight of hardened tradition and clan expectations quickly crush both enemy familes . It is a wild world, it is up to the children to change it.

The main subject is the absurdity of tribal machismo, the camera sweeps across the top of a colonial building before leaning toward the dirt street where a three-way crossfire casually takes place . The interpretations are all solid and photography never less than competent . Dealing with a merciless vengeance through years and years , when men, sons, have killed each other for generations, for a so-called conception of honor in a revenge that never ends since it is also triggered by people of the little town , resulting in the people of the village want blood . The pistol and the icon of the Virgin Mary occupy the same belt, even the local priest comes armed to a card game . The river is deep and murky , people cross it in the fugitive or in a coffin in the black canoe , the hero lives both ways. Circle of hate as a strange habit , the waste of vengeful honor, the clarification of cowardice and the violent stand-off , thus a superb western style by the Spanish maestro Luis Buñuel . And others questions of making peace , letting the dead bury the dead , just a hug on the main street to break the curse are also displayed . Here the violence is unglamorous, there's a priest carrying a gun, and it's not often that you see a man with an iron lung get slapped, surreal amusements or the usual perversities of Buñuel, but otherwise, this is pretty fine flick . The structure is a bit out of place, starting with a flashback to an era that has nothing to do with either the contemporary period or the long flashback of Gerardo's parents that takes up most of the running time. And the ending is so straightforward that one wishes it weren't so sincere. But in general, it is a fairly well-constructed film, although it lacks the ordinary nuances of much interest for fans of Buñuel's style.

It includes atmospheric cinematography in black and white by Raul Solares , shot on location in Huauchinango, Puebla, Mexico. The motion picture written by his usual collaborator Luis Alcoriza was well directed by Luis Buñuel , but there aren't many of the director's signature touches. Buñuel's sensibilities actually do quite well in the Western language, tearing down outdated macho standards and petty hypocrisy. This Spanish filmmaker was voted the 14th Greatest Director of all time . This Buñuel's strange film belongs to his Mexican second period ; in fact , it's plenty of known Mexican actors . As Buñuel subsequently emigrated from Mexico to France where filmed other excellent movies . After moving to Paris , at the beginning Buñuel did a variety of film-related odd jobs , including working as an assistant to director Jean Epstein . With financial help from his mother and creative assistance from Dalí, he made his first film , this 17-minute "Un Chien Andalou" (1929), and immediately catapulted himself into film history thanks to its disturbing images and surrealist plot . The following year , sponsored by wealthy art patrons, he made his first picture , the scabrous witty and violent "Age of Gold" (1930), which mercilessly attacked the church and the middle classes, themes that would preoccupy Buñuel for the rest of his career . After his two avant-garde collaborations with fellow surrealist Salvador Dali , his career, though, seemed almost over by the mid-1930s, as he found work increasingly hard to come by and after the Spanish Civil War , where he made ¨Las Hurdes¨ , as Luis emigrated to the US where he worked for the Museum of Modern Art and as a film dubber for Warner Bros . He subsequently went on his Mexican period he teamed up with producer Óscar Dancigers and after a couple of unmemorable efforts shot back to international attention , reappearing at Cannes with ¨Los Olvidados¨ in 1951 , a lacerating study of Mexican street urchins , winning him the Best Director award at the Cannes Film Festival. But despite this new-found acclaim, Buñuel spent much of the next decade working on a variety of ultra-low-budget films, few of which made much impact outside Spanish-speaking countries , though many of them are well worth seeking out . As he went on filming "The Great Madcap" , ¨The brute¨, "Wuthering Heights", ¨El¨ , ¨Susana¨ , "The Criminal Life of Archibaldo De la Cruz" , ¨Robinson Crusoe¨ , ¨Death in the garden¨ and many others . His mostly little-known Mexican films , rough-hewn , low-budget melodramas for the most part , are always thought-provoking and interesting ; being ordinary screenwriter Julio Alejandro and Luis Alcoriza . He continued working there until re-establishing himself in Europe in the 1960s as one of the great directors . And finally his French-Spanish period in collaboration with producer Serge Silberman and writer Jean-Claude Carrière with notorious as well as polemic films such as ¨Viridiana¨ was prohibited on the grounds of blasphemy , ¨Tristana¨ , ¨The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie" , of course , ¨ ¨Belle Du Jour¨ , with all the kinky French sex and his last picture , "That Obscure Object of Desire" .

I saw this one last night, just knowing that is considered a minor work in Buñuel's career, and I have to disagree because being an old movie with a relative plane plot, it kept me really interested from beginning to end so I had to watch it completely, considering that I was really tired last night ...

The story about the town, the river, the traditions of the people who lived there, the constant fights between the Anguianos and the Menchacas, are quite thrilling and charming on a certain point of view If you're looking for strange situations, surprises, surrealism, plot twists, black humor (excepting the priest with the gun) and absurdity, you may be disappointed by this film I love Buñuel films, and I fully enjoyed this one