Les rebelles

this was yet another solid performance by joel mccrea. yvonne de carlo also adds strength to this feature. the film portrays a turbulent time in our history and the the film portrays just how dedicated some membersof the confederacy were in prolonging the war.

This film begins with a Confederate officer by the name of "Major Clete Mattison" (Joel McCrea) barely escaping from Union cavalry by crossing the Rio Grande into Mexico. Although he is shot and wounded for his efforts he is allowed sanctuary into that specific part of the country by a corrupt Mexican Army commander named "General Calleja" (Pedro Armendariz) who has received intelligence reports that Major Mattison has stolen over $2 million in gold-and both he and several of his business associates want it badly. Further complicating matters for him is that there is a specific woman named "Carmelita Carias" (Yvonne De Carlo) who has caught his eye and the fact that Major Mattison has begun spending some time with her infuriates him to no small extent as well. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this was a mediocre Western which suffered somewhat by the rather bland acting of all of the aforementioned actors involved. Likewise, I didn't quite care for the abrasive character of Major Mattison either. Be that as it may, while I don't consider this to be a terribly bad film, it didn't really impress me that much and I have rated it accordingly. Slightly below average.

terrible screenplay, terrible actors, bad and weak screenplay, ridiculous scenarios and plots. there's nothing worth praising whatsoever. guy was chased by soldiers, was shot crossed the river, then woke up in the hotel, then suddenly wearing all custom made new shirt, jacket and pants and hat showed up in the bar, then again, he kept changing into tailor made dresses after finished one scene. those dresses were ironed and pressed and so fit on his body. all the fights were poorly carried out. the dialog and acting by most supporting actors were just overly exaggerated and pretentious to the extreme. you need to turn of your I.Q. to watch this stupid western movie. the heist of the gold about two million dollars worth was another joke. the scenes by the river with stupid quick sand also was just too stupid to watch. all the fighting scenes just looked stupid and fake. there are so many good western movies from 1940 to 1970, but this one definitely is not one of them.

In the last days of the Civil War, Confederate officer Joel McCrea and associates rob a Union storehouse of $2,000,000. They head down to a small patch of Mexican territory controlled by renegade general Pedro Armendariz and start negotiating to turn that into arms for the Confederacy. McCrea gets various offers -- and attempted beatings -- from people who think the gold and a ticket to Europe are better to have, although Armendariz's mistress, Yvonne De Carlo is warmly friendly.

This seems to have been movie shot in three-strip Technicolor, and under cinematographer Irving Glassberg, it offers the rich blacks that process excelled in. Director George Sherman, an expert in "Shaky A" westerns, directs the script well enough, and themain cast is excellent. With Armendariz weaselly under his bravado, De Carlo sad and cynical, and McCrea, as aways, bluff and straightforward. A very pleasant movie.

As a longtime Joel McCrea fan, I thought I had seen most all, if not all, of his westerns. But I evidently was wrong (for once in my 75 years!!!), as I had never seen this one until it showed up on the Western Channel recently.

As westerns go it was "Ho-um", which was surprising considering the cast: Joel McCrea, Luscious Yvonne De Carlo, and the always hilarious Alfonso Bedoya; who's animated performance steals every scene he is in.

Other reviewers have criticized this film for its sympathetic portrayal of Southern rebels trying to get stolen Yankee gold to the Confederacy, but this is not the first film to do a similar story. Virginia City with Errol Flynn & Randolph Scott, and Great Day in the morning with Robert Stack are two that come to mind. All three of these are fanciful Civil War out west tales about a Confederate scheme at the last minute to smuggle several millions in gold bullion into the South for supplies to keep the war going. And what happens in the end of all of these strains credulity to say the least.

BUT, these are movies, NOT documentaries, and made for entertainment, to sell tickets & popcorn, not to pay homage to the South, and not to be to closely analyzed as there are plenty of ridiculous plot holes and unreal situations.

Since this film was directed by George Sherman I had expected it to have the same quality great action scenes that he had been known for in all his many westerns from the 30's & 40's. Needless to say it fell flat there for the most part.

One area that they tried to be accurate on was the type of handgun every one carried: the Remington 1858 Cap & ball, fairly correct for the period. Except during the final showdown/shootout they more conveniently substituted the Single Action Colt, which was modified to look like the Remington. My guess is that this was more economical as it allowed used of the then popular 5-in-1 blanks used in most Westerns. For the uninitiated, these were blanks that would fit & fire in any revolver of 38-40, 44-40, 45 Colt calibers, and lever actions of 38-40 or 44-40 calibers.

The best part of any western, especially ones shot in color, are the beautiful outdoor location scenes, and here they almost overshadow the weak script.

This could've been a really good western, it's a shame it didn't live up to its potential, but its worth watching if only for the two leads.