Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueEdward Jekyll, ignorant of how his father had brought forth death and destruction with his experiments, is pursuing a chemist career despite the fact that he has been discharged from school ... Tout lireEdward Jekyll, ignorant of how his father had brought forth death and destruction with his experiments, is pursuing a chemist career despite the fact that he has been discharged from school or his unorthodox experimentations. When the time comes for his father's estate, which had... Tout lireEdward Jekyll, ignorant of how his father had brought forth death and destruction with his experiments, is pursuing a chemist career despite the fact that he has been discharged from school or his unorthodox experimentations. When the time comes for his father's estate, which had been put in trust, Edward first learns of his father's actions and rather than ignore the... Tout lire
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Coachman
- (non crédité)
- Tenement Landlord
- (non crédité)
- Woman
- (non crédité)
- Insp. Grey
- (non crédité)
- William Bennett
- (non crédité)
- Hazel Sorelle
- (non crédité)
- Magistrate
- (non crédité)
- Copy Boy
- (non crédité)
- Constable
- (non crédité)
- Man in Bar
- (non crédité)
- Woman in Window
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
* 1/2 (out of 4)
Dr. Jekyll's son (Louis Hayward) goes back to the laboratory to try and prove his father wasn't a monster. This film actually gets off to a pretty good start but things quickly fall apart making this a rather poor film in the end. The performances from everyone in the cast are actually pretty good, which is shocking for this type of film. The first transformation scene is also very well effective but after this there isn't much here. The film seems to think that the viewers didn't want to see a monster but instead sit around and listen to bad dialogue. There's way too much talk going on in this film and this here makes it quite boring.
It's easy to see why this film was titled The Son of Dr. Jekyll and not The Son of Mr. Hyde. Other than the opening scene where Hyde (I'm not entirely sure it was Hyde) has about five minutes of screen time, we see him for less than 10 seconds in the rest of the film. Very disappointing. Without Hyde, Dr. Jekyll has a tough time carrying a movie by himself.
The movie is really more of a crime mystery than a horror regardless of how it is listed on IMDb. The "son" spends the majority of the movie tying to figure out who is framing him as mad killer. While it is a decent enough idea for a movie, the killer's true identity is given away so early that there are few dramatic or tense moments later on.
THE SON OF DR. JEKYLL has the titular offspring, Edward Jekyll (Louis Hayward) picking up where dear old dad left off. Mad science commences when Edward sets out to prove the merit of his father's experiments. Using his father's laboratory, he recreates the fateful formula.
What could possibly go wrong?
TSODJ is a decent follow-up to the classic DR. JEKYLL movies, with the added twist of a nefarious character who causes big trouble for Edward.
A solid entry in the SON OF... sub genre...
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWhen Edward is altered by his father's formula, makeup artist Clay Campbell used colored filters to effect the change. He had applied red makeup to Louis Hayward and then passed a two color filter - red and bluish-green - in front of the camera lens. The makeup looked normal under the red filter, but turned dark and scary as the camera shot through the blue-green one. Makeup artist Wally Westmore used the same technique in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931).
- Gaffeswhen Edward is writing his notes down, he misspells the word nothing twice: spelling it nothnig.
- Citations
Lottie Sorelle: The pity of it was - she believed in him, right to the end!
Edward Jekyll: Are you sure?
Lottie Sorelle: Why, I was with her that day, when he came in, murder in his heart - like a beast!
- ConnexionsFeatured in TJ and the All Night Theatre: The Son of Dr. Jekyll (1978)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 18min(78 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1