NOTE IMDb
6,3/10
293
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThis documentary traces man's attempts to fly from ancient times through the 1930s.This documentary traces man's attempts to fly from ancient times through the 1930s.This documentary traces man's attempts to fly from ancient times through the 1930s.
Charles Lefeaux
- Louis Bleriot
- (as Charles Lefaux)
Charles Frend
- Narrator
- (voix)
Edward Ashley
- Minor Role
- (non crédité)
Italo Balbo
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Memo Benassi
- Francesco Lama di Brescia
- (non crédité)
Denville Bond
- Oliver of Malmesbury
- (non crédité)
Tom Campbell Black
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Charles Carrett
- Latham's manager
- (non crédité)
Andrea Checchi
- Zoroastro
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
Some of the other reviewers answered certain questions I had about this film. Certainly what I saw today was not the original production of Conquest Of The Air. What apparently this film tried to be was the first docudrama ever done. If someone can recall an earlier one I'll stand corrected. That additional newsreel footage of Winston Churchill who was probably First Lord of the Admiralty when it was shot indicates a second World War had begun which promised and delivered to be more terrible than the last.
Taking the story of man's fascination of flying back to ancient mythological days, Conquest Of The Air shows a patient building block like achievement of man trying to get off the ground and travel like the birds. For earlier times they're recreated with players and sets the most prominent being Laurence Olivier.
As an educational film Conquest Of The Air is informative, but as entertainment it falls far short of the mark.
Taking the story of man's fascination of flying back to ancient mythological days, Conquest Of The Air shows a patient building block like achievement of man trying to get off the ground and travel like the birds. For earlier times they're recreated with players and sets the most prominent being Laurence Olivier.
As an educational film Conquest Of The Air is informative, but as entertainment it falls far short of the mark.
The most interesting parts of this film are the docudrama installments at the beginning. At the same time, the reenactment of medieval and renaissance pioneers leaping off the tops of buildings to their inevitable splattering needs only a calliope or an MST3K accompaniment to be completely ridiculous. But the content is very interesting for anyone who loves aviation. It could be more entertaining, though.
The date for this film is puzzling. It is listed as being 1936, but contains footage of the Hindenburg disaster and the loss of Wiley Post and Amelia Earhart, distinctly mentioning the year 1938. Was there an updated re-release as the need to inform the British public about air power on the verge of WWII?
The date for this film is puzzling. It is listed as being 1936, but contains footage of the Hindenburg disaster and the loss of Wiley Post and Amelia Earhart, distinctly mentioning the year 1938. Was there an updated re-release as the need to inform the British public about air power on the verge of WWII?
NOTE: While the release date on IMDb says it's 1936, there is a problem with this date. The film version I saw went up to 1938. Perhaps more material was added and I watched a re-release. Or, what's more likely is that the 1936 date is an error.
"Conquest of the Air" is a strange film in that there is a lot to admire and a lot to dislike. On the plus side, it's a nice and rather comprehensive review of the history of flight--with a strong emphasis on the botched attempts to fly from the middle ages up to about 1800. There also is a nice bit about ballooning and dirigibles. So, historically speaking, it's a nice educational overview. HOWEVER, while I admire the film in recreating so many nice tableaux, the narration is dreadfully boring and the film often comes off as an awful educational film--the sort they used to bore kids with in the good old days. Surely this could have been made in a more interesting fashion--this coming from a guy who LOVES airplanes and historical films. In addition, there were some curious omissions--such as the deaths of many of the famous people (such as Wilbur Wright during one of his flights). Worth seeing if you adore planes and balloons but not for the easily bored.
By the way, I think if the film had featured less aviators and spent more time on the most important the overall film would have been more interesting and far less episodic.
"Conquest of the Air" is a strange film in that there is a lot to admire and a lot to dislike. On the plus side, it's a nice and rather comprehensive review of the history of flight--with a strong emphasis on the botched attempts to fly from the middle ages up to about 1800. There also is a nice bit about ballooning and dirigibles. So, historically speaking, it's a nice educational overview. HOWEVER, while I admire the film in recreating so many nice tableaux, the narration is dreadfully boring and the film often comes off as an awful educational film--the sort they used to bore kids with in the good old days. Surely this could have been made in a more interesting fashion--this coming from a guy who LOVES airplanes and historical films. In addition, there were some curious omissions--such as the deaths of many of the famous people (such as Wilbur Wright during one of his flights). Worth seeing if you adore planes and balloons but not for the easily bored.
By the way, I think if the film had featured less aviators and spent more time on the most important the overall film would have been more interesting and far less episodic.
Firstly, many reviewers have already mentioned this film as listed 1936, but as I write it has transported itself back to 1931. Churchill as PM suggests it's final version is almost 10 years younger.
The drama elements of this docu-drama are in the first half and are both educational and fun in an almost Pythonesque way (you'll know what I mean when you get to the 3rd tower jumper). As the amount of archive material becomes more available, obviously, in the 20th C. We get more documentary and in last segment slide into necessary propaganda.
Worth a watch, I learned something, not all that much, but something.
The drama elements of this docu-drama are in the first half and are both educational and fun in an almost Pythonesque way (you'll know what I mean when you get to the 3rd tower jumper). As the amount of archive material becomes more available, obviously, in the 20th C. We get more documentary and in last segment slide into necessary propaganda.
Worth a watch, I learned something, not all that much, but something.
Originally made in 1931 with a couple of updates in 1937 and again in 1940, using historical recreations in the first part and switching more to a documentary style for the later parts. The recreations are a bit hit and miss most seem to give historical French, Italian and German characters broad English accents but Laurence Olivier gives his character an attempt at a genuine accent. A young Michael Rennie also makes a brief appearance. Ends on a rather odd note talking of the future use of peaceful flight showing gliders, but the footage used is from Germany and was in fact the method Germany used to train pilots to get around WWI restrictions on it's airforce. But overall, considering it's 1931 origin not a bad film.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesTheatrical movie debut of Alan Wheatley (Borelli).
- GaffesLilenthal is still breathing when he is discovered 'dead' by his assistant.
- Citations
Vincent Lunardi: In a few years, the sky will be filled with balloons!
- Versions alternativesThe version shown on Turner Classic Movies is the updated one from 1940, as it includes footage of the Hindenburg disaster of 1937.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Round the Film Studios: No. 2 Denham Part 5 (1937)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 11 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.20 : 1(original aspect ratio)
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant