Dernière lune de miel

I couldn't disagree more with the other review of this film. I watched it alone on Talking Pictures a few days ago and I thought it was wonderful. The appearance of Una O'Connor at the the start, the very two very attractive ladies in the female lead parts and Franchot Tone with his wonderful comedic touch. The depiction of post war America etc etc. I loved it all and went to bed a happy man

Despite the presence of Franchot Tone and Ton Conway, "Lost Honeymoon" is a truly dreadful film--with a stupid premise and amazingly bad writing. It made me cringe and I pray that you read this review and think twice about seeing this turkey.

When the film begins, you learn that a British lady has died and her twin children are being kept by her landlady. However, there IS a father--some American named John Gray. So, an amazingly stupid lady (Ann Richards) decides she's going to go to the States to find the man--a guy who married the now dead lady while was stationed in Britain during the war. However, instead of going about this is a sane manner, she decides to tell the Red Cross that she IS the dead woman and gets them to pay for her voyage with the two children. Once she's in America, she seems to automatically know that THE John Gray she wants is the one played by Tone--even though it's a relatively common name and he might not be the one. So, despite having no hard evidence, she strikes like a blitzkrieg--not caring what sort of repercussions there might be.

Now if this isn't bad enough (and amazingly contrived), it turns out that this Gray might just be the one. However (uggh, this is bad writing), he doesn't know if he is or isn't because he had a head injury and six weeks of his life are missing. During that time he MIGHT have gotten married and fathered the kids--but he doesn't know! Later (in yet another badly written twist), he learns that the woman pretending to be his wife is a liar...and he now is in love with her and must have her!!!

The bottom line is that none of this film makes sense. It's built on one dopey premise after another and the movie is one of the most contrived and silly films I've ever seen. The end result is impossible to believe, quite stupid and really a waste of decent actors. Not worth your bothering with this one.

From a social point of view, the setup of this is quite interesting as it lightheartedly shows the post war problem of kids left behind by their forces dads returning to the USA. Some criticise it for being a ridiculous setup but the lead character is actually just trying to get a better life by taking advantage of the situation. How many people were desperate to escape ruined Britain at that time? Passport to Pimlico dealt with exactly the same problem but in a much superior way. This film's setup is a bit silly but then lots are.

This is an average comedy in the end but it's played well by the actors and isn't a waste of time at all.

With a far-fetched and often silly story, "Lost Honeymoon" is only mildly entertaining, and that mainly because of some decent performances by a mostly good cast. The romantic comedy story itself doesn't work very well.

Franchot Tone stars as a successful American architect who one day is confronted by an Englishwoman with two children, who claims to have married him when he served in England during World War II. The architect doesn't remember anything about it. Both the architect and the woman have secrets of their own, leading to an initially complicated, then rather silly, situation. While at times mildly entertaining, the story gets completely predictable very quickly, and is never very believable.

The only thing that keeps the movie from being a total loss is that the cast does a mostly acceptable job with some ridiculous characters. They do make you care a little bit about the characters, even though they are not very credible. Tone, in particular, does as well as anyone could with his situation. But this movie would only be of any real interest to those who enjoy all romantic comedies regardless of quality.

Leigh Jason is so unknown to me that I even entertained the possibility that he might be a she (no doubt because of that great actress and beauty, Vivian!)

Anyway, no biggie! It set me on the right ramp to launch LOST HONEYMOON, which opens with the news of the passing of a mother of twins in England, with the husband living in the USA. A close friend (Richards) of the deceased decides that the father must live up to his responsibilities in regard to the children and she impersonates the deceased by using her passport (back in 1947 that was far more possible than today, and even today it is still done to forge your identity, so no dent on reality there!)

At a frenzied pace the spectator learns that good old Franchot is about to marry beautiful Rafferty, completely amnesic about the fact that he had already tied the knot in England some years earlier. That sets in motion a series of funny developments with Franchot in good form, ably assisted by good friend Conway who himself is interested in Richards, who seems deeply moved by Franchot who is betrothed to Rafferty, with her rich dad in tow...

I watched a poor copy that did not permit rating cinematographic quality, but the script by Joseph Fields deserves plaudits for sharp zingers, twists and turns.

I loved it right to the clever ending. 8/10.