Humoresque

It opens with a close up of John Garfield and that, already, gets you going. The intensity and power of the man. A from rags to riches tale with an extra something. The extra something here is Clifford Odetts, the language is as pungent as its pace. The truth in John Garfield's face rises everything several notches but, perhaps, the biggest surprise from a 2007's standpoint, is Joan Crawford's performance. She's never been one of my favorites, I always thought impossible to warm up to her and her tough lady from the wrong side of the tracks left me cold but here, she's rounded and brilliant, torn between who she is and who she would like to be. Great lines, fantastic close ups - wearing eye glasses, removing the glasses and squinting - At moments you feel the camera devours her. The director, Jean Negulesco - Three Coins In The Fountain, How To Marry a Millionaire - never flown this high. This 1946 Warners melodrama has the stuff that great works of art are made of. Thrilling

Jean Negulescu, a director of Rumanian origin based in Hollywood since 1930s was responsible for several good films and "Humoresque" is one of them.

It's a good drama starring Joan Crawford who gives here one of her finest performances as Helen Wright, a cynical and selfish society woman who set her sight at a young talented violinist Paul Boray (John Garfield), offers help in making his carrier and later becomes concerned with his love, almost an obsession with his work - music, that comes to the point of neglecting (as she thinks) their relationship and herself personally - "I'm tired of playing the second fiddle!"

Significant part of the film has to do with New York, that is "all full with all kinds of animals, and not all of them are born here" as says the most cynical character in the film Sid Jeffers played by Oscar Levant. It's there that we witness several tribulations in Helen - Paul's relationship resulting in a tragic ending.

Wittiness of the script is probably the most important ingredient of "Humoresque" (besides Joan Crawford's performance) which turns it into a good classic film that stands repeated viewing. 8/10

There were two primary reasons for wanting to see 'Humoresque'. One was the cast, am especially an admirer of Joan Crawford. Considered a screen legend for good reason. The other was the music, absolutely adore classical music and love it when a film has a healthy dose of it. The involvement of Franz Waxman, one of the best film composers at that time and fine arranger of music, and that it was performed by violinist Isaac Stern made me more excited.

'Humoresque' has plenty to get excited about. Not only is it a great film in its own right, but it is a fine example of how to do melodrama well and what it's all about. To me, 'Humoresque' is so well made, directed, written and acted, while also having some of the best use of classical music on film. Not quite masterpiece level but close, and quintessential Crawford in both films and performances. Fans of Jean Negolesco will love it too, it's towards one of his best, same goes for male lead John Garfield. Almost everything works.

My only criticism is the length, with the film being for my tastes a little overlong. A little trimming towards the end would have helped.

Crawford however is just astounding. An intensely powerful performance and one of her best, vintage prime-Crawford really. Garfield seldom gave a finer performance than here in 'Humoresque', don't think he ever was this intensely passionate and electric. They are magnetic together. Oscar Levant was ckearly having fun with some of the film's best lines in a tailor-made role that had elements of himself in, his wisecracking is hilarious and never felt out of place. Instead it stopped it from being too heavy-going. Robert Blake never resorts to trying to be too cute or being whiney. Ruth Nelson, J Carroll Naish and Joan Chandler (although Gina is too much of a plot device and a not explored enough one) are rock solid support, especially Nelson.

Negulesco brings his usual tautness and edge, but also sophistication and he doesn't let the film get too overwrought or cold. 'Humoresque' is a wonder visually, with some world class cinematography. The story seldom felt dull, despite lagging a bit towards the end, and doesn't get campy or overwrought. The very end is very powerful and moving. The script never stops being hugely entertaining, Levant has most of the best lines with his wisecracks and witticisms but another favourite was Crawford's line when reacting to being asked as to whether she liked classical music and her references to Ravel and Beethoven are very witty.

As well as the cast, the music is a huge part of 'Humoresque's' appeal. Waxman's scoring is unmistakably lush and swells with emotion, but even better is the classical music which is incredible. The pieces originally written for the violin are some of the finest written for the instrument, and the arrangements work so well one would think that they were originally intended for the violin namely the Carmen fantasie (which became a popular concert piece and still is). Stern plays the music brilliantly, making very virtuosic music (i.e. Sarasate) sound easy, but he is not the only musician here. Levant, an immensely talented pianist (well you'd have to be if you play Gershwin well), and Peg La Centra also heavily contribute and they are effective. Particularly coming off well are one of the to this day best versions of the Carmen fantasie and an immensely powerful version of "Liebestod".

Summing up, great film and a must for fans of Crawford, Garfield, Levant, Waxman, Stern, classical music and Negulesco. 9/10

This movie is remarkably good in certain respects, disappointing in others, which may explain the wide range of scores and comments posted by previous reviewers on here.

To the positive:

1. The cinematography and lighting are often astounding. All those great closeups of Crawford, reminding you of silent movie camerawork. Perhaps the most interesting is at the start of Lalo's Rhapsodie espagnole, where it looks as if Paul Boray's playing is causing her to have an orgasm. Crawford and Garfield outlined against a setting sun is also wonderful. The list of the beautifully shot scenes is endless.

2. Crawford and Garfield's very fine, if very different, acting. She delivers her lines with breathless emotion, beautifully enunciated. He sticks to speaking like someone who grew up in a working-class New York neighborhood. (Some above found him unconvincing as a concert violinist because of his appearances as a tough guy in his previous movies. I found him very convincing. You shouldn't imagine that all classical musicians are fragile flowers. They aren't.) Both do a great deal with their faces in the endless closeups. Garfield really makes you believe not only that he is actually playing the violin in all those violin sequences. He makes you believe he is feeling every note and phrase. They are both a pleasure to watch.

3. The amount of well-performed classical music. We get large chunks, and sometimes even complete performances, of a lot of works. (For those who don't care for classical music, they can always watch the faces.)

4. The staging of the final beach scene. It's really remarkably put together. Though there are a few moments I could live without, such as the view of the seaweed under the ocean surface after a certain character walks into the sea.

To the negative:

1. The movie is too long for the story it tells. I still sit through the whole thing on a repeat viewing, but I wish it were shorter.

2. Oscar Levant's wisecracks, which delighted some previous viewers, get annoying after a while to me. They aren't all funny. Some of them could have been cut.

3. Both of the leads are, alternately, sympathetic and annoying. Crawford's Helen Wright can't understand why a professional musician wouldn't leave a rehearsal to see her. Garfield's Boray can't feel grateful to Helen for her help with his career. Etc. They are constantly getting on each other's nerves, sometimes for no good reason. Helen is an alcoholic, so that's probably realistic. Boray doesn't want to be beholden to anyone. But why?

This is not a movie I would watch frequently. But it is certainly a fine work of art, where the positives outweigh the negatives. If you haven't seen it and can focus on the cinematography and/or music, you will definitely enjoy it, despite its flaws.

Joan Crawford, (Helen Wright) plays the role of a very rich woman who is married and loves to entertain all kinds of actors, and musicians and she happens to meet a violin player named Paul Boray,(John Garfield). Paul came from a medium income family and his father, Rudy Boray, (J.Carrol Naish) is a Deli owner in New York City and finds that his son wants to play the violin. Helen Wright decides to introduce Paul into a world of famous musicians and agents who are very impressed by Paul's outstanding talent and he begins to climb up the ladder of success in the world of concert music. Helen is a rather wild woman who loves to drink and is involved with quite a few men, however, she falls madly in love with Paul and finally gets a divorce in order to marry Paul. This story has a very strange ending and you will never guess just how it really ends.