George White's Scandals

As the film began, I thought, "Here's just another musical with Jack Haley looking lost". Then it opened with these very lovely ladies strolling across the screen pulling curtains of credits. Don't ask me what was in those credits. Straight from the credits is Gene Krupa attacking them skins. I think, "This is a great start. But, it'll be downhill from here."

Then there is an interesting scene of former White Scadals performers leading to a very fun scene of, Joan Davis' daughter, Beverly Wills performing 'Life is Just a Bowl of Cherries'. There's a useless dance scene included. What becomes apparent is this is a broad comedy that someone shoved rather dull dance numbers into. That is what unfolded.

The comedy is not just a few scenes here and there. There is a loosy goosey story that lays the set for a lot of funny scenes and lots of bits often within the comedy bits. These smaller bits are also set within musical numbers. This is a film that has to be watched and listened to.

Aiding the viewing is some excellent camera work making the comedy and music work. The shooting of especially some physical gags is impressively clever.

This film also must've had a bit of trouble with the censors. There is a lot in here not seen otherwise in the decades around this film. I wonder if that might explain the amount of writers involved. I have to imagine the original version went further than seen here and just skated by after rewriting.

The biggest problem is what seems to have been the original main focus of the film, Martha Holliday. She just doesn't have enough "Umph", as they call it, to carry the main role. Joan Davis is, then, clearly the lead.

I believe this is also the most film and screen time Gene Krupa ever had. If you like Krupa, as I do, there is a lot to see here. His last number has some mighty provocative musical instruments attached.

Overall, my main focus of plot is set aside to focus on the successful comedy and fun throughout.

I'd write here that this is the first film with Jack Haley, I liked. Even in Oz, I wish Buddy Ebsen hadn't had allergic issues. Must've been his growing up in Florida.

Bottom line; I recommend this film. 7 out of 10 points.

I gave this film "5" out of "10", but there's a caveat.

The movie itself might be described anywhere along the continuim, from "Awful" to "Excellent", depending on what the viewer is looking for. My rating is purely arbitrary.

It's total escapist fare, one of hundreds of films ground out during WWII to divert the American people from the horrors of war for an hour or two, and it must have done its job. It's certainly diverting.

But what it is, more than anything else, is a time capsule of the fashions, manners and mores of a particular time and place. It is the year 1945 preserved in amber, and it was completely dated by 1947.

From the showgirls in the musical numbers - pompadoured, lacquered and outrageously costumed in what looks like whatever the wardrobe department had left over, to the irrepressible Joan Davis dressed to the nines and beyond in shoulder pads, sequins and hair, hair, hair - this picture is a never-ending parade of "What Not to Wear", '40's style, and it's a hoot.

Add a couple of silly romantic sub-plots and the slinky Jane Greer as the backstage back-stabber, and you have the whole package. There's even leading man Phillip Terry - briefly married to Joan Crawford in real life, and the scene-stealing Margaret Hamilton thrown in for good measure. And believe me, anyone who can steal a scene from Joan Davis and Jack Haley in their prime is guilty of grand theft thespeus.

So there you have it. This one is not likely to show up on AFI's list of anything. If you're looking for a Golden Age musical, this isn't it. But if you're in the mood to spend a little time watching how your grandparents did it, this one's for you.

its an average corny musical,from the mid 40s, that has many flaws, but can still be kinda fun to watch, if you're in to older movies....

it has an OK cast including Joan Davis, Jack Haley, Philip Terry, Martha Holiday, Ethel smith, Margaret Hamilton, Glenn Tryon, Jane Greer,Audrey Young.......

the musicals parts of the movie are OK but very corny and kinda stupid, like most musicals back then i guess, so i cant totally say i recommend this, but it wasn't totally bad i guess, if you do want to see it, good luck finding it.....

This typical mid-40s RKO musical is enlivened a bit by Joan Davis' goofy mugging. The plot, of course, only serves to gives people time to take a break between the comedy bits and the musical numbers. We also have a view of Roach silent comedy star, Glen Tryon as George White.

The musical numbers are pretty good, particularly the first one with Gene Krupa, a triumph of choreography and camera-work. Krupa seems a little.... weird in the number, however, like he's on strong drugs and flipping out. Although this is not unheard of in drummers who are not on drugs, it may be significant that Krupa had spent time in jail on a marijuana rap in 1943, and this might have been an attempt to capitalize on his 'bad boy' image.

Clarabelle Evans (Margaret Hamilton) is opposed to her brother Jack Evans (Jack Haley) getting with the inappropriate comedic star Joan Mason (Joan Davis). Tom McGrath (Phillip Terry) is the assistant to Broadway impresario George White. He has nice banter with Jill Martin (Martha Holliday) from a rich family.

It's a rom-com musical out of RKO. It certainly names a lot of stars. That's what this feels like. It's a second tier cast doing their musical stage performance best. I like Joan Davis and maybe it should be all about her. I certainly see the reason why a younger pairing is included. It's an old musical with mixed results.