Après s'être dérobés l'un l'autre, deux voleurs se retrouvent embarqués pour la Chine. Afin d'échapper à la police Hongkongaise, Meldrick a la mauvaise idée de se déguiser en officier qui l'... Tout lireAprès s'être dérobés l'un l'autre, deux voleurs se retrouvent embarqués pour la Chine. Afin d'échapper à la police Hongkongaise, Meldrick a la mauvaise idée de se déguiser en officier qui l'amène à être envoyé sur le front sino-japonais.Après s'être dérobés l'un l'autre, deux voleurs se retrouvent embarqués pour la Chine. Afin d'échapper à la police Hongkongaise, Meldrick a la mauvaise idée de se déguiser en officier qui l'amène à être envoyé sur le front sino-japonais.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires au total
- Hotel Manager
- (as Edward Ciannelli)
- Japanese Officer
- (non crédité)
- Japanese Radio Man
- (non crédité)
- Sailor
- (non crédité)
- Soldier in Saloon
- (non crédité)
- Soldier in Saloon
- (non crédité)
- Restaurant Patron
- (non crédité)
- Officer
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
The first half is a fun little screw-ball caper. I like both Gable and Russell having fun with the characters and each other. It's loads of fun in a light affair. The movie eventually turns into war movie and it's not always the best. Gable and Russell get separated in a large middle section. Gable's con is a bit fun until the war breaks out. The action, the vehicles, and the gears are not the most realistic. It's also wartime in the real world and a bit of war propaganda is to be expected. This is a good pairing and one can excuse any flaws for the greater cause. The mix of a real war and light comedy is just a bit awkward.
Wait a minute.....weren't we talking about jewel thieves? Yes, and so was the picture, no more than fifteen minutes earlier.
Don't despair - before the final credits, the two stories are reconciled about as clumsily as the rest of the picture is put together.
Could it be that this 1941 product was deemed too lightweight and frivolous for an audience whose nation was being drawn into a world war, and that the studio bosses decided to make it more contemporary? If so, they should have taken their losses on what was already written and/or filmed, because the incongruous story they released is an embarrassment.
It's a fairly formulaic film carried on the charms of the leads; director Clarence Brown can't overcome the MGM gloss to provide the screwball details that the first half of the film really needs, although Peter Lorre as a shady and unctuous tramp steamer captain is a lot of fun.
I have the feeling Miss Russell replaced Myrna Loy at some stage in the production and the first couple of reels show damage. Clarence Brown directs the comedy bits for everyone but the two leads, a telling indictment of his opinion of their chops. Even worse, William H. Daniel's high-lit camerawork makes Miss Russell look a trifle jowly.
The film has a bit of romance, a bit of comedy, a bit of a con job and a lot of charm.
I give it a highly respectable 8 out of 10 IMDB rating. It is the type of film that is over before you want it to be finished. It is quite entertaining even some eight (80) years later. I must be an old soul because I just love these TCM movies.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThey Met in Bombay was the third film Rosalind Russell and Clark Gable made together. In the first two, Forsaking All Others (1934) and China Seas (1935), Russell wasn't Gable's leading lady. Joan Crawford stole his heart in Forsaking All Others and in China Seas, Russell played Gable's former girlfriend, who faced some tough competition in Jean Harlow. But given the opportunity, Russell genuinely enjoyed working with Gable and unlike some of his co-stars, was at ease playing love scenes opposite him. No director ever had to give him directions in a love scene. He was a very graceful person...much like a ballet dancer. "He was beautiful to play a love scene with," Russell commented. She also recalled how much difficulty she normally had filming romantic scenes. "Love scenes...(were) murder for me," said Russell. "The only man who could make a love scene comfortable was Clark Gable."
- GaffesWhen the Japanese soldiers confront Meldrick in the town square and, again, when the Japanese set an ambush on the road, they are wearing German "coal scuttle" helmets. In fact, contemporary photographs of the Japanese Army in China (e.g., during the Rape of Nanking) show Japanese soldiers with German army "coal scuttle" helmets, which, obviously, were purchased from Nazi Germany.
- Citations
Gerald Meldrick: It's my duty to arrest you... but how can a man put handcuffs on moonlight?
- ConnexionsFeatured in Clark Gable: Tall, Dark and Handsome (1996)
- Bandes originalesOn the Road to Mandalay
(uncredited)
Music by Oley Speaks
Lyrics by Rudyard Kipling
Played several times as part of the score
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- They Met in Bombay
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 380 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 32min(92 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1