Sinners in the Sun

Sinners in the Sun (1932)

*** (out of 4)

Jimmie (Chester Morris) and Doris (Carole Lombard) are in love with each other but Doris wants riches and she's not sure Jimmie will ever be able to give them to her. They end up breaking up and before long she's in the arms of a married man (Walter Byron) while he finds himself married to a rich woman (Adrienne Ames). Before long Doris begins to think that money might not be everything.

If you're looking for a great or hard-hitting plot then you're not going to find it here. SINNERS IN THE SUN is pretty much a standard story of a couple poor people who think money is the answer and they have to learn that it isn't more important than love. This type of rags to riches story was quite popular during the early sound days and this one here remains watchable thanks in large part to a great cast of characters.

Morris has always been one of my favorite actors. He might not have ever became a huge star but I've enjoyed going through his career and this is certainly one of his better performances. At first he's style of speech and his delivery reminded me of Jimmy Stewart, although that actor hadn't yet even appeared in Hollywood. Morris gets a couple very good scenes including one where he lets loose on his former love and the actor did a terrific job here.

The rest of the cast is extremely good as well with Lombard doing a very good job in her role of the woman who wants gold, gets it and lives to regret it. She's very good in the role and quite believable whether she's playing that small town girl or the spoiled rich one. The supporting players are nice as well and this includes a young Cary Grant in his second screen appearance. He doesn't have much to do but his few scenes are quite good. Alison Skipworth also gets a couple very funny scenes playing Lombard's mother.

As I said, storywise SINNERS IN THE SUN is pretty silly and predictable but the actors make it worth sitting through.

This simple 1930s film seems to have the underlying theme that a person should be happy with their lot in life and shouldn't want more out of life--a reasonable less considering it was the Depression! When the film begins, Doris (Carole Lombard) and Jimmie (Chester Morris) are in love but to Doris there needs to be much more. This is because although Jimmie has a job, he's not exactly wealthy and she wants money and a fancy life. So, she dumps him and goes off on a search for a rich husband. Jimmie is angry and disgusted but eventually he goes looking for a rich wife. However, even though both have a cushy rich life in front of them, neither is happy.

The biggest reason to see this film is to see Cary Grant in one of his first films. He's reasonably good as a nice rich man but nothing more. As far as the story goes, I liked it but felt the fast run-time was a serious detriment. Because it went by so fast, the story felt more like an object lesson than about real people. But it still was modestly interesting and is worth a look.

As pre-code movies go, this is a great, well-produced and entertaining example. Everything you'd expect is here: The Depression, thwarted aspirations, class conflict, beautiful leading ladies (in sexy lingerie of course) plus good old fashioned moralising.

If you enjoy pictures from this period, you mustn't overlook this often overlooked one. The multi-layered characters are written with depth and realism - they're not the flat dimensionless cartoons who so often appear in films from this era. The story is pretty well trodden but scripted here with life and wit. The theme is that old chestnut: poor girl is seduced by rich man but this time it's doubled up because we get a poor boy (the poor girl's ex) who is also seduced by a rich girl.

Like a Warner Brothers picture, its point of view is from the perspective of the working class people but refreshingly the society characters are not soulless evil villains twiddling their moustaches. They are portrayed as real people too as well with real issues. Their attitudes and sense of entitlement however is cleverly and heavily criticised particularly the way both rich playboy Eric and society gal Claire treat their working class lovers like pets, loved pets yes but not like "their" people. But it's not their fault - it's just the way they are and it reflects the stratified unequal society of the time.

At Belfast's Titanic exhibition, it's explained how imperative it was to separate the 1st and 2nd class passengers from those in 3rd class. It seems crazy to us now that so much effort was put into ensuring that 'nice' people would never ever have the awful experience of actually seeing a poor person. As we see in this fabulous film, if the two classes of people even just see each other, disaster awaits! This treats the horrible disparity between the haves and have-nots in a much more light hearted way than other films but nevertheless still stirs a sense of outrage. This aspect is even subtly imbued in the inevitable girls' dressing room scenes. The rich guys see nothing wrong with walking in on them as are getting changed because they're rich and they're just working class girls. One of those girls might be lucky if Mr wealthy decides to pluck them from their life of drudgery. Welcome to the 1930s!

Besides a profusion of young ladies in their underwear, one big reason to watch this isn't that bloke from Bristol, it's Adrienne Ames! She wasn't really an actress, she didn't make too many pictures, she was 'The celebrity' of the age. Her acting isn't that convincing but she certainly lights up the screen and it's great to see her in a rare leading role.

Remember all those Jean Harlow movies about poor girls wanting to marry rich fellows? If you liked them, check out Carole Lombard and Chester Morris in Sinners in the Sun. Ironically, the same year, Chester played the rich fellow in Jean Harlow's Red-Headed Woman. In this movie, he's a poor garage mechanic in love with Carole. He wants to get married, but she's afraid of a life of poverty. Given her background and growing up in the Great Depression, it's understandable.

Carole and Chester part ways in search of wealthy partners. Carole finds a married man who wants fun on the side, and Chester finds a wealthy woman who likes how he looks in a tuxedo. This pre-Code drama is a bit naughty, with see-through negligees and references to gigolos. Mostly, though, it's a tragedy about two people who think they'll be happier with money than with love. It's always a treat to see Carole in a drama, and Chester gives a great performance as he struggles with his pride. "Did you think I'd cry?" he asks, his voice breaking, when reunited with Carole after they've settled into other lives. If you like this one, check out Swing High, Swing Low.

DLM Warning: If you suffer from vertigo or dizzy spells, like my mom does, this movie might not be your friend. About 45 minutes in, and at 52 minutes in, the camera spins for about thirty seconds, and that will make you sick. In other words, "Don't Look, Mom!"

Doris (Carole Lombard) and Jimmie (Chester Morris) have been dating for some time and pretty much everyone assumes they'll one day marry. However, when he asks her to marry him, Doris announces that she won't marry him, as she wants a man with money....and Jimmie is just a poor mechanic. They both go their own way...she as a model and he is hired as a chauffeur for a pretty rich woman. Soon BOTH end up with offers of marriage from rich folks...and hers from a man who is already married! Can either be happy without the other or living 'the good life' with the rich and powerful?

Apart from a chance to see Cary Grant in one of his early supporting roles, the film is still worth seeing. Occasionally, it comes off as heavy-handed (such as the scene that obviously telegraphs a suicide to come) and the message seems ironic considering how rich these Hollywood folks are...but it's also enjoyable and the two leads do a splendid job.

While the film only vaguely goes there, the implication is that Doris perhaps has been putting out in order to get rich and famous. Many other Pre-Code films might have made this more obvious and vulgar.