Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA murder is committed aboard a cruise ship just before it sinks in a storm. The survivors, including the killer, land on a mysterious jungle island.A murder is committed aboard a cruise ship just before it sinks in a storm. The survivors, including the killer, land on a mysterious jungle island.A murder is committed aboard a cruise ship just before it sinks in a storm. The survivors, including the killer, land on a mysterious jungle island.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Sidney Bracey
- Carlo - Purser
- (as Sidney Bracy)
Allan Cavan
- Capt. Rush
- (as Allen Cavan)
John Beck
- Hanson - Ship's Officer First Mate
- (as Jack Beck)
Gordon De Main
- Doctor
- (non crédité)
Grace Hayle
- Ship Passenger
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
In the opening moments of THE INTRUDER, a murder is committed on a ship at sea. A group of suspects is assembled, while a storm rages outside. Panic commences when the ship sinks, sending everyone into lifeboats.
Winding up on an island, the suspects, along with some crewmembers, discover a wild man (Mischa Auer) inhabiting the island. Horror ensues.
Basically, this is an "old dark house" movie set on board the aforementioned ship, and the island, instead of a huge mansion. Auer is his usual hulking, brooding self. The rest are fairly expendable.
Not a bad way to burn up an hour...
Winding up on an island, the suspects, along with some crewmembers, discover a wild man (Mischa Auer) inhabiting the island. Horror ensues.
Basically, this is an "old dark house" movie set on board the aforementioned ship, and the island, instead of a huge mansion. Auer is his usual hulking, brooding self. The rest are fairly expendable.
Not a bad way to burn up an hour...
Intruder, The (1933)
** (out of 4)
Bland "old dark house" type mystery but this one here takes place on a deserted island. The film starts off on a cruise ship where a man is murdered but before the killer can be located, the ship sinks with the survivors ending up on a strange island, which appears to be the home of a killer gorilla and a strange caveman. This is a pretty bizarre little film but the screenplay is so weak and so full of holes that I couldn't help but grow rather tired, which isn't good considering the movie runs just 57-minutes. The biggest problem is the story that seems to go in and out of focus as the movie never seems to really pay much attention to the actual mystery going on. Not only do we have the mystery but quite often it takes a back seat to various comedy attempts via a drunk, fighting characters and the strange Tarzan-like creature who keeps yelling throughout the film. The gorilla shows up in a couple scenes and to be honest, I'm still not really sure what he was up to. The inside of the cave with the two skeletons was pretty funny but in the end there's just not enough to keep this thing going. The performances are decent but nothing great. Griffith fans might be interested in checking out Wilfred Lucas in his small role here.
** (out of 4)
Bland "old dark house" type mystery but this one here takes place on a deserted island. The film starts off on a cruise ship where a man is murdered but before the killer can be located, the ship sinks with the survivors ending up on a strange island, which appears to be the home of a killer gorilla and a strange caveman. This is a pretty bizarre little film but the screenplay is so weak and so full of holes that I couldn't help but grow rather tired, which isn't good considering the movie runs just 57-minutes. The biggest problem is the story that seems to go in and out of focus as the movie never seems to really pay much attention to the actual mystery going on. Not only do we have the mystery but quite often it takes a back seat to various comedy attempts via a drunk, fighting characters and the strange Tarzan-like creature who keeps yelling throughout the film. The gorilla shows up in a couple scenes and to be honest, I'm still not really sure what he was up to. The inside of the cave with the two skeletons was pretty funny but in the end there's just not enough to keep this thing going. The performances are decent but nothing great. Griffith fans might be interested in checking out Wilfred Lucas in his small role here.
Mere minutes have passed and the film already makes an impression of being both very direct (dialogue, plot development, scene writing, pacing), and very unbothered about itself, with acting, delivery, and direction that doesn't do well in trying to convey the import of what's going on. This feat of duality is almost impressive since the narrative begins with a murder and the sinking of a passenger cruise. Whether one wishes to assume deficiencies of the production, or prints that had degraded before digital preservation, such sensibilities aren't aided by muddled sound design and less than pristine image quality. Setting these matters aside, the scene writing, dialogue, and plot development are also decidedly unconvincing even on paper, with ideas being introduced as weakly as they possibly could be. Before even one-third of the runtime has elapsed we're already greeted with a few different moments that can only inspire quizzical skepticism, to the point that the storytelling in and of itself struggles to attain basic suspension of disbelief. Sadly, the picture never improves: 1933's 'The intruder' is a dud that sunk as surely and quickly as its ship.
Languid, passive, flimsy, half-hearted, dubious, middling, and soporific, nothing of significance comes off well in this feature. Frances Hyland's writing, Albert Ray's direction, and the acting of all are downright floundering, if not altogether bewildering. I can't tell if this is intended to be a comedy or a drama, but it doesn't matter, because it's terrible on both counts. In fairness, the crew behind the scenes did good work, on the sets in particular. The most commendable aspect of the entire movie might be the editing, with some transitions that seem advanced for 1933 - "might" is the key word, however, for the novelty is overused. Meanwhile, there comes a time when the plot becomes rather scattered and unfocused, and I wonder if even those involved knew what was going on. Characters are so poorly written, bereft of substance, that 'The intruder' may as well have been a radio play instead of a film. Best of all, however, is that the vast majority of this picture, gawky and flailing as it is, is pointlessly extraneous: within the first five minutes, we can also easily guess the reveal of the killer at the end.
Some of the best movies ever made hail from the 1920s or 30s, but 'The intruder' is apt demonstration that age is no guarantee of value, for this stinks to high heaven from the very start to the very end. I can safely say that I have seen worse pictures, though at this level, the distinction is meaningless. That the thin plot is so feebly crafted, plumbing the deepest depths, serves to distract from other rickety elements of the production, but that is absolutely no compliment. What else to say? You don't need to watch this. No one does.
Languid, passive, flimsy, half-hearted, dubious, middling, and soporific, nothing of significance comes off well in this feature. Frances Hyland's writing, Albert Ray's direction, and the acting of all are downright floundering, if not altogether bewildering. I can't tell if this is intended to be a comedy or a drama, but it doesn't matter, because it's terrible on both counts. In fairness, the crew behind the scenes did good work, on the sets in particular. The most commendable aspect of the entire movie might be the editing, with some transitions that seem advanced for 1933 - "might" is the key word, however, for the novelty is overused. Meanwhile, there comes a time when the plot becomes rather scattered and unfocused, and I wonder if even those involved knew what was going on. Characters are so poorly written, bereft of substance, that 'The intruder' may as well have been a radio play instead of a film. Best of all, however, is that the vast majority of this picture, gawky and flailing as it is, is pointlessly extraneous: within the first five minutes, we can also easily guess the reveal of the killer at the end.
Some of the best movies ever made hail from the 1920s or 30s, but 'The intruder' is apt demonstration that age is no guarantee of value, for this stinks to high heaven from the very start to the very end. I can safely say that I have seen worse pictures, though at this level, the distinction is meaningless. That the thin plot is so feebly crafted, plumbing the deepest depths, serves to distract from other rickety elements of the production, but that is absolutely no compliment. What else to say? You don't need to watch this. No one does.
Obviously dated,this has some interesting bits,especially on the island.They never do go much into the why's and how's of the "resident" on the island,either.Probably ahead of its time in terms of "spookiness",worth a glance,but probably not much else...An opener for,perhaps,films of greater import??
This film starts with a murder aboard a steamboat that already contains a detective who immediately goes to work investigating. He starts by gathering all the suspects when the ship gets in trouble in a bad storm. Forced to evacuate, all the suspects are loaded into the last lifeboat with the captain, first mate and detective. They end up castaway on a tropical island together with a gorilla and a strange Tarzan-like character...complete with his "Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-aaaaaaa" call. The murder victim stole precious diamonds and the detective thinks the murder is after them. The two women, Connie and Daisy, have a gorgeous wardrobe that seems to survive their ordeal...satin (or silk) and furs...not to mention their jewelry. The mystery gets solved and they get rescued by a French ship...but not before there is some unusual comedy by a drunken brother and a skeleton.
I think this is a fun historical number...but not the most interesting of mysteries and frankly I had a little trouble keeping the suspects straight. Not on my recommendation list unless you just want some light entertainment.
I think this is a fun historical number...but not the most interesting of mysteries and frankly I had a little trouble keeping the suspects straight. Not on my recommendation list unless you just want some light entertainment.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis film's earliest documented telecast took place in New York City Tuesday 23 August 1949 on WPIX (Channel 11).
- ConnexionsFeatured in Murder Before Midnight: The Intruder
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 6 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant