[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
IMDbPro

Quel phénomène!

Titre original : Welcome Danger
  • 1929
  • Approved
  • 1h 53min
NOTE IMDb
5,9/10
876
MA NOTE
Harold Lloyd and Noah Young in Quel phénomène! (1929)
Comédie

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueHarold Bledsoe, a botany student, is called back home to San Francisco, where his late father had been police chief, to help investigate a crime wave in Chinatown.Harold Bledsoe, a botany student, is called back home to San Francisco, where his late father had been police chief, to help investigate a crime wave in Chinatown.Harold Bledsoe, a botany student, is called back home to San Francisco, where his late father had been police chief, to help investigate a crime wave in Chinatown.

  • Réalisation
    • Clyde Bruckman
    • Malcolm St. Clair
  • Scénario
    • Paul Gerard Smith
    • Felix Adler
    • Lex Neal
  • Casting principal
    • Harold Lloyd
    • Barbara Kent
    • Noah Young
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    5,9/10
    876
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Clyde Bruckman
      • Malcolm St. Clair
    • Scénario
      • Paul Gerard Smith
      • Felix Adler
      • Lex Neal
    • Casting principal
      • Harold Lloyd
      • Barbara Kent
      • Noah Young
    • 30avis d'utilisateurs
    • 13avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos25

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 19
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux20

    Modifier
    Harold Lloyd
    Harold Lloyd
    • Harold Bledsoe
    Barbara Kent
    Barbara Kent
    • Billie Lee
    Noah Young
    Noah Young
    • Officer Patrick Clancy
    Charles Middleton
    Charles Middleton
    • John Thorne aka The Dragon
    • (as Chas. Middleton)
    Will Walling
    Will Walling
    • Police Captain Walton
    • (as William Walling)
    Grady Sutton
    Grady Sutton
    • Man at Party (silent version)
    • (scènes coupées)
    Brooks Benedict
    Brooks Benedict
    • Handcuffed Prisoner at Police Station
    • (non crédité)
    Eddy Chandler
    Eddy Chandler
    • Cop
    • (non crédité)
    Rae Daggett
    • Woman Sitting in Police Station
    • (non crédité)
    Douglas Haig
    • Buddy Lee
    • (non crédité)
    Edgar Kennedy
    Edgar Kennedy
    • SFPD Desk Sergeant
    • (non crédité)
    Tetsu Komai
    • Florist Henchman
    • (non crédité)
    Wang Lee
    • Chinaman with Queue
    • (non crédité)
    James B. Leong
    • Florist Henchman
    • (non crédité)
    • …
    Jim Mason
    Jim Mason
    • Barry Steele
    • (non crédité)
    • …
    Nelson McDowell
    Nelson McDowell
    • 1st Train Passenger
    • (non crédité)
    Soo Hoo Sun
    • Dead Chinese Man
    • (non crédité)
    James Wang
    • Dr. Chang Gow
    • (non crédité)
    • Réalisation
      • Clyde Bruckman
      • Malcolm St. Clair
    • Scénario
      • Paul Gerard Smith
      • Felix Adler
      • Lex Neal
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs30

    5,9876
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    4JohnSeal

    Not so good

    Welcome Danger was Harold Lloyd's first talkie, and the transition was not an easy one. Well, easier compared to those of Keaton and Chaplin, but Lloyd's silent pratfalls are poorly paced for a soundie and the film is desperately overlong. This is best reserved for hardcore Lloydites--beginners are advised to check out his mid to late twenties silents before investigating his talkies, of which this is the weakest.
    classicalcharles

    A window into Hollywood history

    Anyone who's seen `Singin' In The Rain' knows the panic engendered by the arrival of sound in Hollywood. Virtually overnight, the accepted methods and styles of filmmaking had to change to accommodate the new technology, and comedies were perhaps affected most of all. Instead of relying on wild car chases, broad gestures and sight gags, movies now had to include verbal comedy of the sort that wouldn't fit neatly onto title cards, and the dialogue had to be delivered with comic timing, since it was being heard rather than read off the screen. The most remarkable thing about this movie is how easily Harold Lloyd seemed to navigate this conversion to sound. The dialogue is clever, naturalistic, well-delivered and well-recorded, and the music has obviously been scored to support the action, and all this a matter of months after the first appearance of sound technology in Hollywood! The difference in technique is apparent when you compare the broader, overdubbed silent scenes with Clancy the cop and the somewhat more subtle, sound scenes at the police station and with Billie Lee.

    As a side note, notice how the character of the Chinese doctor is treated respectfully, and even the black henchman of the Dragon, apparently invulnerable except for his glass shins, isn't the usual stereotype we expect in movies of the period. On the minus side, the movie is overlong and could have done without the opening sequence involving Lloyd and his `disguised' girlfriend. But overall, this is an enjoyable comedy and an interesting record of Hollywood's transition to sound.
    bensonj

    A MAJOR DISAPPOINTMENT

    This film was started as a silent and finished as a sound film. One would expect, then, to see some classic Lloyd "silent" comedy sequences, but this is a very disappointing and largely unfunny film. Lloyd's hallmark was always fresh, original, well-worked-out visual gags, but the poorly timed shenanigans here often remind one of something below the Three Stooges: the Bowery Boys, maybe. In virtually every other Lloyd film, regardless of whether he was shy, cocky, a success or a bumbler, his character was always inventive, thinking up ingenious solutions to the problems he found himself in. In this film, much of the humor is based on his simple stupidity. There are endless really primitive early action gags: one character gets the bad guys to chase him while the another stands behind a large crate and bats them on the head as they go by; a character takes a swing with a club to hit someone in front of him and accidentally hits someone creeping up behind him; a friend puts his hand on Lloyd's shoulder so he won't get lost in the dark, but when Lloyd gets back into the light the hand on his shoulder is that of a foe. These and other familiar lightweight gags abound, and the Lloyd's imaginative building of original gags is nowhere to be seen. In addition, nearly identical weak gags are sometimes repeated several times in a row. The bumbling around in a chinatown basement just seems interminable.

    What happened? Lloyd's films before and after this one are all classics of top-notch comedy. This is a lapse that's unique in Lloyd's career.
    3Neal99

    A huge letdown

    While one can admire Harold Lloyd's willingness to plunge into sound films, this effort is a huge letdown after the brilliance of his silent films, culminating in `Speedy.' Many of the gags go on WAY too long, and sound makes much of the slapstick more painful than funny. It may be that sound also contributes to making Lloyd's character extremely annoying, especially in the early reels. If that weren't enough, the dubbing process used in the scenes not reshot for sound is very primitive and distracting. Worth seeing for Lloyd fans, but not too funny.
    masercot

    The Most Chinese Head Injuries in an American Movie

    How many bludgeonings can you have in a movie before it ceases to be funny? My five year old and I might disagree on this, but I think that Harold Lloyd crossed that subtle line in this movie. It started off cute and funny, but quickly became sadistic. Compared to Hot Water and Safety Last, this was a poor comedy; however, compared to the Three Stooges or The Ritz Brothers, it wasn't bad.

    Maybe hitting several dozen Chinese immigrants in the head with a club was funnier back then...

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Pour l'amour du ciel
    7,5
    Pour l'amour du ciel
    Patte de chat
    6,6
    Patte de chat
    Ça t'la coupe!
    7,7
    Ça t'la coupe!
    Une riche famille
    7,1
    Une riche famille
    Monte là-dessus!
    8,1
    Monte là-dessus!
    Noix de coco
    6,8
    Noix de coco
    La divorcée
    6,7
    La divorcée
    Jeunes filles modernes
    6,2
    Jeunes filles modernes
    Hollywood chante et danse
    5,7
    Hollywood chante et danse
    Halleluyah
    6,7
    Halleluyah
    Et puis ça va
    7,1
    Et puis ça va
    Pour l'amour de Mary
    6,7
    Pour l'amour de Mary

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Began shooting as a silent in August, 1928 at Metropolitan Studios, it would become an agonizingly long and complicated production. It was finally released on October 12, 1929 as a talkie after largely being re-shot with another director - Clyde Bruckman as a talkie (marking the first time Lloyd worked from a script) and painstakingly edited down from an original 16-reels (some 2 hours and forty-five minutes) to 12-reels. The silent version cost $521,000 and another $281,000 was spent on the sound negative. While the novelty of hearing Lloyd speak made it his largest grossing hit since Vive le sport! (1925), those steep production costs resulted in a huge drop in net profits from his earlier features.
    • Gaffes
      After the dish washing scene ends between Harold and Billlie and the screen goes dark, CUT! can clearly be heard before the next scene begins.
    • Citations

      Billie Lee: I just put my foot in the wrong place.

      Harold Bledsoe: Oh, you did. Well, if you do it again, I'll put my foot in the right place!

    • Versions alternatives
      There is an all-silent version of this film distributed to unwired cinemas which includes more of the original "silent" version and is adapted with inter-titles for the newer sound sequences.
    • Connexions
      Featured in American Masters: Harold Lloyd: The Third Genius (1989)
    • Bandes originales
      Billie
      (uncredited)

      Written by Lynn Cowan

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 17 janvier 1930 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Langues
      • Anglais
      • Cantonais
      • Allemand
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Welcome Danger
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Metropolitan Studios - 1040 N. Las Palmas Avenue, Hollywood, Los Angeles, Californie, États-Unis(Studio)
    • Société de production
      • The Harold Lloyd Corporation
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 979 828 $US (estimé)
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 53min(113 min)
    • Couleur
      • Black and White

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.