Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA mystery writer and his sweetheart are held hostage by a fugitive gangster who hopes to get the writer's help in devising the "perfect crime."A mystery writer and his sweetheart are held hostage by a fugitive gangster who hopes to get the writer's help in devising the "perfect crime."A mystery writer and his sweetheart are held hostage by a fugitive gangster who hopes to get the writer's help in devising the "perfect crime."
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires au total
- Mr. Van Buren
- (non crédité)
- Detective
- (non crédité)
- Porter
- (non crédité)
- Train Conductor
- (non crédité)
- Mrs. Barfuss
- (non crédité)
- Sam
- (non crédité)
- Bennie
- (non crédité)
- Cossack
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
A man and his fiancé (Ernest Treux and Una Merkel) are on their way to elope but their car breaks down in front of a mansion containing a lot of no-good mobsters. When the head mobster (Edward Albert) hears that the man is a mystery writer who prides himself on his ability to write good murders, he decides to hold the two people captive until Treux designs a fool-proof way to murder someone. Because they don't want to die, they reluctantly help the crooks, but along the way they come up with some very clever and funny ways to undo this great murder plan. While I am sure some of what they did was impossible, it was believable enough and very smartly written and acted (especially the part about the poisoned toothpaste). The beginning was a tad slow, but thanks to subtle humor that began to assert itself later in the film, it really picked up and improved. An excellent and cute variation on the typical gangster film.
By the way, this film was created before the Hollywood Production Code was enforced in 1934-35. While this film didn't feature nudity, bad language or excessive violence like some Pre-Code films, it did have an interesting bit of sexual innuendo. When it looked like the mob was going to kill the two regardless, the pair are still unmarried and are forced to spend the night together in the same bedroom. It seems that Mr. Treux is an honorable guy and he rebuffs Merkel's repeated suggestions they have one night of whoopee! Late in the film, however, when her father comes to the rescue, the dad says "What have you done to my daughter?"--at which point Merkel shouts out "Practically EVERYTHING!!". This was a very funny line, but I am sure in the remake this was removed due to a much higher level of censorship in films in 1941.
Truex was most adept at comedy, and "Whistling in the Dark" is the only male lead he had, after a decade-long hiatus from the silver screen that covered the last years of silent and first years of sound pictures. It's as though this movie and plot were designed for him - the small, mild-mannered character. Indeed this role was tailored for a Donald Meek-type character - or, Ernest Truex.
This film has a good comedy and crime plot; and Truex is the hero by using his brains. His girlfriend, Toby Van Buren, is played by Una Merkel who's at least half a head taller than our hero. The couple are engaged but her father doesn't approve of Porter. When their car breaks down on a country drive, they fall into the hands of a gang of crooks. A very good supporting cast rounds out this picture with Edward Arnold, Nat Pendleton ad Henry Gordon at the top of that list.
Truex has some demure expressions at times, reflecting somewhat the hammy look of him and many others in silent films. Only here, It's adds some to the humor. Truex plays Wallace Porter, a renowned author of murder mysteries. When Jake Dillon's (Edward Arnold) gang holds him to force him to plot the perfect murder so they can bump off a brewer who won't pay for protection, Porter has to use his brains to outsmart the gang.
This is an entertaining film that modern audiences should still enjoy. My favorite line in the film is by Edward Arnold's Jake Dillon. He asks Wallace Porter, "Now what would you rather be at a funeral - a mourner or a corpse?"
It's a shame Skelton wasn't ten years older or Merkel wasn't ten years younger, because in the remake, they would have made a dynamite couple and made the 1941 version so funny and effective it could have given those in delicate health a coronary. This version is mildly recommended for the plot and the supporting players.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe play opened on Broadway in New York City, New York, USA on 19 January 1932 and closed in February 1933 after 265 performances. Ernest Truex and Edward Arnold originated their movie roles in the play. The opening night cast also included Claire Trevor in the role of Toby Van Buren.
- GaffesAfter Wally tells Slim about the $10,000 and Slim is walking into the adjoining room whistling, the mic shadow is clearly visible on the upper left hand side of the frame.
- Citations
[Lombardo puts his foot up on a piece of furniture and bends over to tie his shoe. Slim enters from behind, and looks him up and down]
Slim Scanlon: Hello, Mr. Lombardo.
Ricco Lombardo: [Not turning around] Hello.
Slim Scanlon: [Examining his rump] We ain't met, but I recognized you from your description.
- ConnexionsRemade as Whistling in the Dark (1941)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Durée1 heure 19 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1