NOTE IMDb
5,7/10
980
MA NOTE
Élevé par un singe sans petit, l'héritier orphelin des Greystokes devient l'un des leurs. Le Dr Porter organise une expédition de sauvetage et sa belle fille Jane attire son attention. Tarza... Tout lireÉlevé par un singe sans petit, l'héritier orphelin des Greystokes devient l'un des leurs. Le Dr Porter organise une expédition de sauvetage et sa belle fille Jane attire son attention. Tarzan des singes a-t-il trouvé la compagne idéale ?Élevé par un singe sans petit, l'héritier orphelin des Greystokes devient l'un des leurs. Le Dr Porter organise une expédition de sauvetage et sa belle fille Jane attire son attention. Tarzan des singes a-t-il trouvé la compagne idéale ?
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Madame Sul-Te-Wan
- Esmeralda - Jane's Maid
- (non crédité)
Stellan Windrow
- Tree-Swinging Tarzan
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
At this early point in American film history, Tarzan of the Apes was an instant success. Elmo Lincoln was perhaps the best actor at the time for the role. It's a fairly straight forward telling of the novel, tho Edgar Rice Burroughs was frequently on the set in an advisory role and his input was seldom utilized. In the books, Tarzan was quite the self-made scholar and this was barely touched upon in the film. For 1918, this turned out to be an excellent film, parts of which still hold up today. It's a solid 7 out of 10, and well worth seeing.
Cinema's first adaptation of Edgar Rice Burrough's famous novel sees screen strongman Elmo Lincoln claiming a place in cinematic history in the title role. With his bulging eyes and crazed grin, he's a strangely unhinged version of the ape man, but Lincoln's eccentric portrayal somehow makes him all the more convincing. Although only a 60 minute version of the original 2-hour film survives, the plot remains both coherent and remarkably faithful to Burrough's famous novel, and the swamplands of Louisiana provide a convincing substitute for the African jungle.
This original silent version of the Lord of the Apes is perhaps the truest screen representation of the way Tarzan is envisioned in the books by Edgar Rice Burroughs. It is seems very crude but really isn't. It follows the first story (in as much as it can in the limited time of the feature) very closely. Elmo Lincoln, while no Adonis, is very adequate in the role. He's not Johnny Weissmuller...but then Johnny didn't really look all too much like Tarzan should have either.
...because of his already established reputation as a Hollywood strong man (e.g. his role as the Mighty Man of Valor in the 1916 DW Griffith classic "Intolerance").
Also, the image of Tarzan in 1918 was not that of a lithe gymnast like Christopher Lambert in "Greystoke", but of a man powerful enough to wrestle lions. Strength equalled bulk.
There's an interesting piece of trivia attached to that movie and Uganda (that's in East Africa) where I'm now based. There's a popular myth around here that the 1918 version of "Tarzan of the Apes" was filmed on the northern shores of Lake Victoria. In fact it was shot, I believe, in Louisiana.
Also, the image of Tarzan in 1918 was not that of a lithe gymnast like Christopher Lambert in "Greystoke", but of a man powerful enough to wrestle lions. Strength equalled bulk.
There's an interesting piece of trivia attached to that movie and Uganda (that's in East Africa) where I'm now based. There's a popular myth around here that the 1918 version of "Tarzan of the Apes" was filmed on the northern shores of Lake Victoria. In fact it was shot, I believe, in Louisiana.
This is the first and oldest Tarzan movie ever made, as far as I know. Interesting mainly for that point. For the rest, I will always prefer Johnny Weissmuller as the Tarzan character, and I suppose I am not the only one to think like this. Elmo Lincoln could have been replaced by a more convincing actor, more athletic. OK, it tries to speak of the true, genuine story of Tarzan, according to the Edgard Rice Burrough's novel, as Hugh Hudson did in 1984. This is a good point that can justify to watch this rare item, xanks to TCM. This is also a shame that so many features fromt he silent era are now lost forever.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesEdgar Rice Burroughs sold the film rights for "Tarzan of the Apes" to the National Film Corporation on June 6, 1916. He received a record $5,000 cash advance on royalties, $50,000 in company stock and 5% of gross receipts.
- Versions alternativesAbridged version released by Hollywood Film Enterprises in 1937 with the title, Tarzan the Boy.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Fractured Flickers: Rose Marie (1963)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Tarzan of the Apes?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 3 270 000 $US
- Durée1 heure 13 minutes
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Tarzan chez les singes (1918) officially released in India in English?
Répondre